Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050010894C070206
Original file (20050010894C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:            27 APRIL 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:   AR20050010894


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Jessie B. Strickland          |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Lester Echols                 |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. John Meixell                  |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Naomi Henderson               |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that she be issued a 20-year letter and that she
be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

2.  The applicant states that she maintained an active status in the
Alabama Army National Guard (ALARNG) from 4 April 1979 until August 1997,
when she transferred to a United States Army Reserve (USAR) unit.  She
remained in the USAR unit until March 1999, when she was transferred to the
USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) due to unsatisfactory participation.
She remained in the control group until she was discharged in August 2001.
She goes on to state that she began experiencing health problems in
February 1999, when she was diagnosed with breast cancer and those medical
problems contributed to her unsatisfactory participation.  She also states
that she was not counseled regarding her options and was not provided
transition assistance.  She further states that she began inquiring about
her 20-year retirement eligibility in March 2000

3.  The applicant provides a letter explaining her position on the matter
with a listing of 12 enclosures.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged injustice which
occurred on 21 August 2001.  The application submitted in this case is
dated 15 July 2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  She enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 November 1976 and served on
active duty until she was honorably discharged on 17 February 1978.  On 5
April 1979, she enlisted in the ALARNG and continued to serve until she was
honorably discharged in the pay grade of E-5 on 21 August 1997, for the
purpose of enlisting in the USAR.

4.  On 22 August 1997, she enlisted in the USAR for a period of 4 years,
which established her expiration of term of service (ETS) as 21 August
2001.

5.  On 18 March 1999, she was reassigned from her troop program unit (TPU)
to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) due to unsatisfactory
participation.

6.  On 21 August 2001, she was honorably discharged from the USAR on her
ETS.

7.  A review of the available records fails to show that she was ever
issued a   20-year letter or that she completed 20 creditable years to
qualify for retirement at age 60.

8.  A retirement points history statement provided by the applicant shows
that on 4 October 2002, her ALARNG points totaled 19 years of creditable
service for Retired Pay purposes.  A more recent chronological statement of
retirement points shows that she has 19 years, 7 months and 16 days of
creditable service for retirement purposes.

9.  A chronological statement of retirement points which shows her USAR
service indicates that she had only 1 creditable year of service in the
USAR for the Retirement Year Ending (RYE) on 4 April 1998.  It also shows
that she was three points short of having a creditable year in the RYE 4
April 1997.

10.  On 30 November 2000, the applicant contacted officials at the Army
Reserve Personnel Center in St. Louis, Missouri, to obtain a 20-year letter
and was informed at that time that there was no record of her having
qualifying years of service.  She was provided an address to send the
documents required to update her records.  On 6 February 2001 she was sent
a reenlistment card.  There is no indication that she responded to the
issue of reenlistment and there is no evidence to show that she was barred
from reenlistment.

11.  A review of the documents provided by the applicant indicates that she
began treatments for cancer in March 1999.

12.  Army Regulation 135-180, Qualifying Service for Retired Pay -
Nonregular Service, provides, in pertinent part, that a USAR Soldier who
completes 20 qualifying years of service is eligible to apply for Retired
Pay at age 60, provided that the last 8 years were served in the Reserve
Components.  A qualifying year of service is one in which the Soldier earns
at least 50 points during the established retirement year.  Any points less
than 50 do not qualify as a qualifying year for retirement purposes.  A
Soldier must have 20 years of service in which he or she earned 50 or more
points each retirement year in order to be issued a 20-year letter.

13.  Title 10, United States Code, Section 1176b provides a sanctuary
provision for Reserve enlisted members who are credited with at least 18
but less than 20 years of service completed under section 1332 of the Code
and are selected to be involuntarily separated or whose term of enlistment
expires and who are denied reenlistment.

14.  Army Regulation 135-178, Enlisted Administrative Separations,
provides, in pertinent part, that a Soldier is entitled to be discharged on
the expiration of their service obligation and normally will be discharged
unless action is taken to retain the Soldier beyond such expiration date.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence in this case suggests that the applicant was discharged
because she had reached the expiration of her term of service (ETS) and had
not taken steps to reenlist.  Accordingly, since reenlistment is a
volitional act and she was not barred from reenlistment, the Department was
obligated to discharge her on her ETS.

2.  At the time the applicant was discharged she had only completed 19
years, 7 months and 16 days of creditable service for retired pay purposes
and thus was not issued a 20-year letter.

3.  Therefore, it was incumbent on the applicant to take the steps
necessary to either obtain the additional service necessary to qualify for
retirement at age 60 or to provide documentation to show that she in fact
had service that was not properly documented in her records.

4.  However, given the seriousness of the applicant’s condition at the
time, it is reasonable to presume that the applicant’s concerns were
focused on her medical condition at the time instead of her military
service obligations and that checking her records was not one of her
priorities.

5.  Accordingly, it would be in the interest of compassion to grant the
applicant an exception to policy by transferring three retirement points
from the RYE 4 April 1998 to the RYE 4 April 1997, so as to give her a
creditable year of service for that year and to qualify her for issuance of
a 20-year letter and non-regular retirement at age 60.


BOARD VOTE:

___LE  __  ___JM __  ___NH __  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by
voiding her discharge of 21 August 2001, by transferring three retirement
points from the RYE 4 April 1998 to the RYE 4 April 1997, by issuing her a
20-year letter and by transferring her to the Retired Reserve effective 21
August 2001.



                                  ______Lester Echols________
                                            CHAIRPERSON

                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050010894                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20060427                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |HD                                      |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |20010821                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR 135-180                              |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |Retirement-Nonregular Service           |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT-FULL RELIEF                       |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |AR 15-185                               |
|ISSUES                  |341/usar ret res                        |
|1.136.0300              |                                        |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100006960

    Original file (20100006960.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 28 October 2009, by letter to his Member of Congress, HRC-STL stated that to be eligible for retired pay at age 60 by law, a Reserve Component (RC) Soldier must have completed a minimum of 20 qualifying years of service and that as of 1 July 1949, the last 8 qualifying years must be in an RC. Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), paragraph 2-1a, states that to be eligible for retired pay an individual does...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013778

    Original file (20080013778.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay, Nonregular Service), in effect at the time of the applicant's separation, states: a. a qualifying year for the purposes of qualifying for nonregular service retired pay is determined to be any year in which a service member earns a minimum of 50 retirement points; b. to be eligible for retired pay, an individual need not have a military status at the time of application, but must have: (1) attained age 60, (2) completed a minimum...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025229

    Original file (20110025229.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), paragraph 2-1a, states that to be eligible for retired pay an individual does not need to have a military status at the time of application for retired pay, but must have: (1) attained age 60, (2) completed a minimum of 20 years of qualifying service, and (3) served the last 8 years of his or her qualifying service as an RC Soldier. After 30 June 1949, a reservist must earn...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011643

    Original file (20070011643.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that she would like a 15-year retirement letter because she is not able to actively participate in a unit of the United States Army Reserve (USAR) due to her medical condition. The applicant's military personnel records show she successfully completed 14 years of qualifying service in the USAR and ARNG from her initial enlistment on 10 July 1976 to her honorable discharge on 20 November 2000. Based on the provisions of law in effect at the time the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086187C070212

    Original file (2003086187C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be credited with 20 qualifying years of service for a nonregular retirement and issued a notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (a 20-year letter). He enlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 15 June 1977. The term “good years” is an unofficial term used to mean years in which 50 or more retirement points are earned during each year and which count as qualifying years of service for retirement benefits at age 60.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016521

    Original file (20130016521.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time of his discharge, he had over 21 years of service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and the Regular Army (RA). Paragraph 2-1 states to be eligible for retired pay, an individual need not have a military status at the time of application, but must have attained age 60, completed a minimum of 20 years of qualifying service, and at that time, served the last 6 of his qualifying years as a Reserve Component Soldier. The evidence of record further shows that although there appears to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010372

    Original file (20110010372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's contentions that his retired grade should be colonel/O-6 instead of lieutenant colonel/O-5 and that he was unaware he had been transferred to the Retired Reserve until March 2010 were carefully considered and determined to lack merit. Additionally, there is no substantive evidence showing he was referred to a medical evaluation board at the time of his transfer to the Retired Reserve. His major surgery was not performed until 2 years after his transfer to the Retired...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050012803C070206

    Original file (20050012803C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant voluntarily requested transfer to the Retired Reserve, the request was approved and the applicant was discharged from the ALARNG and transferred to the Retired Reserve on 4 April 2005. The previous ABCMR found the ASB improper and the Secretarial Authority approved the recommendation to redo the ASB. Given the Board's prior decision, the subsequent ASB, and the TAG's action, he should be made whole by granting an antedated reenlistment contract if appropriate; restoring any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104616C070208

    Original file (2004104616C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The term “good years” is an unofficial term used to mean years in which 50 or more retirement points are earned during each year and which count as qualifying years of service for retirement benefits at age 60. From the available evidence of record, it appears the applicant should have been discharged on 1 September 1964 upon his ETS. The available evidence of record shows the applicant requested transfer to the Retired Reserve but he never retired.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060869C070421

    Original file (2001060869C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his last year in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) be corrected to reflect a “good” year. The applicant was informed correctly – he did have a “good” year for retirement as retirement year ending date (RYE) 12 July 1999.