| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. G. E. Vandenberg | Analyst |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Hubert O. Fry | Member | |
| Ms. Mae M. Bullock | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That she be granted survivor benefits and that her late husband’s, a former service members (FSM), records be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart and Bronze Star Medal.
APPLICANT STATES: Her husband was only 6 months short of 20 years of service when he died. She states that she knows of others who were granted additional time in order to have 30 years of service for benefits. She also states that her husband’s medical condition was misdiagnosed by several military doctors.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The FSM's military records show:
He entered active duty on 14 August 1947 and served continuously until his death on 6 November 1966.
His records contain his service records under M____, his birth name, and W____, to which his surname was officially changed on 2 March 1949.
A 8 March 1965 DA Form 1041 (Election of Options Under Retired Serviceman’s Family Protection Plan) shows he elected not to have his retirement pay reduced to provide an annuity for his family.
His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows that he was hospitalized at Walter Reed Army Hospital on 23 July 1966 and that he passed away on 6 November 1966.
His DA Form 20 also shows he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal with Oak Leaf Cluster, the Good Conduct Medal (6th award), the National Defense Service Medal, the United Nations Service Medal, the Korean Service Medal with two bronze service stars, the Combat Medical Badge, the Drivers and Mechanics Badge with Wheeled Vehicle Bar, and the Expert Badge with Machine Gun Bar.
A review of the Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register does not show that he was entitled to any unit awards.
A review of the casualty registry for the Korea War did not list his name as a serviceman receiving a combat wound.
The available reenlistment and general medical examinations subsequent to his service in Korea do not show him as having received a combat wound.
His DD Form’s 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) of 1950, 1956,1962 under item 27 (wounds) state “NONE”.
The Uniformed Services Contingency Option Act of 1953 (COA) provided that a military member could elect to receive a reduced amount of retired pay in order to insure that his survivors (widow and/or children) would receive a portion of his retired pay upon his death in a retired status. Public Law 381, 87th Congress, enacted 4 October 1961, amended the COA by changing its name to Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan (RSFPP). It also made major changes concerning entitlement both to annuities and to Dependency and Indemnity Compensation payments to families of physical disability retirees but continued to require an election be made by the service member.
Army Regulation 600-8-1 (Army Casualty Operation/Assistance/Insurance) chapter 6 sets forth policy and prescribes procedures for the Casualty Assistance Program, entitlements and eligible personnel and lists the only monetary benefits payable to a survivor as the death gratuity benefit and/or any unpaid pay or allowances due the deceased.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. There is no evidence to show that the FSM received any combat wounds or that he was recommended for or authorized either the Purple Heart or the Bronze Star Medal.
2. The FSM’s wife is not entitled to any retirement benefits, as the service member was not retired at the time of his death.
3. Further, even if he had retired prior to his death, he had elected not to participate in the survivors annuity program. There is no evidence to show that he intended to change this option prior to his death.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
| CASE ID | AR2003090179 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20031016 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015310C071029
Edward E. Montgomery | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. A review of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) pay record on the FSM fails to show he ever made another annuity election under either the Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan (RSFPP) or SBP subsequent to his original election to decline coverage under the COA. It declared a 12-month Open Season for those members who retired prior...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015824C071029
Edward E. Montgomery | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record shows that the FSM enrolled in the RSFPP in conjunction with his retirement on 30 June 1967, and that premiums continued to be collected from his retired pay through the date of his death in 1995, more than 18 years after his first spouse died in 1977. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006310
The FSM's military service records show that he enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 5 August 1977. At the time both the FSM and the applicant were 59 years of age. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant applied for the SBP annuity in a timely manner and to pay her the annuity retroactive to the day the FSM would have turned age 60.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017621
There is no evidence in the FSM's military records and the applicant provides no evidence which shows the FSM participated in the SBP or the Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan (RSFPP). The SBP provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. Since there is no evidence of record which shows the FSM made an SBP election prior to his death, and the evidence of record shows he had opportunities...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007184
The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests her barred claim to receive a Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) annuity be granted dating back to her spouse's death. The applicant provides: * License and Certificate for Marriage * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * Orders 8-2 * Notice of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter) * DD Form 1883 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007341
The applicant, the un-remarried former spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that her ex-husband's records be corrected to show he elected to provide her an annuity as his "former spouse" under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Thus, it would be appropriate to correct the record to show that the FSM changed his SBP election from "spouse" to "former spouse" on the date of his divorce from the applicant, and to provide the applicant all SBP annuity payments due from the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000812
The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that she be designated as the annuitant of the FSM's Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The FSM's record contains a copy of a DA Form 1041 (Election of Options Under Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan) signed and witnessed on 4 March 1965, which shows in item 11 that he elected not to receive reduced retired pay in order to provide an annuity for his dependants. Extensive publicity was given in Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014581
The DA Form 1041 available indicates the FSM elected not to provide an annuity for his dependents. Although the FSM retired in 1968, there is no evidence to show he enrolled in the SBP when it was established in 1972. Since there is no evidence of record which shows the FSM made an SBP election prior to his death, and evidence of record shows he had opportunities to enroll in the SBP during Open Seasons, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028925
The applicant states the FSM did not keep up with his retired service member benefits. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090018686 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100028925 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001912
The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her late husband's records to show she applied for Active Duty Death Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for child-only coverage in a timely manner. Given the circumstances surrounding this case, and based on the applicant's eligibility for Active Duty Death SBP at the time of the FSM's death and her desired SBP election, it would be equitable to correct the FSM's records to show she applied for Active Duty...