Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103796C070208
Original file (2004103796C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:           11 January 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:   AR2004103796


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Rosa M. Chandler              |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Linda D. Simmons              |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. John T. Meixell               |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Carol A. Kornhoff             |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his bad conduct discharge (BCD)
be upgraded to that of a general discharge (GD) under honorable conditions.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he believes his punishment was
too harsh. A couple of minor offenses should not warrant a BCD.  Overall,
his performance and conduct were good.

3.  The applicant provides in support of his request an Army Achievement
Medal, dated 25 September 1986; a Certificate for completion of the "Old
Guard" Ceremonial Training Program, dated 2 November 1984; a Certificate
for completion of the Obstacle Building, Explosives Handling, and
Demolitions Course, from 21-28 July 1986; a Diploma for completion of the
11B Course; and a Certificate from the Armed Forces Inaugural Committee in
recognition of his support and services, dated 1985.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 13 March 1984, the applicant enlisted in the Delayed Entry Program
(DEP).  On 20 June 1984, he was discharged from the DEP and he enlisted in
the Regular Army for 4 years, training in military occupational specialty
(MOS) 11B, Infantryman, an Army Cash Bonus in the amount of $8,000 and for
the Army College Fund Program.  Following completion of all required
military training, he was awarded MOS 11B, Infantryman.

2.  On 28 August 1984, while assigned to Fort Benning, Georgia for One
Station Unit Training, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of
Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), was imposed against
the applicant for disobeying a lawful order from a commissioned officer.
His punishment included 14 days of extra duty and restriction and a
forfeiture of $133.00 pay per month for 1 month.

3.  The applicant served in Korea without any recorded incidents between
15 February 1985 to 2 December 1986.  On 27 January 1987, he was assigned
to Fort Campbell, Kentucky.

4.  On 19 May 1987, NJP under the provisions of Article 15, UCMJ, was
imposed against him for failure to go to his appointed place of duty on 19
March 1987.  His punishment included reduction from pay grade E-4 to pay
grade E-3, 14 days of extra duty and a forfeiture of $196.00 pay for 1
month.

5.  On 23 June 1987, the applicant was convicted pursuant to his pleas by a
special court-martial of being absent without leave (AWOL) from his unit
from
25 March to 1 April 1987 and from 6 April to 6 May 1987, and of wrongful
use of marijuana between 4 January and 4 February 1987.  He was sentenced
to reduction from pay grade E-3 to pay grade E-1, confinement at hard labor
for 75 days, and to be separated with a BCD.

6.  On 15 July 1987, the applicant was placed on excess leave pending
completion of the appellate review process.  On 6 August 1987, the sentence
was approved.

7.  On 2 March 1988, the findings were affirmed and the sentence was
approved. The appropriate authority ordered the BCD to be duly executed.

8.  The applicant's DD Form 214 Certificate of Release or Discharge from
Active Duty) shows that on 20 May 1988, he was discharged in absentia under
the provisions of chapter 3, Army Regulation 635-200, with a BCD as a
result of conviction by a special court-martial.  He completed 3 years, 8
months, and 18 days of active military service.  He also had in excess of
100 days of lost time due to being AWOL and in military confinement.

9.  On 6 February 2002, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied the
applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge under that board's 15-
year statute of limitations.

10.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the
separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 3, paragraph 3-11, provides that
a soldier will be given a BCD pursuant only to an approved sentence of a
general or special court-martial.  The appellate review must be completed
and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed.

11.  Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal
through the judicial process.  In accordance with Title 10, United States
Code, Section
1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is empowered to
change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process
only if clemency is determined to be appropriate.  Clemency is an act of
mercy, or instance of leniency, to moderate the severity of the punishment
imposed.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses
charged.  Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with
applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately
characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.

2.  The applicant's training and military awards were noted, however, they
were not sufficiently mitigating to warrant clemency in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__lds___  __jtm___  __cak___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.




                 Linda D. Simmons
            ______________________
                    CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2004103796                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20050111                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(BCD)                                   |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |19880520                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR635-200, Chap 3                       |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |(DENY)                                  |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |144.6000                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |



-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101381C070208

    Original file (2004101381C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, on 16 December 1986, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 3, as a result of a duly reviewed and affirmed special court-martial conviction. A review of the available records fails to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003744C070206

    Original file (20050003744C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD). The applicant states, in effect, that he knows that there is no error in his court-martial case. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014201

    Original file (20070014201.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 April 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070014201 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 13 November 1985, the applicant offered to plead guilty to the charge and all specifications, provided the convening authority would not approve a sentence in excess of a bad conduct discharge, confinement for 5...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106311C070208

    Original file (2004106311C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 August 1990, the United States Army Court of Military Review affirmed the findings and approved the sentence of the general court- martial. There is no evidence available to indicate the applicant ever petitioned the United States Court of Military Appeals for review of the decision of the Army Court of Military Review. The applicant was placed in pretrial confinement on 10 October 1989 and adjudged on 25 January 1990, a period of only 3 months and 15 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020353

    Original file (20100020353.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in a letter to the Veteran's Administration Board, during his time of service he had been considered a respectable and honorable Soldier by his fellow Soldiers as well as his higher authorities. When authorized, it was issued to a Soldier whose military record was satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. ____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013066

    Original file (20060013066.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his dishonorable discharge (DD). The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on the date of his separation, 12 June 1984, shows that he was separated with a DD under the provisions of paragraph 3-10, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of court-martial. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088520C070403

    Original file (2003088520C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant’s conviction and discharge with appropriate RE code were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations in effect at the time, and that his trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses with which he was charged. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002540C070206

    Original file (20050002540C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of her Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) to a General Discharge (GD) under honorable conditions. The applicant provides: a. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014310

    Original file (20080014310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows the applicant was convicted by a special-martial and he received a BCD. The applicant’s service was not sufficiently meritorious to warrant granting clemency.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011467txt

    Original file (20140011467txt.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The evidence of record shows he was convicted by a special court-martial that was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged at the time. His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations...