Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090270C070212
Original file (2003090270C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied




RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 2004
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003090270


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Samuel A. Crumpler Chairperson
Ms. Regan K. Smith Member
Mr. Curtis L. Greenway Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected to show that she served as a commissioned officer in the Army Nurse Corps.

2. The applicant states, in effect, that at the time she enlisted she had a college degree and was unjustly enlisted in the pay grade of E-3; however, because she had an Associate in Applied Sciences (AAS) Degree and was a registered nurse, she should have been commissioned as a commissioned officer and served as a nurse. She goes on to state that her degree was in her records and her unit knew that she should have been given the military occupational specialty (MOS) of a nurse. She further states that her record will follow her for life and she would like it to reflect the truth and her.

3. The applicant provides a copy of her Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2-1, her college diploma dated June 1978, her registered nurse certificate and a copy of her divorce decree.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant is requesting correction of an injustice which occurred on 3 August 1984. The application submitted in this case is dated 12 April 2003.

2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3. The applicant enlisted in Brooklyn, New York, in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 4 August 1978, for a period of 6 years, enlistment in the pay grade of E-3, training as a medical and clinical specialist and assignment to the 74th Field Hospital, Bronx, New York. At the time of her enlistment she had completed her AAS Degree, which allowed her to enlist at a higher grade (E-3 vice E-1). She completed her training and was returned to her USAR unit, where she was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 1 August 1980.

4. On 7 February 1982, she was reduced to the pay grade of E-3 for inefficiency and on 26 January 1983, she was transferred from her Troop Program Unit to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training) due to unsatisfactory participation. She was honorably discharged from the USAR on 3 August 1984.

5. Army Regulation 135-101, in effect at the time, provided policies, eligibility requirements and processing procedures for appointment of commissioned officers for assignment to Army Medical Department Branches. It provided, in pertinent part, that personnel desiring appointment in the Army Nurse Corps (ANC) were required to submit an application for appointment. Enlisted personnel who met the established prerequisites after enlistment were also authorized to submit such requests. In all cases, the approval authority remained at Department of the Army Headquarters.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence of record or the evidence submitted with her application that she was denied the opportunity to apply for a commission as an Army Nurse at any time prior to or during her enlistment.

3. While the applicant may believe that she was qualified for a commission based on her AAS Degree, there are no provisions that automatically confer a commission based on a person’s education. Individuals may apply for and accept the terms of a commission if it is offered; however, it must be applied for by the individual concerned and qualifications must be verified before it may be offered.

4. The evidence shows that the applicant was properly enlisted in the pay grade of E-3 based on her education and that her contract was honored in its entirety by the Army and the USAR. Accordingly, there appears to be no errors or injustice in her case.

5. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 3 August 1984; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 2 August 1987. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

rks_____ sac_____ clg_____ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law. Therefore, there is insufficient basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




                  ___Samuel A. Crumpler___
                  CHAIRPERSON





INDEX

CASE ID AR2003090270
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20040203
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.14 102.0000/OFFICER APPOINTMENT
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019761

    Original file (20080019761.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 6.1.1.1. of DODI 6000.13 states that service on active duty or in an active status as a commissioned officer in any of the Uniformed Services, in the corps or professional specialty in which being appointed, shall be credited on a day-for-day basis with any commissioned service performed before such appointment. Evidence of record shows the applicant was commissioned a second lieutenant in the USAR, Army Nurse Corps on 4 May 1991. Evidence of record shows the applicant was again...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028125

    Original file (20100028125.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show she was granted 2 years of constructive credit upon entry on active duty in the Regular Army (RA). Part I, section B (Credit for Advanced Education Beyond Basic Qualifying Degree), she was granted a Master of Science Degree in Nursing from the University of South Florida, on 5 May 2000; c. Part I, section D (Credit for Professional Experience), she held an "ARNP Florida License" from 31 July 1995 to 18 November 2008; d. Part II (Prior...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008293

    Original file (20120008293.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests her record be corrected to show she was placed on the U.S. Army Commissioned List for August 2010 instead of 10 June 2011 (the date of her current commission). She ultimately decided to graduate from college on 13 August 2010 in lieu of waiting until she completed the ROTC requirements for MS 402. g. On 2 September 2010, she submitted a second CI requesting the PMS honor the letter from the APMS which stated that a battle analysis was the only requirement she needed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011125

    Original file (20110011125.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the original deliberations in this case the evidence of record and advisory opinion from the Active Duty Nurse Program Manager, USAREC, confirmed the applicant realized the benefit of constructive service credit for her qualifying (masters) degree by being granted 2 years of service in an active status when she was appointed as a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) commissioned officer in the rank/grade of first lieutenant (1LT)/O-2 and, based upon receiving said credit, she was promoted to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015103

    Original file (20060015103.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    (As a result, the Regional Personnel Actions Division, Army Reserve Personnel Command, St. Louis, Missouri, indicated that it had administratively corrected the applicant's records to show 3 years of constructive service credit; however, in doing so, actually only credited the applicant with 2 years and 364 days of constructive credit (i.e., 14 January 1981), not 3 years of constructive credit (i.e., 13 January 1981).) On 22 January 2004, the USAR ANC PM provided an advisory opinion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040006359C070208

    Original file (20040006359C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The following data were listed for consideration in computing active duty time: A) the applicant was commissioned on 29 May 1982, attended officer basic course from 21 July through 31 August 1982 and was subsequently assigned to Ft. Lee with a report date of 9 September 1982; B) from 1984 through 1987 she was assigned to Ft. Polk as a staff nurse and completed the officer advanced course from 18 May 1984 through 10 September 1985; C) in 1987 through 1989 the applicant was assigned to Ft....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014200C070206

    Original file (20050014200C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    William F. Crain | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The Army Nurse Program Manager noted that, according to Army Regulation 135- 101, chapter 3 and table 3-1, up to 3 years constructive credit was granted at the rate of one-half year per each year of professional experience. The applicant responded by maintaining that the applicable DODI Department of Defense Instruction and 10 USC provisions require that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008297

    Original file (20130008297.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, her pay grade be corrected to show E-4 on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 26 January 1980. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Since she was appointed to pay grade E-4 in the USAR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086421C070212

    Original file (2003086421C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the DA Form 5074-1-R, Record of Award of Entry Grade Credit (Health Services Officers) and the Constructive Credit Worksheet, dated 23 September 2002, be corrected and that she be increased to the rank of Captain, pay grade O-3. After a careful review of the applicant’s record, that office advised that the constructive credit granted the applicant on appointment to the Army Nurse Corps was incorrect. Records show that the DA Form 5074-1-R and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016101

    Original file (20070016101.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states that each reserve officer of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps who is in an active status or on an inactive-status list and who reaches the maximum age specified in section 14509, 14510, 14511, or 14512 of this title for the officer’s grade or position shall (unless the officer is sooner separated or the officer’s separation is deferred or the officer is continued in an active status under another provision of law) not later than the last day of the month in which the...