| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Vic Whitney | Analyst |
| Ms. Kathleen A. Newman | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Linda M. Barker | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to under honorable conditions.
2. The applicant states that it is his belief that an upgrade and change to his reenlistment (RE) code is automatic on application after 6 months.
3. The applicant provides no documents to support his request.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 November 1981 with over 5 years and 8 months prior active duty. He completed training as a food service specialist and was promoted to pay grade E-4 effective 1 September 1982.
2. The applicant was assigned to Germany on 21 June 1984 and was promoted to pay grade E-5 effective 1 October 1985. He was reduced to pay grade E-4 effective 2 December 1985 for misconduct.
3. On 20 May 1986, the applicant was convicted, pursuant to his pleas, by a General Court-Martial (GCM) for possession and distribution of marijuana and breaking restriction. The approved sentence included confinement for 18 months, reduction to the lowest enlisted grade, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and a BCD.
4. On 31 October 1986 the findings and sentence were affirmed. Effective 18 May 1987 the applicant was issued a BCD, in pay grade E-1, based on the result of a court-martial. His RE code is listed as RE-4. His separation document indicates he had 4 years, 6 months, and 4 days net active service this period and 5 years, 8 months, and 20 days total prior active service. The applicant had 365 days lost time due to confinement.
5. Army Regulation 15-180 provides for petitioning the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB), using DD Form 293, for upgrade of the characterization for discharge. The regulation specifies that the ADRB may not consider an appeal for an upgrade from an applicant discharged as a result of a GCM.
6. Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552 as amended does not permit any redress by the Army Board of Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) of the finality of a court-martial conviction and empowers the ABCMR to only change a discharge if clemency is determined to be appropriate.
7. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 3-7 provides that a discharge under honorable conditions is a separation for satisfactory service. The under honorable conditions characterization is appropriate when the reason for separation allows such characterization.
8. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the US Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of Armed Forces RE codes, including RA RE codes. RE-4 indicates that the applicant was disqualified from further service.
9. The U. S. Army does not have, nor has it ever had, a policy to automatically upgrade discharges. Each case is decided on its own merits when an applicant requests a change in discharge. Changes may be warranted if the Board determines that the characterization of service or the reason for discharge or both were improper or inequitable.
10. If the applicant desires to pursue a pardon, pardon issues are handled by the Office of the Pardon Attorney, Department of Justice. He should contact the Pardon Attorney at the following address: Office of the Pardon Attorney, 4th Floor, 500 First Street, NW, Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530-0001 for further information.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant’s conviction and discharge with appropriate RE code were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations in effect at the time, and that his trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses with which he was charged.
2. Any redress by this Board of the finality of a court-martial conviction is prohibited by law. The Board is only empowered to change a discharge if clemency is determined to be appropriate to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.
3. The applicant does not warrant an upgrade and he does not provide a sufficient reason for granting the relief he now requests. It would not be appropriate to change the records to show that he was discharged under honorable conditions on 18 May 1987 or entitled to a change in his RE code.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__kn___ ___lb___ ___jm___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003088520 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | BCD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19870518 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, CH 3 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A68.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.02 |
| 2. | 100.03 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009092
A Joint Alternate Service Board composed of military personnel would establish a period of alternate service of not more than 24 months that the individuals would perform. Both the Joint Board and Presidential Board were authorized to award a Clemency Discharge with the performance of alternate service. He was discharged pursuant to the sentence of a general court-martial and was issued a bad conduct discharge after the sentence was affirmed.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011693
The applicant requests, in effect, that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In general, a pardon is granted on the basis of the petitioner's demonstrated good conduct for a substantial period of time after conviction and service of sentence.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002922C070208
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant’s record shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 11 February 1971. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016234
The applicant states, in effect, he received a Clemency Discharge in 1976; however, he is not sure if he submitted a request to upgrade his discharge. At the time of his discharge the applicant had completed 3 months and 26 days of net active service during the period of service under review. Service discharge review boards and correction boards are not empowered to change the Clemency Discharge, but may review the underlying circumstances of the discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001642
He departed the continental United States on 30 October 1952 and he arrived in Japan on 14 November 1952 and Korea on 16 July 1953. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The applicants record of service included two prior court-martial convictions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006698
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 3 February 1975, the applicant was honorably released from active duty upon the expiration of his term of service. There appears to have been no error or injustice in regard to the applicants summary court-martial process that would...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013492
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. Therefore, the applicant's record of service is insufficiently meritorious to warrant a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022077
Only so much of the sentence as provided for a BCD, confinement for 12 months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to the grade of private/E-1 was approved and, with the exception of the BCD, directed to be executed. On 27 January 1993, he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 3, section IV, with a BCD in accordance with the affirmed sentence. He completed 2 years, 5 months, and 16 days of total...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009141
The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general or an honorable discharge. Accordingly, on 24 February 1992, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 3 as a result of a duly reviewed and affirmed general court-martial conviction. Title 10, United Stated Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, provides, in pertinent part, that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007705
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 February 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060007705 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted. Therefore, the applicant's discharge...