Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock | Analyst |
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Chairperson | |
Mr. Lester Echols | Member | |
Ms. Yolanda Maldonado | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
CASE ID | AR2003090618 |
SUFFIX | |
RECON | YYYYMMDD |
DATE BOARDED | 20040127 |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
DISCHARGE REASON | |
BOARD DECISION | DENY |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
2. | |
3. | |
4. | |
5. | |
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040007878C070208
The applicant requests that his reentry code of “4” on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed. The applicant was discharged on 30 October 2001. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091608C070212
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE : 1. The applicant was discharged on 24 October 2001. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067555C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 23 January 2002, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071220C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000151
On 23 March 2009, he consulted with counsel and requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10. However, the evidence of record confirms his RE code was assigned based on his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. Therefore, the applicant received the appropriate RE code associated with his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014072
However, his records do contain sufficient evidence to show that he voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial, under the provisions of chapter 10 (Discharge in Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial) of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Separations). Item 25 (Separation Authority) indicates he was separated under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010464
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 12 May 2000, After consulting with his defense counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or reason for discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010534
He again went AWOL on 14 July 2006 and remained absent in desertion until he surrendered to military authorities at Fort Benning on 14 September 2006 and was transferred to Fort Knox on 15 September 2006, where charges were preferred against him for the AWOL offenses. On 18 September 2006, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004755
Chapter 10 of the version in effect at the time provided that a member who committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment included a punitive discharge, could submit a request for discharge for the good of the service at any time after court-martial charges were preferred. It states that the SPD code KFS is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, by reason of for the good of the service - in lieu...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016881
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The applicant was issued an RE Code of 4 based on the narrative reason for his discharge, which was based on his approved request for a discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial.