Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04101879C070208
Original file (04101879C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        02 SEPTEMBER 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR2004101879


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Deborah L. Brantley           |     |Senior Analyst       |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Walter Morrison               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. William Powers                |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Ronald Weaver                 |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and that his records
be corrected to show that he was retired by reason of physical disability
with a 100 percent Army disability rating.

2.  The applicant states, in his self-authored statement, that he was
installing telephone cable while in Vietnam and that they were unable to
use their trucks in the area because the "stock yard was so wet."  As a
result his feet slipped and he damaged his back.  He states that he went to
the doctor at the time and was given medication but has had to live with
the pain.

3.  The applicant maintains that he should have received a Purple Heart and
been medically retired when he left Vietnam.

4.  The applicant provides no evidence in support of his request beyond his
self-authored statement.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
which occurred on 31 July 1968.  The application submitted in this case is
dated
13 December 2003.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  Records available to the Board indicate that the applicant was inducted
and entered active duty on 27 September 1966.  He was trained as a lineman.

4.  In August 1967 he was assigned to Vietnam as a lineman with the 580th
Signal Company.  In December 1967 he was reassigned to the 69th Signal
Company and in May 1968 was promoted to pay grade E-5.

5.  The applicant departed Vietnam in July 1968 and on 31 July 1968 was
released from active duty under a program which permitted the early
separation of overseas returnee.
6.  There were no service medical records available to the Board or
provided by the applicant.  Item 40 (wounds) on his Department of the Army
Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) is blank.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple
Heart is awarded for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action.
Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the
result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a
medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of
official record.  Wounds sustained as the result of an accident, even
though they may have occurred within a combat zone, do not meet the
requirements for award of the Purple Heart.

8.  Army Regulation 40-501 provides that for an individual to be found
unfit by reason of physical disability, he must be unable to perform the
duties of his office, grade, rank or rating.  That same regulation also
provides that performance of duty despite an impairment is evidence of
physical fitness.

9.  A review of Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and
Campaign Participation Credit Register) notes the applicant participated in
four designated campaign periods (Vietnam Counteroffensive Phases III, IV,
and V and the TET Counteroffensive).  His campaign participation should be
reflected by four bronze service stars on the Vietnam Service Medal
currently reflected on his separation document.  The applicant is also
entitled to two Meritorious Unit Commendations awarded during his service
with the 580th Signal Company, and a Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross
Unit Citation with Palm.  The unit awards were also omitted from his
separation document.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no medical evidence which confirms that the applicant was
wounded as a result of hostile action while in Vietnam or that he had any
medical conditions which rendered him unfit for continued military service.
 In the absence of such evidence, there is no basis for an award of the
Purple Heart or to correct his records to show that he was retired by
reason of physical disability with a disability rating of 100 percent.

2.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in
error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would
satisfy that requirement.

3.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 31 July 1968; therefore, the time for
the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice
expired on
30 July 1971.  However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year
statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or
evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
failure to file in this case.

4.  Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative
error which does not require action by the Board.  Therefore,
administrative correction of the applicant's records will be accomplished
by the Case Management Support Division (CMSD), St. Louis, Missouri, as
outlined by the Board in paragraph 3 of the BOARD
DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION section below.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___WM__  ___WP__  ___RW__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.





3.  The Board determined that administrative error in the records of the
individual should be corrected.  Therefore, the Board requests that the
CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual
concerned to show entitlement to four bronze service stars on his Vietnam
Service Medal, two awards of the Meritorious Unit Commendation, and a
Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm.


                                  ____Walter Morrison_______
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2004101879                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20040902                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |107.00                                  |
|2.                      |108.00                                  |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006128

    Original file (20080006128.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was awarded the Purple Heart during his service in Long Binh, Vietnam, in 1969. The applicant's records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 2 years on 6 August 1968. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), of the applicant’s DD Form 214, dated 13 August 1970, shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018978

    Original file (20140018978.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    General Orders Number 599, issued by Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division, on 9 February 1968, awarded him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 2 February 1968 while assigned to Company C, 124th Signal Battalion, in Vietnam. As a result, there is insufficient evidence to support removing the Purple Heart from his records. ______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014794

    Original file (20110014794.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This order shows he was awarded the Purple Heart (First Award) for wounds received in action on 18 February 1968. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his records to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (First Award) for the period 30 June 1967 through 8 April 1970; and b. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the: * Purple Heart * AGCM (First Award) *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011546C070208

    Original file (20040011546C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), issued at the time of his retirement, shows in Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, Bronze Star Medal, Good Conduct Medal (4 Awards), Republic of Vietnam Cross of Gallantry with Palm, and Expert Qualification Badge with Rifle...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010305C080213

    Original file (20070010305C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Stone Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The regulation stated that authority to award the Purple Heart was delegated to hospital commanders. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative errors which do not require action by the Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004457

    Original file (20090004457.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He was then reassigned to the 578th Signal Company (USARPAC, RVN) in duty MOS 36C2O from 7 July 1967 to 15 January 1968 and then served in duty MOS 76Y4O from 16 January to 20 February 1968. c. Item 40 (Wounds) is blank. There is no evidence in the applicant’s military personnel records that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action; his DA Form 20 does not list the Purple Heart in item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016370C070206

    Original file (20050016370C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records do not contain any general orders awarding him the Purple Heart. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned as follows: a. by showing he is entitled to the National Defense Service Medal; b. by showing he is entitled to the Vietnam Service Medal; and c. by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007828C070205

    Original file (20060007828C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that the Purple Heart is not listed on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative errors which do not require action by the Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019185

    Original file (20080019185.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he received a shrapnel wound to his right temple near his eyebrow during his service in the Republic of Vietnam and should be entitled to award of the Purple Heart. There are no general orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. In the applicant’s case, there are no general orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart; there is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows his wound was a result of hostile action;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012675

    Original file (20060012675.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are also no orders in his military records which awarded him the Purple Heart. However, his military records do not show that he was awarded the Good Conduct Medal for this period of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Good Conduct Medal for the period 22 January 1968 to 21 January 1971 while serving as a sergeant; b. awarding him the Meritorious Unit Commendation and the...