| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | Analyst |
| Mr. Walter T. Morrison | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member | |
| Mr. Lawrence Foster | Member |
2. The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous application to correct his military records by awarding him the Purple Heart (PH).
3. The applicant states, in response to the PH criteria cited in his original case that indicated that there must be evidence showing that the wound for which a PH is being awarded required treatment by a doctor, that he was treated by many doctors over an extended period. He states that he was severely burned when the fuel from a gasoline can ignited when a shell exploded ten feet from his position during an enemy artillery barrage. The applicant further states that he was treated in the field by a medical aidman (MEDIC), after which he was transported to a field hospital by ambulance. At the hospital, he was treated by several doctors during his stay. He further claims that while in the hospital he stayed in and out of a deep sleep as a result of the medication he was receiving. He states that he remembers being awakened from this sleep one morning and finding a major in dress uniform placing a PH at his side and congratulating him.
4. The Memorandum of Consideration (MOC) of the Board’s 29 October 2002 review of the case (AR2002073844) is incorporated herein by reference as if wholly set forth.
5. The separation document (WD AGO Form 53-55) issued to the applicant on the date of his discharge shows that he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 11 February 1943. He continuously served on active duty until being honorably separated on 1 November 1945. This document also shows that he served with the Cannon Company of the 115th Infantry Regiment in the European Theater of Operations (ETO) from
3 November 1943 through 7 October 1945.
6. The available reconstructed record contains a military record finding report from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), dated 24 June 2002. This document contains information from hospital admission cards created by the Office of The Surgeon General (OTSG) for the period 1942-1945. It indicates that the applicant was hospitalized and treated for burns received from flaming liquid as a result of a gasoline explosion in June of 1944.
7. The reconstructed file also contains a copy of a War Department letter from The Adjutant General (TAG) of the Army to the applicant’s mother, dated 26 July 1944. In this letter, the Army TAG confirms that the applicant had been seriously injured in action on 22 June 1944.
8. There are also letters on file that were sent to the applicant’s mother from the Governor and a United States Senator from the State of Illinois in September 1944. These letters indicate that these officials had learned of the War Department’s notification that the applicant had been wounded in action while serving his country.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. Paragraph 2-8 contains the regulatory guidance pertaining to awarding the PH. It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded to any member of an Armed Forces who, while serving in any capacity with one of the Armed Services after 5 April 1917, has been wounded or killed as a result of hostile action by an enemy.
10. The awards regulation defines a wound as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force or agent sustained as a result of enemy action. In order to support awarding a member the PH, it is necessary to establish that the wound, for which the award is being made, required treatment by a medical officer. This treatment must be supported by records of medical treatment for the wound or injury received in action, and must have been made a matter of official record.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s claim of entitlement to the PH, and it finds this contention has merit. By regulation, in order to support awarding the PH, it is necessary to establish that a member was wounded or injured in action, the wound or injury required treatment, and this treatment was made a matter of official record.
2. The OTSG hospital admission card on file confirms that the applicant was hospitalized for burns in June 1944. In its original decision, the Board did not question the medical treatment of the applicant for these burn injuries. However, it did determine that there was insufficient evidence to show that the applicant was injured as a result of enemy action, as opposed to being injured in a
non-battle related accident.
3. During its original review of the case, the Board found the standard evidentiary records required for awarding the PH were not present. However, it now finds that the Army TAG letter of 26 July 1944, which specifically states that the applicant was “injured in action on 22 June 1944”, provides sufficient confirmation that the applicant was categorized as a battle casualty by the War Department. This status is further corroborated in the September 1944 letters from the Governor and a United States Senator from the State of Illinois, which both verify that they had learned of the War Department’s notification that the applicant had been wounded in action while serving his country.
4. In the opinion of the Board, the War Department notification to the applicant’s mother, and to government officials from the State of Illinois, that the applicant had been wounded in action while serving his country more than sufficiently corroborates the applicant’s claim that his burn injuries were received as a result of enemy action. Therefore, the Board concludes that it would be appropriate to award him the PH at this time.
5. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, correcting the applicant’s records as recommended below would correct an error or rectify an injustice.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Purple Heart for being wounded in action on 22 June 1944, while serving as a private first class in the ETO during World War II; and by providing him a corrected separation document that reflects this change.
BOARD VOTE:
__LF__ _WTM__ __LE__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ____GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ___ DENY APPLICATION
Walter T. Morrison
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
| CASE ID | AR2003085520 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | AR2002073844 |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/06/ |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | HD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1945/11/01 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 615-365 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Demobilization |
| BOARD DECISION | Grant |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 61 | 107.0015 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088093C070403
Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) indicates that the 6th Armored Infantry Regiment was cited for award of the Distinguished Unit Citation for the period 13 December 1943 to 12 January 1944 by War Department General Order 64-47. The evidence of record shows that the applicant suffered from trench foot during World War II and was hospitalized for 32 days. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106971C070208
The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. His report of separation shows that he entered on active duty on 12 August 1943 and served in the 147th Field Artillery Battalion (158th Regimental Combat Team) in the Asiatic Pacific Theater during World War II beginning in March 1944, and returning to the United States in February 1946. Consequently, his request for award of the Purple Heart cannot be granted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009165
The applicant provides a self-authored letter, dated 18 November 2008, requesting that his father be awarded the Purple Heart; a copy of the deceased FSMs State of Louisiana Certificate of Death; a copy of his deceased mothers State of Louisiana Certificate of Death; two copies of a memorandum from the deceased FSM addressed to the Adjutant General, dated 22 August 1945, requesting that he be furnished copies of orders awarding him the Purple Heart; two copies of the deceased FSMs...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006834
Additionally, he received a copy of his military record and noted the following wounds were not annotated: * 16 February 1944, Anzio, Italy, head wound * 2 April 1944, Anzio, Italy, back wound * 8 April 1944, Anzio, Italy, finger wound * 28 December 1944, Colmar, France, hand wound * 9 January 1945, Orbey, France, leg wounds * 4 April 1945, Eichenbach, Germany, chest wound 3. The applicant provides: * Letter, dated 12 October 2010 * Excerpt from a newspaper, dated May 2011 * Self-authored...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056045C070420
The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. By regulation, in order to support awarding a member the PH, it is necessary to establish that the wound for which the award is being made required treatment by a medical officer. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the PH for a wound he received in action, on 10 October 1944, while serving as a PFC, in the ETO during World War II;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060645C070421
Paragraph 5-11 contains guidance on awarding the World War II Victory Medal and states, in pertinent part, that it is awarded to members who served between 7 December 1941 and 31 December 1946. While the evidence of record does confirm that the applicant was hospitalized on three separate occasions while serving in the ETO, it gives no indication that any of these hospitalizations were the result of his being wounded or injured in action. That all of the Department of the Army records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008696C070208
Yolanda Maldonado | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. By regulation, in order to support awarding a member the PH, it is necessary to establish that the member was wounded in action, treated for the wound received in action and the record of this treatment must have been made a matter of official record. The OTSG Hospital Admission Record and TAG notification letters confirm the applicant was wounded in action...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012743C071029
The evidence of record includes military medical treatment records and OTSG Hospital Admission Records confirming that the applicant was hospitalized and treated for trench foot, deafness, and psychoneurosis/anxiety while on active duty. The applicant's military record is void of any entries or medical treatment records that indicate he received and/or was treated for a shrapnel wound while serving on active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009582
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence not only that a member was wounded as a result of enemy action, but also that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel and this treatment was made a matter of official record. In this case, while the applicants notebook entry appears to support his assertion he was treated for a shrapnel wound to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004182C070206
The applicant was also informed that the evidence he provided failed to show he was ever treated for wounds received as a result of enemy action, and his PH request was denied. The medical evidence of record does show the applicant was treated for a knee injury in June 1947. The record also includes the applicant’s DA Form 20, which contains a blank entry in Item 40, which indicates the applicant was never wounded in action, and the PH is not included in the list of authorized earned...