Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001554C070206
Original file (20050001554C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        13 OCTOBER 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050001554


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Deborah L. Brantley           |     |Senior Analyst       |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Ted Kanamine                  |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Patrick McGann                |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Carol Kornhoff                |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or
Discharge) be corrected to show his rank and pay grade as private first
class    E-3, in lieu of private E-2.

2.  The applicant states that his military pay voucher shows that he was
promoted to pay grade E-3 on 19 July 1966.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his military pay voucher.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
which occurred on 1 August 1966.  The application submitted in this case is
dated       20 January 2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Army for 3 years on 30 July 1963.  He was
trained as a water supply specialist and in December 1963 was assigned to
an engineer battalion in Germany.  He was advanced to pay grade E-3 on 7
May 1964.  He was reduced to private E-1 on 17 July 1964 by a special court-
martial and sentenced to be confined at hard labor for 4 months.  The
applicant’s Enlisted Qualification record shows that he was in confinement
from 17 July 1964 to 26 July 1964, and that he was AWOL (absent without
leave) from 5 February 1965 to 9 February 1965.  His Official Military
Personnel File (OMPF) shows that he received nonjudicial punishment under
Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) on 4 occasions, the
last being on 21 February 1966 when he was reduced to pay grade E-2.

4.  On 18 March 1966 the applicant was barred from reenlistment.  On 5 July
1966 the applicant’s bar to reenlistment was withdrawn based on his
commanding officer’s recommendation.

5.  Headquarters Company, 24th Engineer Battalion Unit Orders Number 24,
show that the applicant was appointed to the permanent grade of private
first class E-3 on 19 July 1966.

6.  The applicant returned to the United States and was released from
active duty at Fort Hamilton, New York on 1 August 1966.  His DD Form 214
shows his rank and pay grade as private E-2 and his date of rank as 21
February 1966.

7.  The copy of the applicant’s pay voucher that he submits with his
request contains the notation that the applicant was promoted to pay grade
E-3 19 July 1966 per SO (special order) number 24.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant’s rank, pay grade, and date of rank on his 1 August 1966
       DD Form 214 are incorrect.  He was appointed to the rank of private
first class, pay grade E-3 on 19 July 1966.  His DD Form 214 should reflect
this information.
BOARD VOTE:

__TK ___  __PM ___  __CK ___  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.  As a
result, the Board recommends that the applicant’s 1 August 1966 DD Form 214
be corrected by showing his rank and pay grade as private first class, E-3,
and his date of rank as 19 July 1966.




                            ______Ted Kanamine________
                                      CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050001554                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20051013                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |110.00                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001554C070206

    Original file (20050001554C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his military pay voucher shows that he was promoted to pay grade E-3 on 19 July 1966. The copy of the applicant’s pay voucher that he submits with his request contains the notation that the applicant was promoted to pay grade E-3 19 July 1966 per SO (special order) number 24. As a result, the Board recommends that the applicant’s 1 August 1966 DD Form 214 be corrected by showing his rank and pay grade as private first class, E-3, and his date of rank as 19 July 1966.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008735

    Original file (20090008735.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his 3 January 1966 DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his service in Thailand and France/Germany. The applicant's DA Form 20 shows that he served in France from 14 March 1960 to 17 February 1963 and Thailand from 30 October 1964 to 24 August 1965. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his 3 January 1966 DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018002

    Original file (20090018002.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows he served in Vietnam from on or about 23 September 1969 to 22 September 1970; therefore, he served a qualifying period for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073879C070403

    Original file (2002073879C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 14 October 1963, the applicant was ordered to appear before a board of officers to be convened on 30 October 1963 to determine if he should be discharged from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208. The Board noted the applicant’s letter and other complimentary letters of support which the applicant submitted with his application; however, these...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084737C070212

    Original file (2003084737C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The convening authority approved the sentence on 28 August; but the execution thereof was suspended until he was released from confinement. This regulation provides that a soldier will be given a dishonorable discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general court-martial empowered to impose a dishonorable discharge. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019030

    Original file (20100019030.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * total foreign service * award of the Purple Heart and Vietnam Service Medal * last rank and pay grade as specialist four (SP4)/E-4 2. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) prepared from temporary records on 23 May 1969 shows: * item 31 (Foreign Service) – arrival date in Vietnam not indicated and departure date from Vietnam as 24 May 1969 * item 33...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008589

    Original file (20140008589.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). However, his DD Form 214 does not show this overseas service. The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his overseas service in Thailand.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087830C070212

    Original file (2003087830C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 1 April 1966, the applicant accepted NJP for being absent from his unit on 23 March 1966. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024773

    Original file (20110024773.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Decorations and Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008404

    Original file (20080008404.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Court found him guilty of all charges and specifications and sentenced him to 30 days of confinement at hard labor, a forfeiture of $75.00 pay for 1 month, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. On 29 September 1965, the applicant’s immediate commander recommended the applicant be eliminated from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 (Personnel Separations), citing the applicant’s record of disciplinary problems. On 10 December 1965, the applicant acknowledged...