Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04100206C070208
Original file (04100206C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:            23 SEPTEMBER 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER:   AR2004100206


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock             |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Raymond Wagner                |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Roger Able                    |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Eloise Prendergast            |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show his
correct retirement date and period of service, and that he receive all due
pay and allowances as a result of these corrections.

2.  The applicant states that the National Personnel Records Center does
not have all of his DD Forms 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge).  He is
not collecting retired pay for all of his service.  He was recalled to
active duty from the retired list [in February 1973] and reverted to a
retired status in July 1973.  He should have received retired pay based on
more than 24 years of service.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a 20 April 2004 statement from the
Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) indicating that the applicant
retired from the Air Force on 1 January 1972 with 23 years, 4 months, and 5
days of service; a copy of a 16 June 2003 DFAS letter providing the
applicant the same information regarding his years of service; a copy of
his letter to this agency in which he states that the DFAS information was
incorrect; a copy of amendments to orders indicating that his period of
active duty ended on 30 June 1973 and that he reverted to retired status on
1 July 1973; and copies of six  DD Forms 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's DD Forms 214 show seven periods of active federal
service, all with the Army, from 25 January 1949 to 6 June 1952 (3 years, 4
months,         12 days); 18 June 1952 to 17 June 1958 (6 years); 8 July
1958 to 7 July 1964      (6 years); 8 July 1964 to 7 July 1968 (4 years); 8
July 1968 to 31 October 1969 (1 year, 3 months, and 23 days), after which
he was transferred to the Retired Reserve with 20 years, 8 months, and 5
days of total active service.  On              1 November 1970 he was
recalled from the retired list and served on active duty  until his release
on 31 January 1973 and reversion to his retired status on           1
February 1973 (2 years and 3 months of active service, for a total of 22
years,  11 months and 5 days of total active service).  He was recalled to
active duty on 1 February 1973 and was released on 30 June 1973, reverting
to retired status on 1 July 1973 (5 months of active service, for a total
of 23 years, 4 months, and 5 days of active service).

2.  The applicant's 31 January 1973 DD Form 214, shows his total active
service as 22 years, 11 months, and 5 days, as indicated above; however,
that DD Form 214 also shows his other service, e.g., previous service, as
21 years, 8 months, and 5 days and a total service creditable for basic pay
purposes as 23 years,    11 months, and 5 days.  That 23 years, 11 months,
and 5 days was carried forward to his DD Form 214 of 30 June 1973, which
coupled with the 5 months that he served on active duty during the period
covered by that DD Form 214, indicates a total of 24 years, 4 months, and 5
days of creditable service for basic pay purposes.  As indicated above,
that DD Form 214, the last one that he received, does show 23 years, 4
months, and 5 days of active service.

3.  In response to his 8 April 2003 application to this Board, he was
informed on 18 December 2003 that his records showed that he had 23 years,
4 months, and 5 days of active military service; and that because there was
no indication that he had attempted to resolve the matter with DFAS, he had
not exhausted his administrative remedies, and his request was returned
with prejudice and without action being taken by the Board.

4.  The Defense Finance and Accounting Service has indicated that their
records show that the applicant retired on 31 January 1973 with 22 years,
11 months, and 5 days of service, that he was recalled to active duty on 1
February 1973 and served for 5 months until 30 June 1973, and that his
combined total of active duty service was 23 years, 4 months, and 5 days,
for which he was being paid.

5.  The applicant's records contain no evidence of service, active or
inactive, other than the service as indicated on his DD Forms 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's 31 January 1973 DD Form 214 is incorrect in that item
 22a(2) of that form shows 21 years, 8 months, and 5 days of other service.
 That entry should show 20 years, 8 months, and 5 days of other service.
Item 22a(3) of that form should show 22 years, 11 months, and 5 days of
total creditable service for basic pay purposes instead of 23 years, 11
months, and 5 days.

2.  The applicant's 30 June 1973 DD Form 214 is incorrect in that item
22a(2) of that form shows 23 years, 11 months, and 5 days of other service,
for a total of 24 years, 4 months, and 5 days of total creditable service
for basic pay purposes, instead of the correct number of years of other
service as 22 years, 11 months, and 5 days, and the correct total of 23
years, 4 months, and 5 days.

3.  The 16 June 2003 DFAS letter to him and the 20 April 2004 statement
concerning his years of service are both incorrect.  He did not retire on 1
January 1972 with 23 years, 4 months, and 5 days of service, but reverted
to his retired status on 1 July 1973 with that amount of service.  There is
no evidence that he served in the Air Force.

4.  The applicant served on active duty for 23 years, 4 months, and 5 days,
and he is receiving retired pay based on that period of service.  There is
no evidence and the applicant has not provided any, to reflect any
additional service.  There is no error in his records and no injustice done
to him.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___RW__  ___RA __  ___EP __  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.




            ___ Raymond Wagner____
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2004100206                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20040923                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |136.01.02                               |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04100573C070208

    Original file (04100573C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that his records should be corrected to show that he retired on 13 November 1970, vice 1 August 1966, with 26 years and 23 days of active federal service. The applicant served on active duty for 20 years, 4 months, and 25 days as indicated by his DD Form 214 of 31 July 1966, the date that he retired from the Army. His request to correct his records to show that he be paid for 26 years and 23 days of active federal service is not granted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010065

    Original file (20140010065.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DFAS official stated the law provided for a reduction or elimination of COLA during the 1st year of retirement and confirmed the applicant did not receive the benefit of any of the 2012 COLA increase that would have been effective 1 December 2011. e. The applicant offered that the law the DFAS official cited provided for a one-time reduction in COLA during the 1st year of eligibility for retirement pursuant to Title 10, USC, section 1401a, and that his eligibility for retired pay dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017814

    Original file (20140017814.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests payment of Aviator Continuation Pay (ACP) and Assignment Incentive Pay (AIP). He provided a memorandum from a Personnel Management Specialist in the HRC Incentive Pay Branch, dated 29 September 2014, subject: Support for Payment from FY12 ACP Program for ARSOA Agreement, dated 15 July 2012, for (Applicant), which states: a. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007224

    Original file (20130007224.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending on 31 December 2007, to show his pay entry basic date (PEBD) as 4 February 1969 and add the Legion of Merit. The DD Form 214 does not show the PEBD; it shows the date of entry on active duty during the period covered by the DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001804

    Original file (20150001804.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant signed the document verifying the accuracy of the information recorded on the DD Form 214. c. Based on the above and the available evidence of record, it is concluded that the DD Form 214 correctly shows the applicant's active duty service during this period (emphasis added) and rank/grade at the time he was released from active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012711

    Original file (20130012711.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he completed 13 years, 2 months, and 20 days of creditable military service for retired pay. His DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 April 1985 shows he was ordered to active duty during the period 21 September 1981 through 19 April 1985. The applicant was further advised that DFAS did not calculate his retired pay based on his retirement DD Form 214 but rather on his retirement order.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01925

    Original file (BC-2005-01925.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    When he was on active duty from July 2002 through February 2004, he tried to resolve a portion of his debt. He believes the countless hours spent to resolve his pay record problems show that no one knows if his pay record is correct. He respectfully requests the Board waiver the remaining $3517.76 and have DFAS return the money he’s been paying them in the time he’s tried to resolve this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008051

    Original file (20100008051.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 22a(1) properly shows the total amount of service completed between 28 June 1968 (inclusive date of current tour of duty) through 24 August 1973, a period of 5 years, 1 month, and 27 days. Item 22a(2) properly shows the total amount of service in the USAR DEP (2 June to 10 September 1967) and enlisted time from 11 September 1967 to 27 June 1968. The evidence of record he served in an enlisted status from 11 September 1967 through 27 June 1968.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013002

    Original file (20130013002.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show, in effect: * he was injured at Fort Dix, NJ and received medical treatment on 15 July 1989 * the separation date on his 1990 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect a date in 1991 * pay for active duty during November and December 1990 2. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show he was injured and received medical treatment on or about 15 July 1989, REFRAD in 1991,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015978

    Original file (20130015978.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    U.S. Army Military Personnel Center, Alexandria, VA, Orders S203-10, dated 20 October 1981, retired him from active duty effective 31 December 1981. This is the correct retirement date. His pay records from a monetary standpoint appear to be accurate in that they account for his 3 years and 2 months of active duty recall, but his retirement date is correct and there is no basis to change it.