IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 16 February 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110016500
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) and his DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate) to show his unit of assignment as the 299th Engineer Combat Battalion.
2. The applicant states his discharge papers show his unit of assignment as the 299th Infantry [Regiment], which is incorrect. He states his discharge papers should show he served with the 299th Engineer Combat Battalion.
3. The applicant provides his WD AGO Form 53-55, DD Form 256A, and WD AGO Form 100 (Separation Qualification Record).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire. However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.
3. His WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 5 March 1943 and was honorably discharged on 8 December 1945. He served in World War II, in the European Theater of Operations, from on or about 18 April 1944 to on or about 27 November 1945.
a. Item 6 (Organization) shows he was assigned to the 299th Infantry [Regiment].
b. Item 30 (Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) and No [Number]) shows he held MOS 059 (Foreman, Construction).
c. Item 32 (Battles and Campaigns) shows he served in the Ardennes, Central Europe, Normandy, Northern France, and Rhineland campaigns.
d. Item 33 (Decorations and Citations) shows he was awarded the: American Service Medal [American Campaign Medal], Distinguished Unit Badge, European African Middle Eastern Service Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal, and the World War II Victory Medal.
4. His DD Form 256A shows he was separated at Fort Dix, NJ, on 8 December 1945. This form shows his unit of assignment as the 299th Infantry [Regiment].
5. He provided a WD AGO Form 100 that shows he was assigned to the 299th Engineer Battalion, in France, Belgium, Holland, Luxembourg, and Germany.
6. According to lineage and honors information cited on the U.S. Army Center for Military History (CMH) website, the 299th Engineer Battalion was constituted on 8 February 1943, in the Army of the United States, as the 299th Engineer Combat Battalion. It maintained this designation until 11 October 1954, when it was redesignated as the 299th Engineer Battalion.
7. There is no lineage and honors information pertaining to the 299th Infantry Regiment on the CMH website; however, a review of the regiment's history on Wikipedia.com reveals the regiment participated, in a limited capacity, in the Pacific theater during World War II, but was not credited with participating in the European theater during World War II.
8. Technical Manual 12-235 (Discharge Procedures and Preparation of Separation Forms), in effect at the time, specified in paragraph 24 that item 6 of the WD AGO Form 53-55 would have been completed as follows: Enter the last unit, or similar element to which he was assigned, rather than the element of which he was a part while moving to a separation activity. Assignments to units for purpose of transfer from a theater to the United States are considered part of the movement to a separation activity.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends his WD AGO Form 53-55 and DD Form 256A should be corrected to show he served with the 299th Engineer Combat Battalion.
2. The evidence shows he served as a construction foreman with the 299th Engineer Combat Battalion, as shown on his WD AGO Form 100. The evidence further shows the 299th Engineer Combat Battalion participated in campaigns in the European Theater of Operations; however, the 299th Infantry Regiment did not. Since the applicant was recognized for participation in 5 European campaigns, it is reasonable to conclude, when considering the entry on his WD AGO Form 100, he served in the 299th Engineer Combat Battalion. Therefore, it is also reasonable to conclude the organizational entry in item 6 of his WD AGO Form 53-55 is in error.
3. Accordingly, it would be appropriate to correct his WD AGO Form 53-55 and his DD Form 256A to show his unit of assignment as the 299th Engineer Combat Battalion.
BOARD VOTE:
____X___ __X____ ___X____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
* amending item 6 of his WD AGO Form 53-55 to show his unit of assignment as the 299th Engineer Combat Battalion
* issuing him a corrected DD Form 256A to show his unit of assignment as the 299th Engineer Combat Battalion
__________X_________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090012437
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110016500
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006011
Evidence does show that prior to the FSM becoming a prisoner of war he was assigned to the 168th Engineer Combat Battalion during a period of time the unit was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation and the Citation in the Order of the Day of the Belgian Army. Records show the FSM was returned to military control on 28 April 1945; his WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he departed the European theater of operations on 15 May 1945. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010134
The applicant requests correction of the records of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), to show battle and campaign credits, wounds received in action, and the Purple Heart. He states the FSM's discharge records do not show the proper entries for being wounded in action or the Purple Heart. The criteria for award of the Purple Heart specify that accidental injuries, unless caused by enemy fire, do not justify the award.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014564
x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). He also requests correction of his records to show he was assigned to the 36th Combat Engineer Regiment.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073937C070403
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the Belgian Fourragere. However, regulation requires that a unit must be cited two times in the Orders of the Day of the Belgian Army and that the Belgian Government must publish a special decree in order for a unit to receive award of the Belgian Fourragere. Based on the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to amend the applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55 to show award of the Belgian Fourragere or a Citation in the Orders of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014552
The applicant states, in effect, that the organization shown on his discharge document is incorrect and should be corrected to show that he served with Company B, 299th Engineer Combat Battalion during World War II. The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show award of the Arrowhead Device, Army of Occupation Medal with...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017497
The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Bronze Star Medal and that he was a Ranger with the 88th Infantry Division during his service in World War II (WW II). The evidence of record shows that the applicant served a qualifying period for award of the World War II Victory Medal and the American Campaign Medal. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his military records to show three bronze service stars to be affixed to his already-awarded...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079918C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. There are no orders for the Combat Medical Badge in the available records. However, there is no evidence available to the Board which shows the applicant was assigned to a medical unit which was organic to an infantry unit as required for award of the Combat Medical Badge during World War II.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100262C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Therefore, it is appropriate to correct his record to show his entitlement to these awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Bronze Star Medal, for his exemplary conduct in ground combat against an armed enemy while serving in the ETO from 20 October 1944 through 2 September...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073831C070403
The applicant requests, as the son of a deceased former service member (FSM), that his father’s military records be corrected to show award of the Presidential Unit Citation, the French Croix de Guerre, the Belgian Fourragere, the American Defense Service Medal, the American Campaign Medal, the European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal with five bronze service stars, the World War II Victory Medal, the Army of Occupation Medal, the French Jubilee of Liberty Medal, and the Good Conduct...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019003
In regard to the applicant's issue regarding eligibility of Army combat engineers, as a group, to receive combat-related badges and medals, such as the Bronze Star Medal, Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) sets forth procedures for processing requests for correction of military records. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the applicant the Army Commendation Medal...