Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091364C070212
Original file (2003091364C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied





                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:         24 February 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER: AR2000913643


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti            |     |Analyst              |


  The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor           |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Margaret V. Thompson          |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Lawrence Foster               |     |Member               |

      The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that block 27, Reentry Code, of his DD Form 214,
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected from
“NA” to a Reentry (RE) code which will allow him to reenlist.  He also
requests that his characterization of service be changed from honorable to
uncharacterized or that the reason for his separation be corrected to Entry
Level.

2.  The applicant states that he is precluded from reenlisting with “NA”
entered as his RE code on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant’s records could not be located.  The following
information was derived from the DD Form 214 supplied by the applicant,
himself.

2.  On 30 July 1998, the applicant entered Initial Entry Training (IET).
He completed his training and was awarded the military occupational
specialty of avionic mechanic.  He was honorably released from active duty
on 7 April 1999 and transferred back to his Army National Guard (ARNG)
unit.  He had served 8 months and 8 days of active federal service.

3.  The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant, Item 23, TYPE OF SEPARATION,
has “RELEASE FROM ACTIVE DUTY TRAINING” entered.  Item 27 has “NA” entered.

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 establishes the standardized policy for preparing
and distributing the DD Form 214.  Table 2-1 of this regulation states that
“NA” will be entered in Item 27, REENTRY CODE, of the DD Form 214 when
separating a reservist or guardsman upon completion of active duty for
training (ADT) or full time training duty.  Item 28 of the DD Form 214,
NARRATIVE REASON FOR SEPARATION, is based on regulatory or other authority
for separation.  For soldiers ordered to ADT, the entry “Completion of
period of ADT” is appropriate.

5.  In 1982 the Department of Defense directed the various military
departments to implement a new separation program, effective 1 October
l982.  This program essentially provides for the separation, in an entry
level status, of new personnel who are recommended for separation during
their initial 180 days of service, usually due to their inability to
complete their training.  These personnel will be granted an
uncharacterized discharge, unless they are being discharged for


misconduct wherein a discharge under other than honorable conditions is
warranted.  An honorable discharge will be granted to personnel in an entry
level status only if their service is so outstanding as to warrant an
exception to policy by the service secretary concerned.  Army Regulation
635-200, chapter 11 provides for entry level status discharges for Army
personnel.

6.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-9, mandates that separations be
described as Entry Level Status and uncharacterized if separation
proceedings are initiated while the soldier is in an entry level status.
The glossary of this regulation defines Entry Level Status as the first 180
days of continuous active duty.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Army Regulation 635-5 requires reservists and guardsmen who are being
released from ADT or FTTD to have “NA” entered in Item 27 of their DD Forms
214.

2.  Since the applicant was on IET, which is a form of ADT, “NA” was
properly entered in Item 27 of his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant was released from active duty upon completion of his
required ADT, he was not separated for Entry Level Status.  As such, the
reason and authority for his separation is correct and there is no reason
to change them.  In addition, it should be noted that Entry Level Status
separation is for cause, and is therefore derogatory.  A release from
active duty for completion of ADT is not derogatory.

4.  Since the applicant completed more than 180 days of active duty, he was
not in an entry level status.  As such, his service could not be
uncharacterized.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___rvo___  ____lf___  ____mvt__  DENY APPLICATION







BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.





            ______________________
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2003091364                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |YYYYMMDD                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |(NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)          |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |100.03                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000622

    Original file (20130000622.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show his service was characterized as honorable because he was in an entry-level status when he was REFRAD. h. However, to provide relief from the pejorative and inequitable reason and authority for REFRAD shown on his DD Form 214, it would be appropriate to issue him a new DD Form 214 showing he was REFRAD by reason of Secretarial authority under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017497

    Original file (20120017497.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * His DD Form 214 is missing information contained on both his Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) and Army/American Council on Education Registry Transcript (AARTS) * his primary and duty MOS are missing * his IET time is missing which should be evident through the awarding of his MOS * the Army Service Ribbon is missing * Item 17 is in error because he had over 180 days of continuous active duty service as evident in Item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) * He was awarded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016873

    Original file (20110016873.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to change his: * Characterization of service from uncharacterized to honorable * Narrative reason for separation from entry level status to completion of required service * Reentry eligibility (RE) Code from N/A (Not Applicable) to RE-3 2. Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003710

    Original file (20120003710.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show, at a minimum, that his service was under honorable conditions. The applicant states he completed active duty for training (ADT) without incident; however, item 24 (Character of Service) on his DD Form 214 was recorded as "uncharacterized." A DD Form 214 shows the applicant entered IADT on 8 September 1988 and he was released from ADT on 10 February 1989 under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011516

    Original file (20080011516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that the characterization of service on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from “uncharacterized” to “honorable” and the reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from "NA" to "RE-1." Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019786

    Original file (20110019786.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Character of Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "honorable" and item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) to show he was separated for medical reasons. The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the character of his service as honorable and he was separated for medical reasons has been carefully considered. There is no evidence showing he was released from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016736

    Original file (20120016736.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his 1989 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show an honorable characterization of service and a reenlist eligibility (RE) code other than "NA." Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administration Separations) states a member of a Reserve component (RC) who is not on active duty or who is serving under a call or order to active duty for 180 days or less begins entry-level status upon enlistment in an RC. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019598

    Original file (20110019598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to amend item 24 (Character of Service) to show honorable instead of uncharacterized. Chapter 4 of Army Regulation 635-200 states a Soldier will be discharged or released from AD upon termination of enlistment and other periods of AD or ADT. It specifies that "Soldiers of the USAR ordered to AD for a period in excess of 90 days will, upon release from AD, revert to control of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020804

    Original file (20090020804.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the character of service on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected from uncharacterized to honorable. The applicant states that while his DD Form 214 properly reflected his entry level status (since he had less than 180 days of active duty), because he was a Reservist he did not have the opportunity to serve over 180 days of active duty. As such, his service was properly uncharacterized.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021040

    Original file (20110021040.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to amend item 24 (Character of Service) to show she received an honorable discharge. It specifies that Soldiers of the USAR ordered to AD for a period in excess of 90 days will, upon release from AD, revert to control of the appropriate RC and the service of Soldiers specified in this paragraph who are in an entry-level status will be uncharacterized, even though they have completed...