| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Lana E. McGlynn | Member | |
| Ms. Yolanda Maldonado | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected in a manner which would establish his eligibility to the Montgomery G.I. Bill (MGIB).
2. The applicant states the he was honorably discharged due to weight control failure. His brother, who was discharged under honorable conditions, receives MGIB benefits. He implies that he does not believe it to be equitable for his brother to receive MGIB benefits with a General Discharge Certificate when he is ineligible for those benefits with an Honorable Discharge Certificate.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of injustice which occurred on 14 October 1998. The application submitted in this case is dated 5 March 2003.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. The applicant’s records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years on 30 October 1996.
4. He completed his initial entry training and was awarded the military occupational specialty of corrections specialist.
5. On 31 August 1998, the applicant’s commander notified the applicant of his intent to recommend him for involuntary separation due to weight control failure and of his rights in conjunction with that recommendation. In that notification it was also stated that “You are required to report to the Army Education Center to receive counseling concerning earned education benefits as required by law (10 USC 1046).”
6. The applicant waived his rights. Accordingly, on 14 October 1998 the applicant was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement). The reason for his separation was weight control failure. He had 1 year, 11 months and 15 days of active duty. While the applicant was outprocessing from active duty, he and a transition counselor completed a pre-separation counseling checklist. In that checklist, the applicant indicated that he desired counseling on MGIB benefits. The applicant later signed that pre-separation counseling checklist in the block indicating that he was offered counseling on all the issues he requested counseling.
7. The MGIB, as outlined in Title 38, United States Code, provides for soldiers who entered the service after 30 June 1985, to be automatically enrolled into the MGIB and to contribute $1,200.00 during their first 12 months service, which is nonrefundable. Law specifies that if a soldier is separated prior to the normal expiration of his or her term of service, the separation must be for hardship, medical disability or for the convenience of the government. Also, he or she must have served in excess of 20 months for an enlistment of less than 3 years, and in excess of 30 months for an enlistment of 3 years or more. In all cases, the soldier’s service must be considered fully honorable.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant is not eligible for the MGIB because he did not complete his
3-year enlistment. He was not eligible for the MGIB with reduced service because he did not complete 30 months of his 3-year enlistment, and was not separated for hardship, medical disability or for the convenience of the government.
2. The applicant should have been aware that he was not eligible to receive benefits under the MGIB because of the nature of his separation. He was required by his commander to be counseled on how his separation would affect his MGIB benefits, and the applicant indicated on his pre-separation counseling checklist that he received educational benefits counseling.
3. As such, unless the applicant can show that an error or injustice occurred in his separation, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.
4. Whether the applicant’s brother receives MGIB benefits or not is not germane to this case. A veteran either meets the requirements for MGIB benefits as prescribed by Title 38, US Code, or he or she doesn’t.
5. Records show the applicant should have discovered the error or injustice now under consideration on 14 October 1998; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 14 October 2001. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___lem __ ____ym__ ____rvo_ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | YYYYMMDD |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03098361C070212
Although the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) from her enlisted active duty service was available to the Board, only her Cadet Record Brief was available from her time as an ROTC cadet. The statement of support, submitted by the PMS at the University of Oklahoma stated that the applicant went through an extreme personal hardship while contracted as an Army ROTC scholarship cadet, and that following the death of her first brother in 1995 she “drove to Texas every weekend...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007428
The applicant requests, in effect, that the Yes block in Item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veterans Educations Assistance Program (VEAP)) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 October 2002 be checked instead of the No block which will allow him to use his Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB). He was issued a DD Form 214 that shows the Yes block is marked in Item 15a. He was issued a DD Form 214 that shows the No...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510983C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to show that he contributed to the post-Vietnam Era Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP), and that he be made eligible for VEAP benefits by crediting him with 30 months of active duty if his separation is considered for the convenience of the Government, or 36 months if it is not considered for the convenience of the Government. Actually, by the time he entered active duty...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077537C070215
The applicant’s DD Form 214 also verifies that she was separated under the provisions of chapter 8, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of pregnancy. On 14 August 2002, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied the applicant’s request that the reason for her discharge be changed to hardship after concluding that the discharge was proper and equitable. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068226C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. After 5 days back in military control, the applicant again went AWOL on 20 August 1966. However, in this case, the Board finds the evidence of record confirms that the applicant’s conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011595C070208
The applicant requests correction of his records to show that he served in Korea and to show that he paid into the Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP). The GI Bill, as outlined in Title 38, United States Code, chapter 30, section 1411b, provided for Soldiers who entered the service after 30 June 1985 to contribute $1,200.00 to the program during their first 12 months of service. Therefore, applying current- day standards, as an exception to policy, he is entitled to correction...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00066
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His security forces commander assured him that he would have educational benefits under the (MGIB). They provided no recommendation. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055281C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010232
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, his discharge due to weight control failure be changed to a medical discharge or retirement. The commander advised the applicant of his right to have his case considered by a board of officers; to appear in person before a board of officers; to submit statements in his own behalf; to be represented by counsel; to waive any of these rights; and to withdraw any waiver of rights at any time prior to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01124
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2003-01124 INDEX CODE 110.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records reflect that she was discharged for the convenience of the government, not due to pregnancy, so she may be eligible for educational benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB). (See Exhibit F.) On 13 Aug 02, the...