Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001766C070206
Original file (20050001766C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:     
	   

	BOARD DATE:           26 July 2005                  
	DOCKET NUMBER:   AR20050001766


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  


Mr. Carl W. S. Chun

Director

Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti

Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:


Ms. Linda D. Simmons

Chairperson

Mr. Patrick H. McGann Jr.

Member

Mr. Leonard G. Hassell

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence: 

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:  

1.  In effect, the applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for traumatic arthritis, and his hearing loss and sleep apnea be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC).

2.  The applicant states that he never went on sick call, he was never awarded a Purple Heart, and snoring wasn’t considered a problem.  However, hearing loss and sleep apnea worsen with age.

3.  The applicant provides documents which he lists on his request.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 

1.  CRSC, as established by Section 1413a, Title 10, United States Code, as amended, states that eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of service creditable for reserve retirement at age 60) and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.  Such disabilities must be compensated by the VA and rated at least 10% disabling.  For periods before 1 January 2004 (the date this statute was amended), members had to have disabilities for which they have been awarded the Purple Heart and are rated at least 10% disabled or who are rated at least 60% disabled as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.  CRSC benefits are equal to the amount of VA disability compensation offset from retired pay based on those disabilities determined to be combat-related.

2.  On 10 January 2005, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Branch determined that the applicant’s diabetes mellitus was combat related and awarded him a 20 percent CRSC rating for that condition.  However, the USAPDA CRSC Branch determined that the applicant’s traumatic arthritis was not combat related and denied his request for CRSC for that condition.  

3.  In the processing of similar cases, advisory opinions were obtained from the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (OUSD), Military Personnel Policy.  The OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order for a condition to be


considered combat related, there must be evidence of the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  CRSC was passed into law as a legislative initiative to eliminate the prohibition of military retirees from receiving VA disability benefits.  Due to cost constraints, only those military retirees who have disabilities incurred in combat, or in conditions simulating combat (which includes hazardous duties), are eligible for CRSC.

2.  As stated above, the CRSC criteria is specifically for those military retirees who have combat related disabilities.  Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC.  The military retiree must show that the disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing specially hazardous duties such as parachuting or scuba diving.

3.  While the applicant has submitted evidence to show that he was treated for recurrent dislocation of his right shoulder and lumbosacral discomfort while he was on active duty, he has not submitted any evidence that those conditions were combat related.  

4.  As for the applicant’s hearing loss and sleep apnea, there is no evidence that he had those conditions while he was on active duty; there is no evidence that they are combat related; and he has not been awarded a VA disability rating for them.  As such, these conditions cannot be approved for CRSC.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____lds__  ____lgh _  ___phm _  DENY APPLICATION





BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.





		_____Linda D. Simmons_________
		        CHAIRPERSON





INDEX

CASE ID
AR20050001766
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
20050726
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.










Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001766C070206

    Original file (20050001766C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Leonard G. Hassell | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Due to cost constraints, only those military retirees who have disabilities incurred in combat, or in conditions simulating combat (which includes hazardous duties), are eligible for CRSC. As for the applicant’s hearing loss and sleep apnea, there is no evidence that he had those conditions while he was on active duty; there is no evidence that they are...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014628

    Original file (20080014628.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states that the VA rated him at 50 percent for his sleep apnea and that the CRSC Agency is refusing to grant compensation for this condition. The applicant's records clearly show that the USAPDA determined that he is entitled to some CRSC benefits. However, there is no evidence and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to show that he is entitled additional CRSC benefits based on his sleep apnea condition.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011913

    Original file (20070011913.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC), as established by Section 1413a, Title 10, United States Code, as amended, provides for the payment of the amount of money a military retiree would receive from the VA for combat related disabilities if it wasn’t for the statutory prohibition for a military retiree to receive a VA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001222C070206

    Original file (20050001222C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Member Ms. Linda D. Simmons Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant concludes that his years of exposure to the noise of weapons fire caused his hearing loss, and weapons fire is combat related. The denial means that he will not be compensated for his hearing loss (and other service related disabilities not approved for CRSC) in the first group of military retirees being given this compensation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001222C070206

    Original file (20050001222C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Linda D. Simmons | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant concludes that his years of exposure to the noise of weapons fire caused his hearing loss, and weapons fire is combat related. The denial means that he will not be compensated for his hearing loss (and other service related disabilities not approved for CRSC) in the first group of military retirees being given this compensation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010790

    Original file (20080010790.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence which shows that his medical conditions were sustained during combat action or simulation of war. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship between the applicant’s VA rated disabilities and war or the simulation of war,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005518

    Original file (20120005518.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * 52 Standard Forms 600 (Health Record – Chronological Record of Medical Care) * Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings * Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision * denial letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command CRSC Branch * appeal for CRSC and request form CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of service creditable for Reserve retirement at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002623 C070206

    Original file (20050002623 C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Brenda K. Koch | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states that he lost his hearing during the Korean War on Heart Break Ridge while serving as an artillery sergeant. Due to cost constraints, while all military retirees will eventually receive concurrent receipt of VA disability compensation, only those military retirees who have disabilities incurred in combat, or in conditions simulating combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003070C070206

    Original file (20050003070C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Robert Rogers | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC), as established by Section 1413a, Title 10, United States Code, as amended, states that eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of service creditable for reserve retirement at age 60) and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002876C070205

    Original file (20060002876C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Peguine M. Taylor | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.