Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010456C070208
Original file (20040010456C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:      15 November 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20040010456


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Stephanie Thompkins           |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Stanley Kelley                |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. John T. Meixell               |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Robert L. Duecaster           |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction to her record to show
that she completed 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay benefits.

2.  The applicant states that she was given 5 years and 10 months
constructive service credit (CSC) for her degree and professional
experience.  She would like that time acknowledged to bring her tenure to
more than the 20 years, enough to qualify for retirement and her pension.

3.  The applicant provides copies of her Appointment in the United States
Army Reserve (USAR) memorandums, her response from the Officer Procurement
Division, Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center, St.
Louis, Missouri, her Chronological Statement of Retirement Points, and her
reply from the Chief, Transition and Separations Branch, US Army Reserve
Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM), St. Louis, Missouri.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error that
occurred on 26 November 1997, the date of her reassignment to the Retired
Reserve.  The application submitted in this case is dated 30 September but
was not received for processing until 24 November 2004.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant's military records show that she was appointed in the
USAR, Army Nurse Corps, as a first lieutenant, effective 19 November 1979,
with 5 years and 10 months CSC, at age 38.   Her appointment memorandum
does not show she was appointed with a waiver of the age requirement.

4.  On 23 January 1980, the Officer Procurement Division, Reserve
Components Personnel and Administration Center, St. Louis, Missouri,
responded to the applicant's questions about her awarded CSC at the time of
appointment.

5.  She was promoted to captain effective 14 January 1981 and to major
effective 17 January 1988.
6.  She was reassigned from a troop program unit to the Individual Ready
Reserve effective 19 November 1994.  Her Chronological Statement of
Retirement Points, dated 19 December 1996, shows that she earned no
additional points after her retirement year ending 18 November 1994
(through 18 November 1996).

7.  Her statement also shows that as of her retirement year ending 18
November 1996, she had 15 qualifying years of service for retirement and 17
years, 1 months and 6 days total service.  She was not issued, nor was she
eligible to have issued a notification of qualification for retired pay at
age 60 (20-Year Letter) prior to her separation.

8.  The Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Army Human Resources
Command – St. Louis, Missouri, verified that she was considered and not
selected for promotion to lieutenant colonel by the 1997 Army Medical
Department (AMEDD) Reserve Components Selection Board that convened on
7 October and recessed on 17 October 1997.

9.  She was reassigned to the Retired Reserve as a major effective 26
November 1997 after having completed 20 or more years of service.  At the
time of her reassignment to the Retired Reserve, she had completed 15
qualifying years of service for retirement.

10.  The Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Army Human Resources
Command – St. Louis, Missouri, also verified that she was considered and
not selected for promotion to lieutenant colonel by the 1998 RCSB AMEDD
convened on 5 June and recessed on 1 July 1998, after her discharge.

11.  She reached her 60th birthday on 2 June 2001.

12.  On 4 May 2004, the Chief, Transition and Separations Branch, US Army
Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM), St. Louis, Missouri, advised the
applicant an audit of her military record showed that she completed 15
qualifying years of service for retirement as shown on her chronological
record of military service.  Accordingly, she was ineligible to receive
retired pay.

13.  Army Regulation 135-101, prescribes the policies, procedures, and
eligibility criteria for appointment of commissioned officers in the
Reserve in the six branches of the AMEDD.  This regulation specifies that
CSC will be granted for periods of professional training and experience
accrued after receipt of the basic qualifying degree.  Entry grade credit
of 3 years or more, but less than 7 years,
provides the entry grade of first lieutenant.  Authorized credit in excess
of the minimum required for appointment to the appropriate grade will be
used to adjust the date of rank within the grade.

14.  Army Regulation 135-101, in pertinent part, also specifies that at the
time of appointment in the USAR and assignment to the ANC, with or without
active duty, officers appointed on or after their 33rd birthday will sign a
statement on waiver of age requirement:  "I understand that I may not be
able to complete 20 years of qualifying service for retirement purposes
under the provisions of Title 10, USC 1331 and 1332 prior to being removed
from an active status under applicable laws and regulations."

15.  Army Regulation 140-10, in effect at the time, set forth the basic
authority for the assignment, attachment, detail and transfer of USAR
Soldiers.  Chapter 7 of the regulation relates to the removal of Soldiers
from active status and states, in pertinent part, that Soldiers removed
from an active status will be discharged or, if qualified and if they so
request, will be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

16.  Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve-
Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), indicates, in
pertinent part, that to be eligible for retired pay, an individual does not
need to have a military status at the time of application for retired pay,
but must have (1) attained age 60; (2) completed a minimum of 20 years of
qualifying service; and, (3) served the last 8-years of his or her
qualifying service as a Reserve Component soldier.  The requirement to
serve the last 8 years in a Reserve Component has since been amended to the
last 6-years.

17.  Army Regulation 135-180 also specifies, in part, that to be eligible
for retired pay an individual must have attained age 60, and completed a
minimum of 20 years of qualifying service; and that subsequent to 1 July
1949, qualifying service is granted only for each year of service an
individual earns 50 or more retirement points.  It also specifies that
eligible members must make application for retired pay.

18.  The term “good years” is an unofficial term used to mean years in
which
50 or more retirement points are earned during each year, and which count
as qualifying years of service for retirement benefits at age 60.

19.  Public Law 92-425, the Survivor Benefit Plan, enacted 21 September
1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay
reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant had completed 15 years
of qualifying service for retirement purposes at the time of her
reassignment to the Retired Reserve.  A review of her records confirmed
that she had not completed a minimum of 20 qualifying years of service for
retired pay benefits at age 60.

2.  Notwithstanding the fact that she did not participate in the Reserve
and earn the additional points for "good years" of service, the reason for
her separation was erroneous.  It is clear that the USAR improperly
published orders transferring the applicant to the Retired Reserve.  She
had not completed the indicated 20 years qualifying service for retirement
purposes as shown on her reassignment orders.  There is also no evidence
the applicant voluntarily requested transfer to the Retired Reserve as
required by regulations.

3.  Through no fault of her own, the applicant was unable to reach normal
retirement eligibility.  Based on the foregoing, the applicant’s Department
of the Army records should be corrected by revoking the orders reassigning
her to the Retired Reserve on 26 November 1997, by showing she continued to
serve in the Individual Ready Reserve through 26 November 1999, and
completed 20 years of qualifying service for retirement purposes.  Through
no fault of her own, the applicant was unable to finish 20 years of
qualifying service to enable her to reach normal retirement eligibility.

4.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded CSC at the
time of her appointment entitling her to an entry grade of first
lieutenant.  There is also no evidence she was awarded a waiver of age
requirement at the time of her appointment.  There are no provisions for
including awarded CSC with years of service to equal 20 qualifying years of
service for retirement purposes.

5.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected
as recommended below.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

_SK_____  _JTM____  __RLD _  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.
As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records
of the individual concerned be corrected:

      a.  by revoking Orders C-11-748961, dated 26 November 1997,
reassigning her to the Retired Reserve;

      b.  by showing she continued to serve in the Individual Ready Reserve
from 26 November 1997 through 26 November 1999;

      c.  by crediting her with 35 inactive duty for retirement points only
and 15 memberships points for a total of 50 points for each year from
19 November 1994 through 18 November 1999, with no entitlement to back pay
and allowances;


      d.  by issuing a 20-Year letter and a corrected statement of her
retirement points; and


      e.  by showing she was reassigned from the Individual Ready Reserve in
the rank of major effective 26 November 1999 and transferred to the Retired
Reserve with entitlement to retired pay upon application with payment from
the approval date of the Board proceedings, and participation in the
Survivor Benefit Plan, if so elected.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is
insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result,
the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to
including her awarded CSC with years of service to equal 20 qualifying
years of service for entitlement to receive retired pay at age 60.




                                  ___   Stanley Kelley____
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040010456                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20051115                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |136.00                                  |
|2.                      |136.02                                  |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001140

    Original file (20070001140.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Non-Regular Service) implements statutory authorities governing the granting of "retired pay" to Soldiers and former Reserve Component Soldiers. The evidence of record further shows that the applicant was discharged from the USAR, effective 4 June 1997. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by revoking Headquarters, USAR Personnel Center, St. Louis,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010525C070208

    Original file (20040010525C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records show that he was appointed in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) from the Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC), Infantry (IN) Branch, as a second lieutenant effective 12 May 1969, with an educational delay to obtain a bachelor's degree. The applicant submits a copy of his MRD Computation Sheet that indicates his date of initial appointment as 12 May 1969; total break in service as 1 year, 2 months, and 18 days; authorized service time as 28 years; date...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016452

    Original file (20060016452.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This record shows, in pertinent part, that the applicant’s RY beginning date is 12 May, her RYE date is 11 May, and that she has 10 years of creditable service for retirement. In support of her application, the applicant provides a copy of Headquarters, Second Region (ROTC) U.S. Army Cadet Command, Orders 104-1-A-267, dated 14 April 1995 and DD Form 214, with an effective date of 1 February 2000, that show, in pertinent part, she entered active duty on 12 May 1995, her primary specialty was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002120C070206

    Original file (20050002120C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In an advisory opinion, dated 13 July 2005, the Chief, Promotions Branch, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Army Human Resources Command (AHRC) – St. Louis, Missouri, stated that based on the applicant's corrected date of rank for first lieutenant of 23 February 2000, her promotion eligibility date (PED) for captain was 22 February 2005. No captain AMEDD selection board prior to the 2004 board considered first lieutenants for promotion to captain with a date of rank later than 30...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003647

    Original file (20070003647.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that the MRD of 28 February 2007 and her age (i.e., 60) are being used as a pretense to remove her from the U.S. Army Reserve. This document shows, in pertinent part, that the applicant was notified she was considered by a Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board that convened on 10 May 2005 to consider officers of her grade for promotion, but she was not among those selected for promotion by the board. The evidence of record shows that at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003121C070206

    Original file (20050003121C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Carmen Duncan | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 21 November 1997, the applicant contacted Major R_______ and requested immediate transfer to the Individual Ready Reserve. She became a 2- time passover and was discharged from the Army Reserve on 19 November 1998 before her 8-year statutory obligation on 22 August 2002.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020760

    Original file (20090020760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her records as follows: * Award of 8 years and 11 months of constructive service credit (CSC) in order to establish her promotion eligibility to major (MAJ) as March 2001 * Adjustment of her date of rank (DOR) as a MAJ to an appropriate date to put her in the zone for promotion to lieutenant colonel * Correction of her education error * Informing the U.S. Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010331

    Original file (20070010331.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following additional documentary evidence in support of her application: a. DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 31 December 1992. b. U.S. Total Army Personnel Command (now known as HRC), St. Louis, Missouri, Memorandum, dated 31 December 1992, appointing her as a Reserve commissioned officer. e. Page 1 of Standard Form 93 (Report of Medical History), dated 26 October 2000. f. Headquarters, 75th Division (Training Support),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017421

    Original file (20080017421.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 3-6 of Army Regulation 135-91 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve - Service Obligations, Methods of Fulfillment, Participation Requirements, and Enforcement Procedures) provides that an ARNG or USAR officer (other than a commissioned warrant officer) who has accrued 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay is required to attain 50 points annually to be retained in an active status in the Selected Reserve, IRR, or Standby Reserve (Active List). This regulation also states...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050010894C070206

    Original file (20050010894C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that she be issued a 20-year letter and that she be transferred to the Retired Reserve. The applicant states that she maintained an active status in the Alabama Army National Guard (ALARNG) from 4 April 1979 until August 1997, when she transferred to a United States Army Reserve (USAR) unit. The evidence in this case suggests that the applicant was discharged because she had reached the expiration of her term of service (ETS) and had not taken steps to reenlist.