Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105593C070208
Original file (2004105593C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:           6 January 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR2004105593


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Joseph A. Adriance            |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Fred Eichorn                  |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Richard T. Dunbar             |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Yolanda Maldonado             |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, reinstatement of “Former Spouse”
Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he and his former wife of 23
years were divorced on 27 September 2002.  He states the divorce decree
called for him to provide continued SBP coverage for his wife and he mailed
the divorce decree to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) in
October 2002, which he believed complied with notification requirements.
He further states that unfortunately, he did not follow-up to ensure the
document was received and included in his records and just presumed the
requirements for continued former spouse coverage were met.  This
assumption was further supported by the fact that SBP premiums have
continued to be deducted from his retired pay.  He states that the SBP
annuity will be the only source of income for his former spouse once he
dies and he kept the SBP benefit for her because she is
18 years younger than him and will probably outlive him.  Further, she will
need the SBP annuity to survive given she suffers from an arthritic
conditions and a spinal problem, and is very limited in what she can do.
He concludes by stating that he has faithfully paid the SBP premiums since
his retirement in 1987 and requests the SBP coverage be continued for his
former spouse, as required by his divorce decree.

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored statement, divorce decree and
separation agreement in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant’s record shows that he was released from active duty for
the purpose of length of service retirement on 30 June 1987.  At the time,
he held the rank of colonel and he had completed 30 years and 27 days of
active military service.

2.  On 21 May 1987, during his retirement processing, the applicant
completed a Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel (DA Form 4240).  In
this document, he elected “Spouse Only” SBP coverage at a reduced amount of
$1300.  His now former spouse was his wife at the time and she completed a
statement concurring with the applicant’s reduced amount coverage election.


3.  On 18 June 2002, the applicant and his former spouse entered into a
separation agreement that provided for the applicant to maintain SBP
coverage for his spouse until his death.  On 27 September 2002, a Decree of
Dissolution of Marriage was issued by the Combined Court of Jefferson
County, Colorado.  This decree indicated that both parties would perform
the applicable provisions of the separation agreement they had entered
into.

4.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions of
the USFSPA relating to the SBP.  It permits a person who, incident to a
proceeding of divorce, is required by court order to elect to provide an
annuity to a former spouse to make such an election.  If that person fails
or refuses to make such an election, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits the
former spouse concerned to make a written request that such an election be
deemed to have been made.  Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election
may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former
spouse of the person is received within one year of the date of the court
order or filing involved.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  By law, incident to a proceeding of divorce, a member has one year to
provide an annuity to a former spouse by making such an election.  The law
also permits the former spouse concerned to request a former spouse SBP
coverage election be deemed to have been made within one year of a date of
a court-order of divorce.

2.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant and his former spouse
were divorced on 27 September 2002.  The divorce decree directed that both
parties comply with the terms of a separation agreement they had entered
into on
18 June 2002, which included continued SBP coverage for the applicant’s
former spouse.

3.  Further, the applicant confirms he forwarded a copy of the divorce
decree to DFAS in October 2002 and SBP premiums have continued to be
collected from his retired pay.  It is clear the applicant’s intent was to
provide continued SBP coverage for his former spouse, as evidenced by the
separation agreement and divorce decree.  It further appears he believed he
complied with divorce notification and former spouse SBP election within
one year of his divorce, as evidenced by his forwarding his divorce decree
to DFAS within a month of his divorce.  As a result, given the 23 year
marriage of the applicant and his former spouse and the applicant’s clear
intent to provide his former spouse continued SBP coverage, it would serve
the interest of justice, compassion and equity to grant the requested
relief.
BOARD VOTE:

___FE___  __RTD __  __ YM __  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by
showing he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan election from “Spouse” to
“Former Spouse” on 27 September 2002, the date of his divorce.




            ____Fred Eichorn______
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2004105593                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |2005/01/06                              |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |N/A                                     |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |N/A                                     |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |N/A                                     |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |N/A                                     |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |137.0000                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001066

    Original file (20100001066.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage at the time of their divorce and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The applicant contends the records of her deceased former spouse should be corrected to show that he changed his SBP coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage pursuant to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013769

    Original file (20060013769.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM failed to comply with the court order to maintain the SBP coverage on the applicant as his "Former Spouse," and the applicant failed to request a deemed election be made within one year of the divorce. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Given the SBP coverage election was a matter of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018252

    Original file (20130018252.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the records of her late husband, a former service member (FSM), to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election from spouse to former spouse. Since there is no current spouse with a vested interest, it would be appropriate as a matter of equity to correct the FSM's records to show he requested to change his SBP election from spouse to former spouse within one year of his divorce and this election was timely received and processed by DFAS,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009877C070208

    Original file (20040009877C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election to former spouse coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The law also permits the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017562

    Original file (20110017562.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * she and the FSM gave the best years of their lives to the Army * the only reason she divorced the FSM is because of what Operation Desert Storm did to him; he came back a different man * their divorce decree clearly stipulated that she was to be the beneficiary under the SBP at the FSM's expense * the FSM paid SBP premiums from his retired pay each and every month * in spite of their divorce, she and the FSM spoke at least once a week * when the FSM knew he was dying...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000357

    Original file (20100000357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SBP Coverage section of the document shows the spouse's date of birth as 27 January 1957. The SBP Coverage section of the document shows the spouse's date of birth as 4 November 1961. The evidence of record shows the applicant remarried and his second spouse (C_____ A. Y____) became eligible for the spouse SBP coverage, as SBP coverage is governed by category; however, they also later divorced There is no evidence of record to show the applicant took any action to request a change to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011503

    Original file (20140011503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the former spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's records to show she is the eligible beneficiary to receive a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity as a former spouse. Although the applicant's DOB is shown in the SBP section of the FSM's Retiree Account Statement, there is no evidence of record that shows the FSM changed his SBP category from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage. There is also no evidence that the applicant notified DFAS in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000247

    Original file (20100000247.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant and Executrix of the FSM's estate contend the FSM's records should be corrected to show he participated in the SBP with former spouse coverage because the final judgment of the divorce decree awarded the applicant the FSM's SBP as a former spouse and the FSM attempted to notify DFAS of this on several occasions. d. Thus, the evidence of record shows that neither the FSM nor the applicant took the necessary action to change the FSM's SBP election from spouse to former spouse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003460

    Original file (20090003460.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The evidence of record confirms the FSM initially elected SBP coverage for “spouse and children” at the time of his retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028423

    Original file (20100028423.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election to former spouse coverage or reinstatement of his former spouse's SBP coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The law also permits the former spouse...