| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Senior Analyst |
| Mr. Samuel A. Crumpler | Chairperson | |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Member | |
| Ms. Shirley L. Powell | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states he was “wounded in the line of duty during WW II” by shrapnel from a mortar hit. He states that he was taken to the medical headquarters for treatment.
3. In documents submitted by the applicant in support of his request, his daughter notes that attempts to locate people who could verify her father’s injury have not been successful. She stated that the officer who told her father that he would be recommended for an award of the Purple Heart was killed in action a few days after her father was wounded.
4. The applicant’s son-in-law states that the applicant “was involved during a battle near the Siegfried Line West Wall in 1945” and that he “received shrapnel in his face and neck when a shell exploded during an attack in the town of Wattsgoten or Shopphausen in Germany.”
5. In addition to the statements made by the applicant’s family members, he also submits an extract from an organizational “daily sick report” indicating that he received medical treatment in February 1945 and that the condition for which treatment was received occurred “in line of duty.” He also submits photographs in which he states that one photo shows his swollen face, while the other photo does not.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an error which occurred on
16 November 1945. The application submitted in this case is dated in 2002.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire. However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.
4. The applicant entered active duty on 20 August 1942 and served in the European Theater of Operations between November 1944 and August 1945 and was assigned to the 116th Cavalry Reconnaissance Squadron. His separation document indicates that he performed duties as a mortar gunner.
5. A “daily sick report” notes that the applicant received medical treatment on
21 February 1945 and that he was returned to duty. The condition for which the applicant received treatment, which was not recorded on the sick report, does indicate that it was incurred “in line of duty.”
6. In November 1945, after returning to the United States, the applicant underwent a physical examination. The original copy of that examination does not indicate treatment for any wounds or injuries incurred as a result of hostile action and there is no mention of any scars or swelling on the applicant’s face or neck.
7. The applicant was honorably discharged on 16 November 1945. His War Department Adjutant General Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) does not reflect entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 34 (wounds received in action) reflects “NONE.”
8. In the processing of this application, a search of the historical files maintained at the National Archives in College Park, Maryland, for the 116th Cavalry Reconnaissance Squadron were reviewed. Those files failed to confirm that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action during World War II.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. The fact that an injury was determined to have occurred in the line of duty is not, in and of itself, a basis for award of the Purple Heart but merely a conclusion that the injury was not the result of misconduct.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. While the evidence clearly shows that the applicant did receive medical treatment in February 1945 and that the condition for which he received treatment was determined to have occurred in the line of duty, there is no evidence which confirms that the condition was incurred as a result of hostile action. The applicant’s separation physical examination and separation document are both silent regarding the issue of the applicant having been wounded as a result of hostile action.
2. In the absence of more compelling evidence, unfortunately there is insufficient evidence on which to base an award of the Purple Heart.
3. Records show the applicant should have discovered the error or injustice now under consideration on 16 November 1945, the date of his separation from active duty. However, the ABCMR was not established until 2 January 1947. As a result, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 1 January 1950. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__SAC __ __JNS__ ___SLP__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003089977 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20031216 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001073
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart. There is no evidence in the documents the applicant provided that show he was treated for cold injuries. The applicants claim of entitlement to award of the Purple Heart for cold weather injuries he received while in the ETO was carefully considered.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011341
The FSM's military records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant is basing his request for award of the Purple Heart to the FSM on the WD AGO Form 8-24, dated 12 August 1945, which clearly shows the FSM sustained NBC gunshot wounds after being shot by a Frenchman who also shot into several U.S. The applicant provided insufficient evidence to show the FSM was hospitalized to receive medical treatment for severe frostbite or frozen feet while engaged in combat.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021515
He and his sergeant were wounded when a shell exploded sending him and his sergeant back into the trenches. The applicant provides Congressional correspondence and the following previously-considered and/or available documents: * Self-authored summary of service highlights * Letters from fellow Soldiers * Certificate showing another Soldier was awarded the Purple Heart * WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Service) * Honorable Discharge Certificate *...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023003
The FSM's military record is not available to the Board for review. The FSM's WD AGO Form 55 (Honorable Discharge from the Army of the United States) shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 December 1941. She provides a handwritten synopsis of the FSM's military service apparently written by a representative of the Red Cross that indicates he: * served 5 months of duty in Australia * was transferred to New Guinea * performed front line duty in the medical department at Buna *...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004661
The applicant, the son of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests award of the Purple Heart for injuries his father sustained in World War II (WWII), and correction of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) to show this award. As a secondary issue, the applicant requests correction of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 to show award of the: * Rome Liberation Medal (commemorative medal) * World War II Victory Medal * Army of Occupation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012517
She also requests, in effect, correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) to show the Combat Infantryman Badge. The FSM's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. His WD AGO Form 24 does not show any combat wounds or awards of the Purple Heart or the Combat Infantryman Badge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004012
The FSM's military service records are not available to the Board for review. There is no evidence to show this medical condition (that could appear as a head injury) was the result of being wounded in action or as a result of enemy action. In the absence of evidence that shows he was wounded/injured as a result of enemy action, and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02262
In accordance with Army Regulation 600-45, dated 22 September 1943, during the period in question, the PH was awarded for wounds received in action against the enemy or as a direct result of an act of such enemy, provided the wound necessitated treatment by medical personnel. The Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB), on behalf of the Secretary of the Air Force, has the authority to determine a veteran’s entitlement to the PH. The PH is awarded for injuries received as a direct result of enemy action.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003440C070206
The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which occurred on 17 July 1945, the date of his discharge from the U.S. Army. This document shows, in pertinent part, for "Alleged Disease or Injury, Date of Incurrence, Date(s) and Place(s) of Treatment:" the entry "Growth on foot, Feb. 1945, in Belgium. The applicant provides a self-authored statement summarizing the incident and resulting medical treatment, copies of documents showing follow-up medical treatment of the injury,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009002C070206
The applicant, as the son and next of kin of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his late father's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation) to show award of the Purple Heart and the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device. The WD AGO Form 53-55 contained in the FSM’s service personnel records does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award. The FSM's WD AGO Form 38 does not show that the shrapnel injury was incurred as a result of hostile action.