Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000880C070206
Original file (20050000880C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:       
	 

	BOARD DATE:           19 October 2005                   
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050000880


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  


Mr. Carl W. S. Chun

Director

Mr. Joseph A. Adriance 

Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:


Ms. Barbara J. Ellis

Chairperson

Mr. Hubert O. Fry

Member

Mr. Robert Rogers 

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:  

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the total amount of his enlistment bonus to $14,000.00, and adjustment of his recoupment debt accordingly.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his enlistment contract confirms he was entitled to an enlistment bonus $14,000.00.  However, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) established his recoupment debt based on an enlistment bonus amount of $11,000.00.  He understands he is required to pay back the unearned portion of his bonus, but it should be based on the correct enlistment bonus amount, which would make his debt smaller.  

3.  The applicant provides a Statement for Enlistment (DA Form 3286-59) and Applicant Information Sheet in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 

1.  The applicant’s record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army for 4 years and entered active duty on 10 August 2001.  A DA Form 3286-59, dated 5 July 2001, prepared on the applicant during his enlistment processing confirms he was enlisting for the United States Army Incentive Enlistment Program, Option 9C, which authorized a $14,000.00 cash bonus.  

2.  A Statement of Understanding - Army Policy (USAREC Form 1150-R-E on file also confirms the applicant enlisted for a cash bonus of $14,000.00 in accordance with Headquarters, Department of the Army Message 241535Z, May 2001, for military occupational specialty 11X (Infantry), for 4 years.  

3.  On 20 November 2003, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of chapter 18, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of weight control failure.  The separation document (DD Form 214) he was issued upon his separation confirms he completed a total of 2 years, 3 months and 11 days of active military service.  

4.  The DFAS notified the applicant regarding recoupment of the unearned portion of enlistment bonus based on his early separation.  A review of the DFAS debt file on the applicant confirms the recoupment debt of $2,176.44 was based on an enlistment bonus of $11,000.00 and the posting of the pay account establishing the bonus entitlement as $11,000.00.  DFAS further confirms that if recoupment were based on an enlistment bonus amount of $14,000.00, the applicant’s debt would be less.  

5.  In connection with the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief Incentives and Budget Branch, Enlisted Accessions Division, Officer of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1.  This Department of the Army (DA) official indicates that a review of the applicable bonus messages for the date of the applicant’s enlistment, 10 August 2001, confirms the correct bonus amount is $14,000.00.  He further indicates that the applicant’s enlistment documentation confirms the applicant enlisted for 4 years for a $14,000.00 enlistment bonus.  

6.  On 4 May 2005, the applicant was provided a copy of the DA G-1 advisory opinion in order to have the opportunity to respond.  To date, he has failed to reply.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s request that the total amount of his enlistment cash bonus, upon which his recoupment debt is based be corrected to show a total cash bonus of $14,000.00, and the supporting documentation he submitted was carefully considered and found to have merit.  

2.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant was authorized a total cash bonus of $14,000.00 in connection with his enlistment in the Army, as confirmed by the applicant’s enlistment contract and associated documents and verified by the DA G-1 advisory opinion.  

3.  The record further shows that the DFAS properly processed a bonus recoupment action based on the applicant’s early separation; however, DFAS erroneously used a cash bonus amount of $11,000.00 in establishing the applicant’s recoupment debt.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the DFAS record to show the applicant’s authorized enlistment cash bonus amount is $14,000.00, and to adjust his recoupment debt accordingly.  

BOARD VOTE:

___BSE_  __HOF __  __RR___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was authorized an enlistment cash bonus of $14,000.00; by adjusting DFAS records to show his recoupment debt is based on a total cash bonus amount of $14,000.00, rather than $11,000.00; and by adjusting his recoupment debt accordingly.  




		____Barbara J. Ellis______
		        CHAIRPERSON





INDEX

CASE ID
AR20050000880
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
2005/10/19
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE
2003/11/20
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR 635-200 
DISCHARGE REASON
Weight Control Failure
BOARD DECISION
GRANT 
REVIEW AUTHORITY
Mr. Schneider
ISSUES         1.
128.0500
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000880C070206

    Original file (20050000880C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    This Department of the Army (DA) official indicates that a review of the applicable bonus messages for the date of the applicant’s enlistment, 10 August 2001, confirms the correct bonus amount is $14,000.00. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was authorized a total cash bonus of $14,000.00 in connection with his enlistment in the Army, as confirmed by the applicant’s enlistment contract and associated documents and verified by the DA G-1 advisory opinion. Therefore, it would be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008382

    Original file (20060008382.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: a. On 6 May 2003, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel Separations), chapter 5-13, by reason of a personality disorder. Based on the Army G-1 opinion and the in the interest of justice, it would now be appropriate to correct the record to show that applicant requested and was granted a waiver of recoupment of his unearned portion of his bonus incentive prior to his discharge from the Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011743

    Original file (20080011743.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the applicant has not contended that he was unaware of the conditions of his contract, the evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant understood the conditions of his ROTC contract, whereas he could elect to repay his scholarship debt in lieu of being involuntarily ordered to active duty in the rank/grade of private (PV1)/E-1 for a period not to exceed 4 years in the Army. If the applicant fails to complete the period of enlisted service he would have been obligated as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103199C070208

    Original file (2004103199C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his ROTC discharge orders; his DA Form 3286-59 (Statement for Enlistment United States Army Enlistment Program U. S. Army Delayed Enlistment Program); and an account statement from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) with a billing date of 13 January 2004. That Command noted that the applicant's voluntary enlisted service in the Army was not an authorized remedy for debt repayment under the terms of his ROTC contract and recommended that his voluntary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089888C070403

    Original file (2003089888C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: The applicant states, in effect, that he enlisted in the Army in order to take advantage of the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) and after completing his training he was informed that his loans did not qualify for payment under the LRP. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record, any basis for suspending or remitting the debt owed the government for the unearned portion of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012535C071029

    Original file (20060012535C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, a. a change to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, to omit time lost he accumulated due to AWOL (absence without leave) and payment for this time; b. payment for 21.5 days accrued leave for which he was not paid on his discharge from the Army; c. reimbursement for taxes that were deducted from his pay at discharge; d. reimbursement for money he contributed to the Montgomery GI Bill Program which he feels he is entitled to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005807C070206

    Original file (20050005807C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Separation for personality disorder is not appropriate when disability separation processing through the Army’s PDES is warranted. This official further states that the governing regulation is currently being staffed with a revision that would not authorize bonus recoupment in personality disorder cases. The evidence of record, as established in the original Record of Proceedings issued by the Board in October 2004, confirms the applicant’s separation processing was accomplished in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012016

    Original file (20140012016.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * she was only granted a bonus with her initial enlistment * she was never granted a bonus upon her reenlistment * the paperwork for the bonus was not processed until her reenlistment * she never actually received the bonus money, but incurred a debt nonetheless * her final pay upon Army discharge was withheld due to this debt 3. The advisory opinion states the $6,000.00 bonus was a seasonal bonus for the airborne specific option, clearly affiliated with the airborne...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009910C070208

    Original file (20040009910C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that recoupment of the unearned portion of her enlistment bonus be waived. The commanding officer recommended separation with an honorable discharge. Accordingly as recommended in the advisory opinion the applicant should not be required to forfeit that portion of the bonus already received.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004612C070205

    Original file (20060004612C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Peguine Taylor | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The advisory opinion stated that the applicant's current active duty service is not the result of being ordered to active duty through ROTC channels in satisfaction of his ROTC contractual obligation. The applicant’s ROTC debt totaled $11,946.10.