RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 15 FEBRUARY 2005
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001573
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.
Mr. Carl W. S. Chun
Director
Ms. Deborah L. Brantley
Senior Analyst
The following members, a quorum, were present:
Ms. Jennifer Prater
Chairperson
Mr. Thomas Pagan
Member
Mr. Kenneth Lapin
Member
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request for award of the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states he recently received the Boards Record of Proceedings denying him award of the Purple Heart. He states that while the Board added two bronze service stars to the Asiatic Pacific Service Medal recorded on his separation document, in actuality he states he participated in four combat locations; Leyte, Luzon, New Guinea, and Okinawa.
3. The applicant expanded the statement in his original application regarding his combat injury and states that he walked to an aid station under his own power, despite the pain he had from the shell that landed almost next to him. He states that medical personnel ignored him because they saw no blood on him. He states he returned to the aid station the following day and was ignored again.
4. The applicant submits a copy of an order awarding him the Bronze Star Medal for heroic achievement and notes that the award shows that he was under enemy fire. He states that he knows the Japanese were shooting 75 and 150 millimeter shells at [him], and too many landed too close to [him]. He notes that there were many instances in combat that no words were written and questions the amount of time members of the Board have spent in combat.
5. The applicant provides a copy of his Bronze Star Medal order in support of his request.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR2004106629, on 21 December 2004.
2. The applicants Bronze Star Medal order constitutes new evidence which was not previously seen by the Board and as such, warrants consideration.
3. On 23 April 1945 the applicant was awarded a Bronze Star Medal for heroic achievement in military operations against the enemy
on 10-12 January 1945. The award narrative indicates that the applicant voluntarily went forward to advanced infantry observation posts outside the perimeter for the purpose of furnishing continued naval gunfire throughout the night. It stated that on another night the applicant volunteered with his men and moved up the enemy held hill and laid a double line of communication wire back to his radio in order to insure uninterrupted communications and that for two hours, deep in enemy territory and subject to being cut off and annihilated, he observed enemy gun flashes and successfully directed naval gunfire. The award makes no mention of the applicant, a Field Artillery officer, being wounded as a result of hostile action.
4. A further review of Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-1, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, indicates that the applicants unit, the 75th Joint Assault Signal Company, was credited with participation in the Leyte Campaign, the Luzon Campaign, the New Guinea Campaign, and the Ryukyus Campaign. The Ryukyus Campaign was the official name of the campaign which the applicant refers to as the battle for Okinawa.
5. The applicants separation document reflects participation in the Southern Philippines, New Guinea, and Ryukyus Campaigns. Bronze service stars on the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal, which is recorded as the Asiatic Pacific Service Medal on the applicants separation document, are intended to denote campaign participation. A silver service star is worn in lieu of five bronze service stars.
6. As a matter of information, the Board members, and members of its staff, have a myriad of military experience and backgrounds. Many of the current members have had extensive and personal combat experiences dating back to the Korean War, including several individuals with decorations for valor.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. Although the applicants award of the Bronze Star Medal further confirms the applicants active participation in ground combat, it does not offer any additional evidence which confirms that he was wounded in action. The evidence does confirm that the applicant was a Field Artillery officer and the decision by the Department of Veterans Affairs to grant the applicant disability compensation for a service connected hearing loss is consistent with the hearing trauma a Field Artillery officer would have experienced during military service. It does not however, confirm entitlement to an award of the Purple Heart.
2. The applicants frustration in not being able to secure an award that he believes he is entitled to is understandable. However, the Board can assure him that his combat participation and military achievements are not in question. Unfortunately, the fact that he may be receiving disability compensation for a hearing condition, which the Department of Veterans Affairs has determined resulted from his military service does not serve as evidence for an award of the Purple Heart.
3. Evidence shows that the applicants records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, administrative correction of the applicants records will be accomplished by the Case Management Support Division (CMSD), St. Louis, Missouri, as outlined by the Board in paragraph 2 of the Board Determination/Recommendation section below.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___JP __ ___TP __ ___KL __ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR2004106629, dated 21 December 2004.
2. The Board determined that administrative error in the records of the individual should be corrected. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show award of the Bronze Star Medal for heroic achievement, participation in the Leyte and Luzon Campaigns, and entitlement to a silver service star on his Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal denoting participation in five designated campaign periods, in lieu of two bronze stars denoting participation in only two campaign periods.
___ Jennifer Prater ____
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
CASE ID
AR20050001573
SUFFIX
RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
20050215
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
107.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001573C070206
Although the applicant’s award of the Bronze Star Medal further confirms the applicant’s active participation in ground combat, it does not offer any additional evidence which confirms that he was wounded in action. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show award of the Bronze Star Medal for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710400C070209
While the report of separation reflects that the applicant served in New Guinea, Luzon and the Western Pacific, other documents indicate that the applicants unit also served in Okinawa and Japan. The applicant served in four designated campaign periods, Leyte, Luzon, New Guinea, and Ryukyus and is entitled to four bronze service stars and he is entitled to the Army of Occupation Medal with Japan clasp. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710400
While the report of separation reflects that the applicant served in New Guinea, Luzon and the Western Pacific, other documents indicate that the applicant’s unit also served in Okinawa and Japan. The applicant served in four designated campaign periods, Leyte, Luzon, New Guinea, and Ryukyus and is entitled to four bronze service stars and he is entitled to the Army of Occupation Medal with Japan clasp. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003069
Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards, campaign, and assault credits received by units serving during World War II. By letter dated 9 June 2005, the National Personnel Records Center informed the applicant he would be sent a number of awards; however, a bronze service star for the Philippine Liberation Ribbon was not listed as one of those awards/appurtenances. Based on the authorized campaigns of New Guinea,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001605C070206
The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show that he enlisted in the Army on 26 September 1942; that he participated in campaigns in the Aleutians, Marshall Islands, Philippines, and Ryukyus; that he was on occupation duty in Korea; that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for heroic achievement; that he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 28 May 1943, and the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 12 November 1944; and that he was awarded the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001605C070206
The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show that he enlisted in the Army on 26 September 1942; that he participated in campaigns in the Aleutians, Marshall Islands, Philippines, and Ryukyus; that he was on occupation duty in Korea; that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for heroic achievement; that he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 28 May 1943, and the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 12 November 1944; and that he was awarded...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005332
The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) to show: * his participation in the Leyte and Lingayen Gulf battles in the Philippines * his participation in the Army of Occupation of Japan 2. Based on his award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, he is entitled to award of the Bronze Star Medal and correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 to show this award. He served qualifying periods of service for award of the World...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063125C070421
Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register), dated 6 July 1961, will show whether or not a World War II unit was authorized occupation credit and, thus, entitlement to the Army Occupation Medal. The evidence of record also indicates the applicant is entitled to the AOM with Japan Clasp and credit for participation in the Luzon Campaign. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by issuing to the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000878
The changes to the names for the awards listed on the WD AGO Form 53-55 are as follows: * American Defense Service Ribbon - is now called a Medal * the Good Conduct Ribbon - is now called a Medal * Asiatic-Pacific Ribbon - now known as the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal * Purple Heart remains unchanged * the Distinguished Unit Badge - is now known as the Presidential Unit Citation * Combat Infantryman qualification - is now shown as an award of the Combat Infantryman Badge * the Lapel...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067167C070402
Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his military records to show the unit citation. The applicant received an award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) prior to his separation from active duty on 26 January 1946, however, his records do not depict it as a valor award. a. by awarding the individual concerned the awards of the Purple Heart for injuries received on 7 June 1945, the Bronze Star Medal with one oak leaf cluster for meritorious service during World War II and the Philippine...