Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014794
Original file (20110014794.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  31 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110014794 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of two Purple Hearts.   

2.  He states he missed two weeks of basic combat training due to a back injury, and while serving in Vietnam he was wounded in combat; however, it was deemed to be an accident.  He contends his Congressman said he should have received two awards of the Purple Heart. 

3.  He did not provide any additional documentation.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  His records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 June 1967.  After completion of training, he served in military occupational specialty 36C (Lineman).  

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was assigned to the 578th Signal Company, 41st Signal Battalion from 22 December 1967 through 
9 December 1968.

4.  His record contains a copy of General Orders Number 22, dated 21 February 1968.  This order shows he was awarded the Purple Heart (First Award) for wounds received in action on 18 February 1968. 

5.  His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows he was honorably released from active duty on 8 April 1970 and was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement).  He had completed 2 years, 9 months, and 9 days of total active service.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of this form shows he was awarded the:

* National Defense Service Medal 
* Vietnam Service Medal with one silver service star
* Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar

6.  His name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty roster. 

7.  His record is void of documentation showing he was recommended for or awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).  Item 38 of his DA Form 20 shows he received ratings of “excellent” in conduct and efficiency throughout his career.  

8.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards and Decorations), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period was 3 years, except in those cases when the period for the first award ended with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.

9.  Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974, announced   award of the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U.S. Military Assistance Command and its subordinate units during the period 
8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973 and to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973.
10.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows the 578th Signal Company was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) for the period 1 October 1967 through
31 August 1968.

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  General orders awarded him the Purple Heart (First Award).  As a result, he is authorized to add this award to item 24 of his DD Form 214. 

2.  He contends his Congressman stated he should have received two Purple Hearts for his injuries.  Regulatory guidance states evidence must be provided to show that wounds received were the result of hostile action, the wounds required medical treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  

3.  His record is absent of evidence and he has not provided sufficient evidence to show he was wounded a second time as a result of hostile action.  Injuries received during basic combat training do not meet the criteria for award of the Purple Heart.  As such, he is not entitled to a second award of the Purple Heart. 

4.  The evidence of record confirms he served honorably during the period 
30 June 1967 through 8 April 1970.  He received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service.  Based on his overall record of service, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM and to correct his records to reflect this award.

5.  During his tour of duty in Vietnam, the 578th Signal Company was awarded the MUC and the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his records to show these unit awards.





BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X____  ___X ___  ___X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  awarding him the AGCM (First Award) for the period 30 June 1967 through 8 April 1970; and
   
   b.  adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the:

* Purple Heart
* AGCM (First Award)
* MUC
* RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to awarding him a second Purple Heart.  




      __________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.




ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014794





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014794



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004457

    Original file (20090004457.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He was then reassigned to the 578th Signal Company (USARPAC, RVN) in duty MOS 36C2O from 7 July 1967 to 15 January 1968 and then served in duty MOS 76Y4O from 16 January to 20 February 1968. c. Item 40 (Wounds) is blank. There is no evidence in the applicant’s military personnel records that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action; his DA Form 20 does not list the Purple Heart in item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003237

    Original file (20120003237.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests to add the following awards to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge): * Purple Heart (2nd Award) * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) (2nd Award) * Air Medal (AM) 2. General orders awarded the applicant two Purple Hearts; however, orders show they both were awarded for wounds received on 16 September 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017501

    Original file (20070017501.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no general orders in the applicant’s record to show he was awarded the Purple Heart. Evidence of record shows that the applicant participated in 3 campaigns during his service in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding the already-awarded ARCOM to his DD Form 214; b. awarding the applicant the AGCM (First Award) for the qualifying period of 17 October 1966 – 16 October 1969 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019581

    Original file (20130019581.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show award of the Purple Heart. His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the: * National Defense Service Medal * ARCOM * Air Medal * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * Combat Infantryman Badge * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Parachutist Badge 11. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019742

    Original file (20100019742.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His request to be issued a DD Form 215 to show award of the PH, ARCOM, AFEM, AMs (two awards), and all other awards he is entitled to receive was carefully considered. He requested award of the AFEM; however, he did not serve in Vietnam during a period the AFEM was authorized for award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the PH for wounds received on 23 October 1967, and the AGCM (First...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019414

    Original file (20140019414.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His unit in Vietnam was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation during his period of assignment in Vietnam. The applicant served in Vietnam during a qualifying period; therefore, his DD Form 24 should be corrected to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 23 August 1966 through 29 June 1969 and b. adding the following...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015169

    Original file (20110015169.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the following awards: * Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) * Purple Heart with one Oak Leaf Cluster * Air Medal (AM) with "V" Device and Numeral 7 * Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with one silver and two bronze service stars * Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) * RVN...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005231

    Original file (20090005231.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 2-10 of the awards regulation contains guidance on the NDSM and states, in pertinent part, that it is authorized for honorable active service for any period between 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974. Therefore, it would be appropriate to accept the date provided by the applicant as the most accurate date, and to award him the PH for wounds received as a result of hostile action in the RVN in June 1967; and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014381C071029

    Original file (20060014381C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any documents or orders showing that he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a direct result of, or was caused by enemy action, that the wound was treated by military medical personnel, and a record of this medical treatment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030534

    Original file (20100030534.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he should be awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the VSM; b. awarding him the AGCM (First Award) for the period 29 August 1966 through 28 August 1969;...