RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 10 AUGUST 2004
DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004101037
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | |Senior Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Ms. Gail Wire | |Chairperson |
| |Ms. Karen Heinz | |Member |
| |Mr. Paul Smith | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his RE (Reentry) Code be corrected.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that he believes that his RE-3 is
incorrect. He notes that he was promoted to pay grade E-4 with a waiver
because he exceeded expectations during a military training course and that
he had been awarded an Army Achievement Medal.
3. He states that the “error” was discovered during an application process
for the “Commissioning Board to the United States Army Reserve.” He states
that he is a first lieutenant in the Army Reserve and is currently seeking
active duty opportunities and maintains that the RE code “greatly hampers
this process due to investigative processes that ensue.”
4. The applicant provides no evidence in support of his request.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
which occurred on 7 August 1988. The application submitted in this case is
dated
13 November 2003.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. Records available to the Board indicate that the applicant enlisted in
the Regular Army for a period of 2 years on 28 October 1986. He was
trained as a medical specialist and assigned to Fort Stewart, Georgia, in
April 1987 following completion of training. He was promoted to pay grade
E-4 in April 1988 after receiving a waiver for the time in service
requirement. He did receive an Army Achievement Medal for meritorious
service in 1987.
4. On 24 June 1988 the applicant submitted a request to be released from
active duty prior to his scheduled separation date in order to attend
school. His request was approved and on 7 August 1988 he was released from
active duty with an honorable characterization of service.
5. His separation document notes that the authority for his separation was
Chapter 5, Section II, of Army Regulation 635-200, and that the reason for
his separation “Directed by Service Secretary.” He received an RE Code of
“3” and an SPD (Separation Code) of “MFF.”
6. Army Regulation 635-200, then in effect, provided for the
administrative separation of enlisted Soldiers. Chapter 5 pertained to the
separation of Soldiers for the “Convenience of the Government” and Section
II addressed separation based on Secretarial authority. It stated that the
separation of Soldiers for the convenience of the Government is the
prerogative of the Secretary of the Army. The separation of any Soldier of
the Army under this authority will be based on the Secretary of the Army’s
determination that separation is in the best interest of the Army.
7. Army Regulation 635-3-1, then in effect, prescribed the SPD codes to be
used based on the authority under which an individual was released or
discharged from active duty. It notes that SPD code “MFF” applied to
individuals separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200,
Chapter 5, Section II, at the direction of the Service Secretary. A “cross-
reference” chart, provided by officials from the separations branch at the
United States Army Human Resources Command-Alexandria, notes that RE-3 or
RE-2 was the appropriate RE code for individuals who receive an SPD code of
“MFF.” It further noted that individuals separated for the convenience of
the Government who did not have a Department of the Army or local bar to
reenlistment, and who were not being separated because of medical,
misconduct, or other derogatory reasons, would receive and RE-2.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence confirms that the applicant was voluntarily released from
active duty for the convenience of the Government in order to attend
school. The discharge was not based on any medical, misconduct, or other
derogatory reasons and the applicant did not have a bar to reenlistment in
place at the time of his release from active duty. As such, the applicant
should have received an RE-2 vice the RE-3. His records should be
corrected accordingly.
BOARD VOTE:
__GW___ __ KH ___PS __ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a
result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the
individual concerned be corrected by replacing his RE-3 with an RE-2.
_____ Gail Wire_______
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR2004101037 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON |YYYYMMDD |
|DATE BOARDED |20040810 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |YYYYMMDD |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR . . . . . |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |GRANT |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. |110.00 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008651
The reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty and their corresponding SPD codes will be entered on the Soldiers' DD Forms 214. The separation authority determined that RE 2 was the applicable RE code after reviewing the applicant's record. An RE 2 code does provide for the enlistment or reenlistment of these prior service Soldiers because RE 2 means a Soldier is fully qualified for enlistment upon their separation from active duty.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080020033
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). PERSCOM directed that the applicant be assigned an RE-3 Code. _______ _ X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014973C070206
The applicant requests that his records be corrected by changing his reentry (RE) code. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the service at the time and may process enlistment waivers for the applicant’s RE code.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000392
The applicant requests that item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued on 14 June 2005 be changed to Hardship instead of Secretarial Authority. Evidence of record shows the applicant applied to the ADRB for a narrative reason for separation change to hardship/dependency and he provided substantive evidence to support his request. Since the evidence of record shows that he should have been discharged due to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000927C070206
Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000927C070206
The applicant’s complete military record is not available and does not contain his discharge processing documents. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074129C070403
The applicant requests that his separation (SPD) code on his 8 May 1993 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from “LBK” to “MBK.” That office recommended that the applicant be granted relief, and stated that the separation code, “MBK,” should have been entered on the applicant’s DD Form 214. There was no provision in the 1982 governing regulation for an SPD code of “MBK” for an enlisted soldier when the applicant was separated in May 1993; however,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017560
On 24 June 1998, after careful consideration and review of the applicant's military record and all other available evidence, the Army Discharge Review Board determined the applicant's discharge was proper and equitable and it voted to deny his request for an upgrade of his discharge to honorable and for a change to the narrative reason for his separation. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was discharged for misconduct based on his commission of serious offenses after his case...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9506342C070209
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: The applicant enlisted on 5 November 1984 for a period of 3 years. Although not explained in the available records, orders were published on 25 June 1991 which authorized the applicant to separate from the service prior to his ETS, on 28 November 1991, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, and considering that there were no early release programs announced at the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013504
Army Regulation 635-200 also states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty Soldiers will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. For Soldiers separated on or after 1 October 1988 this code reflects that separation was the result of an early release program and the Soldier was fully qualified to reenlist. The correct RE code is 2B.