Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080020033
Original file (20080020033.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  27 May 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080020033 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Reentry Eligibility (RE) Code be corrected from RE-3 to RE-1.

2.  The applicant states that he was released from active duty early with a college drop, some accrued leave, and a Secretarial drop.  When he was given his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he only looked at the characterization of service and did not realize that the RE-3 he was assigned would later impact his ability to reenlist.  He has now been turned away from the Marine Corps and Coast Guard because of his RE Code.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and personal identification documents.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 
has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 October 1992, was awarded the military occupational specialty of indirect fire infantryman, and was promoted to pay grade E-4.

3.  On 20 March 1995, the applicant requested early separation for the convenience of the Government.  In support of his request he attached a letter from a private company which showed that he had been offered a job with that company, but he would have to start the job by 1 April 1995.

4.  The applicant's request was approved by the U.S. Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM, now known as Human Resources Command – Alexandria).  PERSCOM directed that the authority for the separation be Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-3, that the narrative reason for separation be Secretarial Authority, that the Separation Program Designator (SPD) be "MFF," and that the RE Code be RE-3.

5.  Based on that approval, the applicant was honorably released from active duty on 5 May 1995 by reason of Secretarial Authority.  He was assigned an SPD of "MFF" and assigned an RE Code of RE-3.

6.  Army Regulation 601-210, table 3-6, lists the various RE codes and describes the reason(s) a soldier is assigned a particular code.  The code of RE-1 is assigned to individuals who complete an initial term of active service and who were fully qualified to reenlist when last separated.  The code of RE-3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable.  

7.  The SPD/RE Code Table, directs that the SPD "MFF" be assigned the RE code "TBD."  When the table specifies “TBD” (to be determined), the directive authorizing the separation program, or specific separation will provide the RE Code. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  PERSCOM directed that the applicant be assigned an RE-3 Code.  The SPD/RE Code Table states that the approval authority for a separation under Secretarial Authority will direct which RE Code to assign.  As such, the applicant's RE-3 Code is properly entered on his DD Form 214.

2.  While the applicant's desire to enlist is commendable, a presumption of regularity must be applied in this case, that what the Army did was correct.  The burden of proving otherwise rests with the applicant.

3.  The applicant is advised that although his RE-3 was properly assigned, this does not mean that he is totally disqualified from returning to military service.  The disqualification upon which the RE-3 codes were based may be waived for enlistment purposes.  The applicant is advised that if he desires to enlist, he should contact a local recruiter who can best advise him on his eligibility for returning to military service.  These individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the service at the time and may process enlistment waivers for the applicant’s RE code.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080020033





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080020033



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003640

    Original file (20090003640.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 July 2007, the ADRB granted the applicant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of his service to fully honorable and a change to the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority. A discharge under other than honorable conditions was normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter. The "JKK" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating under chapter 14-12(c) of AR 635-200 by reason of misconduct and the "JFF" SPD code is the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005832

    Original file (20090005832.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, his original DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 16 June 2003 with a characterization of service of under honorable conditions (general) under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 14-12c(2) after completing 6 years, 1 month, and 13 days of active military service with 303 days of lost time due to AWOL. On 9 May 2006, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) granted an upgrade of the applicant's characterization of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008651

    Original file (20100008651.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty and their corresponding SPD codes will be entered on the Soldiers' DD Forms 214. The separation authority determined that RE 2 was the applicable RE code after reviewing the applicant's record. An RE 2 code does provide for the enlistment or reenlistment of these prior service Soldiers because RE 2 means a Soldier is fully qualified for enlistment upon their separation from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007220

    Original file (20100007220.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities, the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD code to be used for these stated reasons. The regulation shows that the SPD of JKK as shown on the applicant's original DD Form 214 is appropriate for voluntary discharge when the narrative reason for discharge is Misconduct (Drug Abuse) and the authority for discharge is Army Regulation 635–200,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014973C070206

    Original file (20050014973C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected by changing his reentry (RE) code. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the service at the time and may process enlistment waivers for the applicant’s RE code.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004726

    Original file (20110004726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his Reentry (RE) code of 3 to a 1 so he may reenter military service. The regulation in effect at the time identified the SPD code of MCF as the appropriate code to assign RA Soldiers separated under the provisions of paragraph 5-17, Army Regulation 635-200, who were separated early to attend school. The SPD/RE Cross Reference Table in effect at the time of the applicant's separation established an RE code of 3 as the proper RE code to assign Soldiers...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075555C070403

    Original file (2002075555C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, Volume 7A, chapter 35 states that, among other reasons, service members separated at their own request or enlisted members...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001173

    Original file (20110001173.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states, in effect, his DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) shows honorable service from 25 February 1992 to 24 April 1997 and an immediate reenlistment [during this period] 25 April 1997 to 1 June 1998. The RE code on the applicant's DD Form 214 is correct. This being the case, the report is not evidence of error on a DD Form 214 or DD Form 215.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000927C070206

    Original file (20050000927C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000927C070206

    Original file (20050000927C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete military record is not available and does not contain his discharge processing documents. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.