Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104608C070208
Original file (2004104608C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:            23 November 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER:   AR2004104608


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mrs. Nancy L. Amos                |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Fred N. Eichorn               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. John T. Meixell               |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Robert J. Osborn              |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the records of her deceased spouse, a
former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate
in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse coverage.

2.  The applicant states that, when the FSM retired from the Massachusetts
Army National Guard (MAARNG), he informed her that all paperwork was
complete, as per his superiors, and if anything happened to him she would
be eligible to receive his pension.  She believes the paperwork was
misplaced by his superiors at the time he retired, as had happened many
times during his 20 years of service.  She also knows that, with all the
stress he went through in recruiting and retention, he would be very upset
if he knew all his time, energy, and stress during those years would be
disregarded and not honored by the military.

3.  The applicant provides her marriage certificate and the FSM's death
certificate.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM was born on 27 December 1946.  After having had prior service,
he enlisted in the ARNG on 6 October 1974.  He was promoted to Sergeant
First Class, E-7 on 26 October 1981.  He and the applicant married around
1984.

2.  The FSM's notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-
year letter) is dated 2 January 1990.  A Survivor Benefit Plan Summary was
an enclosure to the letter.

3.  The FSM was separated from the ARNG on 15 November 1991 and transferred
to the Retired Reserve.  He died on 31 March 2003 at age 56.

4.  Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way
for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60
to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching
age 60.  Three options are available:  (A)  elect to decline enrollment and
choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B)  elect that a
beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment
of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C)  elect that a
beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age
60.  If death does occur before age 60, the RCSBP costs for options B and C
are deducted from the annuity.  At the time the applicant received his 20-
year letter, a member must have made the election within 90 days of
receiving the notification of eligibility to receive retired pay at age 60
or else wait until he/she applies for retired pay and elect to participate
in the standard SBP.  In other words, failure to elect an option resulted
in the default election of option A.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence of record to show that the FSM completed a DD Form
1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) electing to participate
in the RCSBP.  He would have completed this form around April 1990, within
90 days of receiving his 20-year letter, and not when he transferred to the
Retired Reserve in November 1991.  As a senior noncommissioned officer, the
FSM should have kept a copy of this important document for his own files if
and when it was completed.

2.  Regrettably, the applicant fails to provide any evidence that supports
her contention that the FSM completed the DD Form 1883 and/or that his
superiors in the MAARNG assured him that the paperwork was complete and
submitted.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__fne___  __jtm___  __rjo___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.




            __Fred N. Eichorn_____
                    CHAIRPERSON

                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2004104608                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20041123                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |137.01                                  |
|ISSUES         1.       |Mr. Chun                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030267

    Original file (20100030267.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her husband's record to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and elected her as the beneficiary. There is no evidence in the FSM's official military personnel file (OMPF), Defense Finance and Accounting Service record, or independent evidence which indicates the FSM ever completed a DD Form 1883 to enroll in the RCSBP. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011148C080407

    Original file (20070011148C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant further states that the FSM's original Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 Letter (20-Year Letter) and Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate (DD Form 1883) were not found in his records; however, she found copies of his 20 January 1999 20-Year Letter and an Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) Letter, dated 22 March 2000, which notified her that the FSM had failed to submit a DD Form 1883 within the prescribed timeframe and that she was therefore...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002070

    Original file (20080002070.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Public Law 95-397, the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement, but were not yet age 60, to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. The evidence of record shows that the FSM completed 20 years, 8 months, and 8 days of qualifying service for retired...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016420C070206

    Original file (20050016420C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 24 September 1989, the FSM died at age 51. There is no evidence of record to show the FSM completed a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate), one of which should have been sent to him, with a cover letter, by mail around July 1979. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing he completed a DD Form 1883 on 1 July 1979 and elected to participate in the RCSBP for spouse coverage, full...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059181C070421

    Original file (2001059181C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    By memorandum dated 6 June 2001, the unit’s commander confirmed that the FSM had enrolled in the RCSBP in December 1993, electing option C. Upon his death, the applicant had filled out the appropriate paperwork and submitted her claim to receive the annuity (although it appears the DD Form 1883 was submitted rather than an application for annuity, DD Form 1884). However, instead of informing the applicant that she had to submit a DD Form 1884, ARPERCEN told the applicant that she was not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001656

    Original file (20110001656.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her late husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for her at the time of his retirement. The applicant further provided a copy of a letter, dated 30 November 2010, from HRC, Retired Pay Branch, wherein she was advised that a review of her late husband's Reserve Component Survivor Benefit File found that he did not complete a DD Form 1883; therefore, she was ineligible...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011372

    Original file (20060011372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse only coverage. By letter, dated 15 March 2000, the applicant was informed the FSM failed to submit the DD Form 1883 and therefore his survivors would not receive an RCSBP annuity if he died before age 60. If the FSM had not received his 17 June 1998 20-year letter, the 15...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011215

    Original file (20060011215.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse only coverage. This letter states that the FSM received his 20-year letter on 22 June 1997 and that he did not make a selection for the SBP (DD Form 1883) because the FSM and his spouse were not counseled on their SBP options. Although the applicant contends that the FSM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010762

    Original file (20110010762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's record to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse coverage. Army Regulation 15-185 governs operations of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). The ABCMR has carefully reviewed the facts of this case and the evidence provided by the applicant and it was determined that no formal hearing is required.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076772C070215

    Original file (2002076772C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for former spouse coverage. On 10 August 1992, he completed a Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, DD Form 1883, and elected to participate in the RCSBP for spouse only coverage, full base amount, option C. He named the applicant as his spouse and indicated they were...