Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104595C070208
Original file (2004104595C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        18 NOVEMBER 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR2004104595


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock             |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. James Hise                    |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Lester Echols                 |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Hubert Fry                    |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show award of
the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states that he was injured during an attack and
hospitalized for [an injury to] his right leg and knee.

3.  The applicant provides no evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
which occurred on 30 November 1991.  The application submitted in this case
is dated 28 January 2004.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Army for 2 years on 21 October 1969, and
served in Vietnam from 8 December 1970 to 2 July 1971 with Company D, 864th
Engineer Battalion as a power generator equipment operator.  He was
released from active duty at Fort Hood, Texas in the pay grade of E-4 on 27
August 1971, and transferred to the Army Reserve.  His DD Form 214 (Report
of Transfer or Discharge), in showing the reason for his transfer,
indicated that he was a member of a medical hold detachment who, upon
completion of hospitalization did not intend to immediately enlist or
reenlist in the Regular Army.  His             DD Form 214 does not show
award of the Purple Heart.

4.  The applicant reenlisted in the Army for 4 years on 24 September 1973
and was on continuous active duty until his retirement in November 1991.
He served in Southwest Asia from 2 October 1990 to 9 April 1991.

5.  The applicant's personnel qualification record contains the remark "Tri-
compartment OA right knee, run at own pace and distance."

6.  The Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register shows that
the 864th Engineer Battalion was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Civil
Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for its actions while the
applicant was assigned to that unit.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for
a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence
must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action,
the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have
been made a matter of official record.

8.  The Vietnam Casualty Roster maintained at this agency does not list the
applicant as being wounded in action.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states that he was injured during an attack; however,
does not provide evidence thereof, to include the circumstances of his
injuries.  Presumably, the applicant is requesting award of the Purple
Heart for injuries incurred in Vietnam, and while his 27 August 1971 DD
Form 214 indicates that he was a member of a medical holding detachment,
this in itself is not proof that he was wounded as a result of hostile
action; nor does the entry on his personnel qualification record suffice as
such evidence.

2.  There is no medical documentation to show that the applicant was
wounded in action.  Consequently, there is no basis for award of the Purple
Heart.

3.  The applicant has submitted neither probative evidence nor a convincing
argument in support of his request.

4.  The evidence shows that the applicant’s record contains administrative
error that does not require action by the Board.  The necessary corrections
will be accomplished administratively by the Case Management Support
Division (CMSD), St. Louis, Missouri, as outlined in paragraph 3 of the
Determination/Recommendation section below.

5.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 30 November 1991; therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on    29 November 1994.  However, the applicant did not
file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a
compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest
of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___JH___  ___LE __  ___HF __  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.

3.  The applicant is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil
Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation.  The Case Management
Division at St. Louis is requested to correct his records to reflect this
award.




                                  _______James Hise_________
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2004104595                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20041118                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |107.00                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016958C071029

    Original file (20060016958C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was credited with participation in five campaigns while in Vietnam; therefore, he is eligible to wear one silver service star on his Vietnam Service Medal. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain an administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 30 November 1987; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014124

    Original file (20110014124.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He completed 3 years of total active service. There is no record of any treatment for an eye injury while he was in Vietnam. His name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty listing, his DA Form 20 does not indicate any combat wounds, his available medical records do not indicate he was wounded and/or injured as a result of hostile action, and he did not submit any corroborating evidence to support award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021533

    Original file (20120021533.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against and enemy or as a result of hostile action. The applicant contends he should be awarded the Purple Heart because he was injured while serving in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070437C070402

    Original file (2002070437C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 14 January 1973 to show award of the Purple Heart. There is no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records that he was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004448C070208

    Original file (20040004448C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and reconsideration of his earlier appeal to correct his military records by award of the Bronze Star Medal. The evidence shows that the applicant’s record contains administrative error that does not require action by the Board. The Case Management Support Division in St. Louis is requested to correct the applicant’s records to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040004448lC070208

    Original file (040004448lC070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and reconsideration of his earlier appeal to correct his military records by award of the Bronze Star Medal. The evidence shows that the applicant’s record contains administrative error that does not require action by the Board. The Case Management Support Division in St. Louis is requested to correct the applicant’s records to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024823

    Original file (20110024823.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the applicant’s records and he has not provided any evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, that he was treated for such wounds by medical personnel, and that his treatment was made a matter of official record. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, in the absence of evidence that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, regrettably, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011292

    Original file (20080011292.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows the 864th Engineer Battalion was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974; and the Meritorious Unit Commendation (1 March 1967 to 31 December 1968), based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 39, dated 1970. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100478C070208

    Original file (2004100478C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 January 1968, he was transferred to Vietnam where he was assigned to the 18th Aviation Company. While the applicant did serve two tours in Vietnam, the available records are silent in regards to any wounds/injuries the applicant may have received in Vietnam as a result of hostile action. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013421

    Original file (20130013421.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His medical record is not available for review. In his statement, Mr. Cxxxxx states the following: As a combat medic of Company D 4th Division 1st of the 12th from 1967-1968 in the Republic of Vietnam, I remember Sergeant Hxxx Lxxxxxxx being wounded going up Hill 875. The applicant contends he should be awarded the Purple Heart; however, neither his available record nor the Vietnam casualty roster provide any evidence that shows he was wounded during his period of service in the Republic...