Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091242C070212
Original file (2003091242C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied




RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:


         BOARD DATE: 15 JANUARY 2004
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003091242


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Margaret K. Patterson Chairperson
Mr. Allen L. Raub Member
Mr. William D. Powers Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. In effect, the applicant requests physical disability retirement or separation. He also states, "I was drafted at age 17 without a parent's consent. I would like to have the record straight."

2. In effect, the applicant states that he had surgery because of a pectus excavatum (undue depression of the sternum) when he was 15. During basic training the right side of his sternum tore loose. He was looking for help when it was brought to the attention of medical personnel. He did not want to be discharged because he could not get a good job because of physical examinations he could not pass. He was hurriedly discharged from the Army. He did have a problem with his chest. He is disabled and attempting to obtain a service connected disability [rating] at $807.00 a month because he did have it [chest problems] when he was drafted at age 17. He has been in primary care in Seattle.

3. The applicant provides a certified copy of his birth certificate, originally signed and certified on 21 September 1957, showing his date of birth as 20 January 1953.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant is requesting correction of an error which occurred on 15 October 1970. The application submitted in this case is dated 5 May 2003.

2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3. The applicant was inducted into the Army on 15 October 1970. His record of induction indicates that he volunteered for induction. It shows his date of birth as 20 January 1952. That record also contains the remark in item 16 (Physical Defects), "(pecto-escavating chest) Surgery 1968." On 19 October 1970 he completed and signed DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History), indicating his date of birth as 20 January 1952; however, the last digit "2" of that year appears to be heavily inked over another digit, perhaps "3," although it is difficult to tell. The documents contained in the applicant's records, to include the documents which he signed, all show his date of birth as 20 January 1952.

4. The applicant was assigned to Fort Jackson, South Carolina, for basic combat training. On 18 November 1970 the applicant was discharged from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 5, because he did not meet medical fitness standards at the time of his induction. The record of his discharge proceedings is not available to this Board. He had 1 month and 4 days of service. His DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge), which he signed attesting to its accuracy, shows his date of birth as 20 January 1952.

5. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for separation of enlisted personnel from active duty. Paragraph 5-11 provides for the early separation of soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty. Medical proceedings, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate military medical authority within 6 months of the soldier’s initial entry on active duty, which would have permanently or temporarily disqualified him for entry into the military service had it been detected at that time, and which does not disqualify him for retention in the military service under the provisions of Army Regulation 40-501, Chapter 3.
6. Title 10, United States Code, Chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his office, rank, grade or rating because of disability incurred while entitled to basic pay.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1. The record clearly indicates that the applicant had surgery on his chest prior to his entry into the Army. The applicant himself states that he had medical problems prior to his induction. Absent evidence to the contrary, the applicant was properly discharged because he did not meet the medical fitness standards at the time of his induction. He has not provided any evidence to the contrary. His disability was not incurred while on active duty. Consequently, he is not entitled to physical disability retirement or separation.

2. Whether or not the applicant was born in 1952 or in 1953 [as he states] is not readily apparent in spite of the certificate he furnishes with his request. What is apparent is the fact that at the time of his induction he provided information to
various officials, both prior to and after his induction, that he was born in 1952.
Thirty-three years after his discharge, the applicant now wants to set the record straight. These proceedings will be filed in his records; however, there is neither error nor any action required by the Board in this matter.




3. Records show the applicant should have discovered the error or injustice now under consideration on 18 November 1970; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 17 November 1973. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__MKP__ __ALR __ __WDP__ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case are insufficient to warrant the relief requested, and therefore, it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.




                  __Margaret K. Patterson___
                  CHAIRPERSON





INDEX

CASE ID AR2003091242
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20040115
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 108.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00157

    Original file (PD 2014 00157.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Rating the condition as “moderate” would result in a 10% rating, no different from the ratings posted by the PEB and VA, so the Board considered whether the condition could be rated as “moderately severe” at 20%. During the 5 years prior to separation, the CI noted increasing pain, stiffness, decreased ROM and increasing difficulty performing required duties. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001805

    Original file (20090001805.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides, in support of his application, the front pages of his Standard Form (SF) 88 (Report of Medical Examination) and SF 93 (Report of Medical History) from his physical examination on 19 October 1976; a two-page SF 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care), initially dated 24 January 1977; a DA Form 3349 (Medical Condition - Physical Profile Record), dated 26 January 1977; a DA Form 2496 (Disposition Form), subject: Placement on Outpatient Medical Hold Status, dated 27...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059810C070421

    Original file (2001059810C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. On 11 January 1954, the applicant’s commander requested that he appear before a board of officers convened under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368, to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000052

    Original file (20090000052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant further states that, at a later date, he requested a medical waiver in order to reenter the Army and it was granted after he was found physically fit for military service. The applicant provides a self-authored statement, a DA Form 3947 (Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) Proceedings), two DA Forms 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings), two requests for medical waivers, two DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), and 27 pages extracted from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029747

    Original file (20100029747.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 30 January 2002, an informal PEB convened at Fort Sam Houston, TX, and found the applicant's condition prevented him from performing the duties required of his grade and specialty and determined that he was physically unfit due to chronic low back pain, with no neurological abnormality or muscle spasms, status post L4-S1 lumbar fusion in treatment of spondylolisthesis. He was rated under the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and was granted a 10% disability rating based on...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01497

    Original file (PD2012 01497.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB also forwarded right shoulder pain, hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hypercholesterolemia, identified in the rating chart below, as not disqualifying.The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the chronic LBP conditionas unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions were determined to meet retention standards and therefore to be not unfittingand not ratable.The CI made no...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00637

    Original file (PD2011-00637.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Formal PEB (FPEB) adjudicated the non-cardiac chest pain condition as unfitting, rated 10%; additionally, history of trauma to sternum with arthritic changes condition was considered category II, related but not separately unfitting. Cardiac causes for the chest pain were ruled out and although some significant gastroenterological conditions were noted, none contributed to the CI’s chest pain. While the initial and reconsideration PEBs determined the CI was fit for duty, an FPEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00524

    Original file (PD2012 00524.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB also forwarded right shoulder pain, hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hypercholesterolemia, identified in the rating chart below, as not disqualifying.The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the chronic LBP conditionas unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions were determined to meet retention standards and therefore to be not unfittingand not ratable.The CI made no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101189C070208

    Original file (2004101189C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board. The Reasons for Decision also noted that his service medical records showed that his asthma was considered to be stable by the time he was separated. On 30 July 2002, the ABCMR considered the applicant's request to correct his records to show his correct date of birth, to show that he completed basic training and advanced individual training, that "fraudulent" changes made to his health and dental records be corrected; that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000239

    Original file (20100000239.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    f. The 2006 VA disability rating continued the 1989 disability rating for his wrist fusion at 20 percent. The available medical records for the applicant's testicular pain shows: a. The available medical records for the applicant's Tietze syndrome and xiphoid process surgery show: a.