| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Robert Duecaster | Member | |
| Ms. Marla J. Troup | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show that he was released from active duty (REFRAD) in the pay grade of E-6 (SSG) and by awarding him the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant states that he was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 prior to his REFRAD and he was wounded in Vietnam and was subsequently hospitalized in Vietnam and Japan; however, his records were never updated to reflect this information. He is attempting to obtain medical benefits through the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the award of the Purple Heart would change his priority group.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in Portland, Oregon, on 18 October 1966 for a period of 3 years and training as a field wireman. He completed his basic combat training at Fort Lewis, Washington, and his advanced individual training (AIT) at Fort Ord, California. Upon completion of his AIT he was transferred to Fort Sill, Oklahoma, to attend officer candidate school (OCS). He did not complete OCS and was transferred to Fort Carson, Colorado on 1 June 1967 in the rank of private first class (PFC). He remained at Fort Carson until he was transferred to Vietnam on 28 November 1967. He was assigned to Company D, 4th Battalion, 31ST Infantry Regiment.
5. On 4 January 1968, the applicant was wounded by shell fragments from a mortar round and was hospitalized for treatment. The clinical record contained in his records indicates that he was transferred from the 1st Marine Division Hospital to the 85th Evacuation Hospital in Vietnam to the 7th Field Hospital in Japan. It specifies that no Purple Heart was awarded at the hospital. He was classified as a battle injury incurred in the line of duty.
6. He was returned to his unit on 16 March 1968 and was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 20 April 1968 and to the pay grade of E-5 on 30 October 1968. He remained in Vietnam until 23 November 1968, when he was transferred to Fort Ord.
7. Although his records do not contain promotion orders, his records contain documents which show that he was serving in the pay grade of E-5 in September 1969 and in October 1969, he was serving in the pay grade of E-6 and he cleared the installation in the pay grade of E-6.
8. On 17 October 1969, he was honorably REFRAD in the pay grade of E-5, with a date of rank of 30 October 1968. He had served 3 years of total active service and was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the Good Conduct Medal. He was transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Standby) until he was honorably discharged in the pay grade of E-6 on 17 October 1972.
9. A review of his records also shows that he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) for meritorious service in Vietnam during the period of November 1967 to November 1968. However, that award was never reflected on his records.
10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound/injury sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was a result of hostile action, that the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.
11. Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation and the Valorous Unit Award (VUA) for service in Vietnam during the period the applicant was assigned. It also shows that he participated in five campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam and is entitled to be awarded one silver service star for wear on his already awarded VSM.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contention that he was wounded in combat in Vietnam and was treated for those wounds, is clearly supported by the evidence of record. It appears that an administrative oversight resulted in his not being awarded the Purple Heart for which he was and still is entitled to receive.
2. Accordingly, the Board finds that it would be in the interest of justice to award him the Purple Heart for wounds received in Vietnam on 4 January 1968, while serving in the rank of PFC.
3. Although there are no orders in the available records, there is sufficient evidence to show that in October 1969, he was in fact serving in the pay grade of E-6. Therefore, it must be presumed that his orders did not make it to his records before he was REFRAD. Accordingly, the Board finds that his records should be corrected to show that he was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 on 1 October 1969 and that he was REFRAD in that rank.
4. The Board also notes that he was awarded the ARCOM, which was never entered on his records. Therefore it would be appropriate to do so at this time.
5. Additionally, he was entitled to be awarded the RVNGC w/palm Unit Citation and the VUA. Therefore, they should also be awarded at this time.
6. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:
a. by awarding the individual concerned the Purple Heart for wounds received in action against the enemy in Vietnam on 4 January 1968, while serving in the rank of PFC.
b. by awarding him the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation and the VUA; and
c. by showing that he was awarded the ARCOM and was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 on 1 October 1969.
BOARD VOTE:
___rjw __ ___mt___ ___rld___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___Raymond J. Wagner___
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2003085165 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/08/26 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 61 | 107.0015/PH |
| 2. 79 | 107.0033/VUA |
| 3. 140 | 107.0094/RVNGC |
| 4. 189 | 110.0000/CORR 214 |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012096
The applicant states that he lost his right arm and left leg on a fire base in Vietnam in 1969 and was retired with 100% disability; however, he was never awarded the Purple Heart. That regulation also provides that the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM) with Device (1960) is awarded for service in Vietnam for a period of less than 6 months when an individual has been wounded by hostile forces, captured, or killed in the line of duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000402C070205
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 August 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060000402 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. John Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050015083C070206
Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 18 August 1969; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 17 August 1972. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003662C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to reflect his award of the Purple Heart and Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with “V” Device and that he be awarded the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL). After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 4 October 1966 through 3 October 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003376C070206
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his awards of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and Purple Heart. This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the RVNCM and by showing that he was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072407C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. There is sufficient evidence to show that the applicant was wounded on 31 October 1969, while serving as an infantryman in Vietnam, that he was treated by medical personnel and that he was awarded the Purple Heart for his wounds. The evidence of record also shows that he was awarded the ARCOM with “V” device...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083341C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant has provided sufficient evidence to show that he is entitled to an award of the Purple Heart for wounds/injuries received in Vietnam on 9 January 1968. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011791
He had served 2 years and 10 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and his marksmanship awards. Record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the CIB effective 23 October 1969 and the AGCM for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057243C070420
There is sufficient evidence to show that the applicant was wounded on 26 March 1969 while serving as an infantryman in Vietnam and that he was treated by medical personnel. Although these awards were authorized subsequent to the applicant’s separation from active duty, the Board concluded, in the interest of equity, that the applicant’s record should be corrected to include these awards at this time. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000307C070205
John Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant sustained shrapnel wounds in Vietnam and that he was treated by medical personnel at the time; however, it appears that an administrative oversight resulted in his not being awarded the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...