| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Senior Analyst |
| Ms. Joann H. Langston | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member | |
| Mr. Ronald J. Weaver | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states he never received the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant provides a statement from an individual who indicated he treated the applicant for a shrapnel wound to his left knee in January 1969.
4. The applicant also submits a statement from another individual who states he remembers the applicant being wounded in a fire fight.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an error which occurred on
30 August 1970. The application submitted in this case is dated 13 October 2002.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. The applicant’s military personnel records were not available to the Board. Information contained herein was reconstructed from information contained in the statements provided by the applicant in support of his request and a copy of his separation document.
4. The applicant served on active duty between 8 September 1967 and
30 August 1970.
5. His separation document indicates that he served as an infantryman in Vietnam between 9 April 1968 and 11 May 1969.
6. One of the statements, submitted by the applicant in support of his request was authored in September 2002.
7. The author of the statement indicated that he was assigned as the medic with the applicant’s unit and that during a fire fight in January 1969 he “began treating
the wounded which was extremely difficult under heavy fire conditions” and that the applicant “was hit with shrapnel in the left knee and was one of the many men I treated that day.”
8. The second statement submitted by the applicant in support of his request is undated. However, that individual stated that he remembers that “in January 1969 that [the applicant] was wounded in a fierce fire fight during an operation near Tay Ninh….”
9. There were no medical records available to the Board and the applicant provided none.
10. The applicant’s name was not among a list of individuals reported as combat casualties during the Vietnam War.
11. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. There is no medical evidence, nor has the applicant provided any, which confirms that he was wounded as a result of hostile action while in Vietnam.
2. Although the statements submitted in support of the applicant’s request do support the applicant’s petition for an award of the Purple Heart in the absence of more compelling medical evidence to support those statements, there is insufficient evidence on which to base an award of the Purple Heart.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.
4. Records show the applicant should have discovered the error or injustice now under consideration on 30 August 1970; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 29 August 1973. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__JHL __ __AAO__ __RJW __ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003090819 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030122 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009277
Another wave hit and the last thing he remembers is hanging on to a safety chain along the boat in water up to his knees. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Award) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Therefore, he is not entitled to award of the Purple Heart and its addition to his DD Form 214 at this time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003706
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no documentation in the applicants military personnel records that shows he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action. There is no evidence in the applicants military personnel records that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action; his DA Form 20 does not list the Purple Heart in item 41; the applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000040
The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was awarded the Purple Heart. He completed 2 years of active service during this period. There is no evidence in the available record showing he was awarded the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012068
Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20080009738, on 16 December 2008. The applicant provided a copy of a letter from a combat medic who stated that as a medic in the Republic of Vietnam, he remembered the applicant being wounded by shrapnel. In the absence of medical records that show the applicant was treated for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012703
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He received first aid from another Soldier and later the medic bandaged his injury. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018517
The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 10 June 1969. The applicant's contention that he was wounded in the Republic of Vietnam and the supporting witness statement he submitted were carefully considered; however, there is insufficient evidence to support award of the Purple Heart to the applicant in this case. There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart and there is no evidence in his service personnel records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017469C070206
On the date he was released from active duty, he had completed 1 year, 10 months, and 22 days active military service, with no days lost. As a company medic, he had numerous wounded to treat that day; many of those Soldiers with shrapnel wounds. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by a. deleting the Army Commendation Medal; the Army Commendation Medal, with "V" Device; and the Vietnam Service Medal from the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076212C070215
This document shows the unit, to which the applicant was assigned, was cited for award of the Valorous Unit Award for actions on 19-20 June 1969 by Department of the Army General Orders Number 53, dated 1970. There is no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records which shows that he was wounded or treated for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in three campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007166
There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. There is no evidence in the available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of corroborating evidence showing he was injured and treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statement and military photograph provided by the applicant are not sufficient...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003307
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 October 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150003307 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20130016895, dated 10 June 2014. In this case, the applicant's name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 does not show he was wounded in...