Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011372
Original file (20060011372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  22 February 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060011372 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  


Mr. Carl W. S. Chun

Director

Ms. Wanda L. Waller

Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. Mark Manning

Chairperson

Mr. John Meixell

Member

Mr. Qawiy Sabree

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence: 

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse only coverage.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM was not properly notified of the SBP options prior to his death.  She contends that the paperwork was sent to an old address even though the Department of the Army had their current address, at that time, which was ____ Shadow Bay Drive, Orlando, Florida, because the Army sent them a letter to the correct address during that time period.  A copy of the 17 June 1998 letter was just recently sent to her.  As a result, the FSM was never presented an opportunity to select any SBP option.   

3.  The applicant provides a Death Certificate; a Marriage Certificate; the FSM’s 20-year letter; a letter, dated 15 March 2000, from the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command, St. Louis, Missouri; and a copy of the FSM’s DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM was born on 25 October 1950.  He was inducted on 20 October 1970, served as a light weapons infantryman, and was released from active duty on 15 May 1972 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  He married the applicant on 15 April 1983.    

2.  The FSM's notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) is dated 17 June 1998.  Paragraph 4 of this letter pertains to the RCSBP and DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) and informed him that he had 90 calendar days from the date he received the letter to submit his DD Form 1883.  Records at the U.S. Army Human Resources Command - St. Louis indicate that the FSM's records did not contain a DD Form 1883.  The 20-year letter was addressed to the FSM at  ____ Ross Place, Orlando, Florida.   

3.  By letter, dated 15 March 2000, the applicant was informed the FSM failed to submit the DD Form 1883 and therefore his survivors would not receive an RCSBP annuity if he died before age 60.  The letter was addressed to her at ___ Shadow Bay Drive, Orlando, Florida.  

4.  The FSM died on 23 March 2006.  

5.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  

6.  Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60.  Three options are available:  (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60.  Before the law was amended in October 2000, a member must have made the election within 90 days of receiving the notification of eligibility to receive retired pay at age 60, or else wait until he/she applies for retired pay and elect to participate in the standard SBP.  In other words, failure to elect an option resulted in the default election of option A, decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions are noted.  However, the applicant provides insufficient evidence to show the FSM did not receive his 20-year letter in 1998.  There is no evidence to show the FSM ever attempted to enroll in the RCSBP at any time.  

2.  More importantly, it appears the applicant acknowledged that she (and presumably the FSM) received the 15 March 2000 letter informing her that the FSM failed to enroll in the RCSBP.  If the FSM had not received his 17 June 1998 20-year letter, the 15 March 2000 letter should have caused him to inquire where it was.  There is no evidence to show he made such an inquiry, and there is no evidence to show the 15 March 2000 letter caused the FSM to complain that he never had the option to enroll in the RCSBP.  Regrettably, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

MM____  _JM_____  __QS____  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



___Mark Manning___________
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060011372
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
20070222
TYPE OF DISCHARGE

DATE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE AUTHORITY

DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
137.0400
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064851C070421

    Original file (2001064851C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board finds the applicant’s contention that the FSM completed the DD Form 1883 reasonable. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the FSM completed the DD Form 1883 on 1 November 2000, electing to participate in the RCSBP for spouse and children coverage, full base amount, option C, and returned the form to the appropriate office where it was received and processed in a timely manner. That the applicant be paid an RCSBP annuity...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018205

    Original file (20120018205.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his records to show: * He timely submitted a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) * She is entitled to be paid the SBP annuity based on his death in 2002 2. The applicant provides: * Denial letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), dated 21 August 2012 * DD Form 2656-7 (Verification of Survivor Annuity), dated 28 July 2012 * Marriage license * Certificate of Death *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071049C070402

    Original file (2002071049C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074121C070403

    Original file (2002074121C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012089

    Original file (20100012089.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 November 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100012089 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. His next available enrollment would have been at age 60; however, he did not live to be 60 years old and now there are no RCSBP/SBP or retirement benefits for her. In a letter, dated 19 March 2010, the applicant states soon after the FSM's death she discovered she would not be entitled to survivor benefits or retirement benefits because the FSM failed to enroll in the RCSBP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022283

    Original file (20130022283 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse only coverage. Counsel requests the applicant's eligibility for an RCSBP annuity be established and that she be paid based on the DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate) submitted by the FSM. * the FSM completed 20 of years service and a 20-year letter was sent to him * he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022283

    Original file (20130022283.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse only coverage. Counsel requests the applicant's eligibility for an RCSBP annuity be established and that she be paid based on the DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate) submitted by the FSM. * the FSM completed 20 of years service and a 20-year letter was sent to him * he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101899C070208

    Original file (2004101899C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since he had elected children only coverage, he had to elect either option B or option C. If he were married, he and his spouse had to sign the reverse of the DD Form 1883. The available evidence of record shows that the FSM was not married to the applicant in May 1989; therefore, he could not have elected spouse coverage at that time. The available evidence of record shows that the FSM and the applicant married in October 1989; therefore, by the time the March 1992 letter was sent out...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021766

    Original file (20140021766.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. The applicant contends that the FSM's military records should be corrected to show she is eligible to receive an SBP annuity when the FSM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073900C070403

    Original file (2002073900C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states through counsel, in effect, that the FSM did complete and forward his DD Form 1883 early in 1987 but it was lost either by the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Center (now the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM)) or the U. S. Postal Service. If the member was married but elected not to participate at the maximum level or elected to provide an annuity for a dependent child but not for his spouse, that member’s spouse would be notified of that election. That...