Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104275C070208
Original file (2004104275C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:           30 November 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR2004104275


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Joseph A. Adriance            |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. John N. Slone                 |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Shirley L. Powell             |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Patrick H. McGann             |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 30 (Military Occupational
Specialty and No) of his separation document WD AGO Form 53-55 be
corrected.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he served primarily in the Army
engineers and was only a commissary steward for a short period time at the
end of his enlistment.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his separation document in support of
his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of alleged error or injustice
that occurred on 4 January 1947.  The application submitted in this case is
dated 12 February 2004.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant’s record shows that he inducted into the Army and entered
active duty on 25 May 1945.  His Soldier’s Qualification Card (WD Form 20)
shows, in Item 27 (Classification in Military Specialties), that he was
awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 059 (Construction Foreman) on
8 October 1945 and was classified semi-skilled in this MOS.  On 27 October
1946, his was determined to be fully skilled in MOS 059.  The record does
not indicate the applicant was ever formally awarded the MOS 819
(Commissary Steward).

4.  The applicant’s record further shows that he was a member of the Combat
Engineers branch of service and that he served in the European Theater of
Operations (ETO) from 14 December 1945 through 27 March 1946.  It further
shows that during his tour of duty in the ETO, he was assigned to the
1015th Engineer Treadway Bridge Company.

5.  On 4 January 1947, the applicant was honorably separated after
completing
1 year, 7 months and 10 days of active military service.  Item 30 of his
separation document indicates he held the MOS 819 (Commissary Steward).
6.  Technical Manual 12-235, which prescribed the policy and procedure for
the preparation and distribution of separation documents during the period
in question, states that the MOS and Number held will be entered in Item
30.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s claim that he held an engineer MOS was carefully
considered and found to have merit.

2.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded MOS 059 on
8 October 1945.  Although he may have been working in MOS 819 at the time
of his separation, there is no indication that he was ever formally awarded
the MOS. As a result, it would be appropriate to correct Item 30 of his
separation document accordingly.

BOARD VOTE:

___JNS__  __SLP_ _  __PHM__  GRANT RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.  As a
result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the
individual concerned be corrected by amending Item 30 of his WD AGO Form 53-
55 by deleting the current entry and replacing it with the entry
“Construction Foreman (059)”; and by providing him a corrected separation
document that reflects this change.




            ____John N. Slone________
                    CHAIRPERSON

                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2004104275                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |2004/11/30                              |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |HD                                      |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |1947/01/04                              |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR 615-365                              |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |COFG                                    |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.  1021 |100.0000                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010134

    Original file (20110010134.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the records of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), to show battle and campaign credits, wounds received in action, and the Purple Heart. He states the FSM's discharge records do not show the proper entries for being wounded in action or the Purple Heart. The criteria for award of the Purple Heart specify that accidental injuries, unless caused by enemy fire, do not justify the award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019003

    Original file (20090019003.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In regard to the applicant's issue regarding eligibility of Army combat engineers, as a group, to receive combat-related badges and medals, such as the Bronze Star Medal, Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) sets forth procedures for processing requests for correction of military records. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the applicant the Army Commendation Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008011

    Original file (20080008011.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was wounded in his right hand on 30 March 1945, as a result of enemy action and received medical treatment for this wound. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding to him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 30 March 1945; b. showing, in addition to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018236

    Original file (20080018236.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge (WD AGO Form 53-55) to show award of the Army of Occupation Medal with Japan Clasp. This publication shows that the 1778th Engineer Construction Battalion, during the time of the applicant's assignment, was awarded the Army of Occupation Medal for service in Japan. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016500

    Original file (20110016500.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. The evidence shows he served as a construction foreman with the 299th Engineer Combat Battalion, as shown on his WD AGO Form 100. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * amending item 6 of his WD AGO Form 53-55 to show his unit of assignment as the 299th Engineer Combat Battalion * issuing him a corrected DD Form 256A to show his unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006151

    Original file (20080006151.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 34 (Wounds Received in Action), of the WD AGO Form 53-55, shows the entry, "None" to indicate the FSM was not wounded while he served in the EAME Theater. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant has provided insufficient evidence, which shows that the FSM was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded as a result of hostile action. ________x______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021277

    Original file (20110021277.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, as the son of the former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM’s WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) to show award of the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp. The applicant provides: * The FSM’s WD AGO Form 53-55 * Numerous copies of unit morning reports and unit orders from the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration * State of Texas Certificate of Death, dated 21 December 2001 * Army of the United...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018260

    Original file (20080018260.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 MARCH 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080018260 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. While the applicant does not dispute that he was awarded and held an engineer MOS and that he was assigned to an engineer unit, he believes that the role he served in combat reflects that of an infantryman and not an engineer. It is apparent from the applicant's description of his duties that his unit was primarily operating in its secondary role as infantrymen, rather...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004364C070206

    Original file (20050004364C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, these documents provide insufficient evidence upon which to authorize award of the Purple Heart. The evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show award of the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | AR20080017512

    Original file (AR20080017512.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The opinion does note that the exigencies of combat may require non-infantry Soldiers to temporarily perform the basic infantry duties that all Soldiers are taught but it is not a basis for the award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. Although the applicant was assigned to an Infantry Division, his lower-level assignment to Company A, 9th Armored Engineer Battalion shows he was not assigned to an infantry unit of brigade or regimental or smaller size, and his available record shows he was...