Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040005083C070208
Original file (040005083C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        29 MARCH 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20040005083


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Deborah L. Brantley           |     |Senior Analyst       |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Melvin Meyer                  |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Patrick McGann                |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Susan Powers                  |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he never received the Purple Heart after being
burned in Okinawa and spending 14 days in the hospital.  He states that he
was burned after a bomb exploded.  He states he was told he would receive
the Purple Heart but never did.

3.  The applicant provides no evidence in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
which occurred on 17 March 1946.  The application submitted in this case is
dated
21 July 2004.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  Records available to the Board indicate that the applicant served on
active duty between March 1942 and March 1946.  He arrived in Okinawa in
August 1945.

4.  The applicant's original service medical records indicate that he
sustained "NB" (nonbattle) first and second degree burns over his face,
arms, legs and trunk.  The documents noted that the burns were accidentally
incurred when a gasoline garbage pit ignited on 14 September 1945.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple
Heart is awarded for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action.
Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the
result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a
medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of
official record.  Wounds or injuries which were accidentally incurred do
not qualify for an award of the Purple Heart.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence available to the Board indicates that the applicant's
burns resulted from a gasoline garbage pit that ignited.  His injuries were
recorded as accidentally incurred and not the result of hostile action and
as such, the applicant does not meet the eligibility requirements for award
of the Purple Heart.

2.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in
error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would
satisfy that requirement.

3.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 17 March 1946, the date of his
separation from active duty.  However, the ABCMR was not established until
2 January 1947.  As a result, the time for the applicant to file a request
for correction of any error or injustice expired on 1 January 1950.
However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of
limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to
show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to
timely file.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___MM__  ___PM __  ___SP __  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




                                  ______Melvin Meyer_______
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040005083                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20050329                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |107.00                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005199

    Original file (20120005199.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in Okinawa, Japan in 1945. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. The evidence clearly shows he received burns to his right leg and that those burns were given medical treatment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016445

    Original file (20130016445.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the applicant may have sprained his ankle when he jumped off a tank, there is no evidence that this injury was sustained as a result of hostile action. His WD AGO Form 53-55 does not indicate he received a combat-related wound and he has not provided any evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action. Notwithstanding his sincerity that he sustained an injury caused by an enemy bullet or shrapnel, in the absence of documentation that conclusively shows...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006137

    Original file (20080006137.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records contain a DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record). There are no orders in the applicant’s military service records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. Thus, based on the available evidence, the applicant’s claim to the Purple Heart is not supported by the evidence of record in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106971C070208

    Original file (2004106971C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. His report of separation shows that he entered on active duty on 12 August 1943 and served in the 147th Field Artillery Battalion (158th Regimental Combat Team) in the Asiatic Pacific Theater during World War II beginning in March 1944, and returning to the United States in February 1946. Consequently, his request for award of the Purple Heart cannot be granted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088093C070403

    Original file (2003088093C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) indicates that the 6th Armored Infantry Regiment was cited for award of the Distinguished Unit Citation for the period 13 December 1943 to 12 January 1944 by War Department General Order 64-47. The evidence of record shows that the applicant suffered from trench foot during World War II and was hospitalized for 32 days. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009102

    Original file (20070009102.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Purple Heart be added to his WD AGO Form 53-55, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge. Item 34 (Wounds Received in Action), of the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55, shows the entry, "None." Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by: a. awarding the applicant the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal, with four bronze service stars, and the World War II...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080262C070215

    Original file (2002080262C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073615C070403

    Original file (2002073615C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award. The Board also noted that the applicant’s discharge document does not show any unit awards. Based on the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart, especially in view of the evidence of record which shows that the applicant was not wounded or injured as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010370

    Original file (20140010370.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 February 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140010370 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states that he received disability retirement for line-of-duty injuries that he incurred while serving in Vietnam and believes that he should have been awarded the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085520C070212

    Original file (2003085520C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In order to support awarding a member the PH, it is necessary to establish that the wound, for which the award is being made, required treatment by a medical officer. During its original review of the case, the Board found the standard evidentiary records required for awarding the PH were not present. In the opinion of the Board, the War Department notification to the applicant’s mother, and to government officials from the State of Illinois, that the applicant had been wounded in action...