RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 13 OCTOBER
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001553
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mr. Ronald DeNoia | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. Ted Kanamine | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Patrick McGann | |Member |
| |Ms. Carol Kornhoff | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states he was wounded in action in Germany. He states
that he was treated in a field hospital in Germany in June or August of
1943 or 1944. He also states that it would be in the best interest of the
combat veteran to be awarded the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant provides no documentation in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged injustice which
occurred on 24 November 1945. The application submitted in this case is
dated 13 January 2005.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. The applicant was inducted into the Army on 2 April 1941 and was
awarded the military occupation specialty (MOS) 059 (Foreman Construction).
The applicant served until 24 November 1945 when he was separated with an
honorable discharge.
4. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for
review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records
at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. It is believed that the
applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire. However, there
were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board
to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.
5. Item 34 (Wounds Received in Action) of the applicant's WD AGO 53-55
(Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) shows the
entry "None."
6. The hospital record provided by the Office of the Surgeon General shows
that the applicant was treated in a medical facility on 19 April 1945 for a
lacerated ear. The hospital records also show that the type of case was
"Non-battle Injury" and circumstances were "Non-battle injuries."
7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part,
that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of
hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that
the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required
treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been
made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily
appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to
submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. Records show that the applicant's injury was not the result of hostile
action. Therefore, he is not entitled to award of the Purple Heart.
3. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 24 November 1945, the date of his
separation from active duty. The ABCMR was not established until 2 January
1947. As a result, the time for the applicant to file a request for
correction of any error or injustice expired on 1 January 1950. However,
the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has
not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be
in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____TK _ ___PM __ ___CK __ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
2. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law. Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.
______Ted Kanamine______________
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20050001553 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |2005/10/13 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |HONORABLE |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |1946/11/01 |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR 615-335 |
|DISCHARGE REASON |DEMOB |
|BOARD DECISION |DENY |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY |AR 18-185 |
|ISSUES 1. |107.0015.0000 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001553C070206
In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. The applicants military records are not available to the Board for review. As a result, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 1 January 1950.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007851C070206
The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020876
Item 33 (Decorations and Citations) of his WD AGO Form 53-55 does not show award of the Purple Heart. d. A copy of a WD AGO Form 55, dated 4 May 1945, showing he suffered a perforating wound of the left chest on 24 April 1945 and that he underwent an operation on the same day. Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel for those wounds or injuries, and that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004860C070206
The applicant's military service records do not contain any general orders awarding him the Purple Heart. A preponderance of records in this case shows the applicant was wounded in action on 25 April 1945 in Germany and he was awarded the Purple Heart for these wounds by the 119th General Hospital on 28 April 1945. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003873C070206
The applicant states, in effect, that he did not receive the Purple Heart during World War II. The applicant submitted duplicate applications for correction of his records to the Board, each with self-authored statements outlining his request for award of the Purple Heart; and a certificate of military service he received from the National Personnel Records Center, National Archives and Records Administration; in support of his request. The evidence of record, NA Forms 13038, Certificate...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106131C070208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 August 2004 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004106131 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010365
The material evidence presented to the VA shows that the applicant was wounded on 28 March 1945 by an accidental discharge from a U.S. Army Soldier's pistol. Army Regulation 600-45 (Decorations), then in effect, which governed the award of Army decorations until 23 August 1951, stated the Purple Heart was awarded to citizens of the United States serving with the Army, who are wounded in action against an enemy of the United States, or as a direct result of an act of such enemy, provided...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015212
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides a letter, dated 5 June 2007, from a Member of Congress; a letter, dated 2 May 2007, from the Military Awards Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, to a Member of Congress; an excerpt pertaining to the Purple Heart from Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards); a letter, dated 21 November 2007, from the U.S. Army and Joint Services Records Research Center, Alexandria,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022323
Frostbite or trench foot injuries were also examples of injuries or wounds which clearly do not justify award of the Purple Heart DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows no combat wounds were recorded on his separation document. As he was not treated for a combat injury, there is no basis for awarding him the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000650
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states: * he would like to be awarded the Purple Heart for being injured while serving during World War II * he was injured twice during the war, once in France and once in the Philippines * he received a "Bronze Star" for his actions 3. The Purple Heart requires evidence to verify: * the wound the result of hostile action * treatment of the wound by military medical personnel *...