| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Paul Wright | Analyst |
| Ms. Joann H. Langston | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member | |
| Mr. Robert J. Osborn, II | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he was awarded the Army of Occupation Medal (AOM) with Japan Clasp, not Germany Clasp.
2. The applicant states his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) indicates he was awarded the AOM with Germany Clasp. He did not serve in Germany; he served in Japan.
3. The applicant provides: a copy of his DD Form 214; a Letter of Commendation, dated 1 August 1952, with a 1st Indorsement, dated 1 August 1952; a memorandum regarding the Letter of Commendation indicating he was assigned to Headquarters Company, Japan Signal Service Battalion, 8047th Army Unit; and a WD AGO Form 159 (Certificate of Officer Designated by Local Commander to Execute Declaration in Accordance with Current Rules and Regulations). The WD AGO Form 159 is signed by a Captain and shows a unit address of "Yokohama Main Store APO 503."
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an error or injustice which occurred on 26 August 1952. The application submitted in this case is dated 31 March 2003.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. The applicant’s military records are not available for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire. However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case. This case is being considered using reconstructed records, which primarily consist of his DD Form 214, the applicant's enclosures, and a page from the unit campaign register for World War II and the Korean War.
4. On 12 September 1950, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States. His DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty on 26 August 1952 after 1 year, 11 months, and 15 days of creditable active Federal service. Additionally, it shows he had 11 months and 7 days of duty overseas. Item 27 (Decorations, Awards, etc.) shows he was awarded the "AOM (Germany)."
5. On 23 March 1999, the National Archives and Records Administration in St. Louis, Missouri issued a DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards). That form indicates the applicant was entitled to the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp and the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM).
6. Army Regulation (AR) 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.
7. AR 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, for award of the NDSM for honorable active service for any period between 27 June 1950 and 27 July 1954, between 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, and between 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995. For the purpose of the award, the following persons are not considered as performing active service: (1) Guard and Reserve forces personnel on short tours of duty to fulfill training obligations under an inactive duty training program; (2) Any person on active duty for the sole purpose of undergoing a physical examination; (3) Any person on temporary active duty to serve on boards, courts, commissions and like organizations or on active duty for purposes other than extended active duty. The NDSM may be awarded to members of the Reserve Components who are ordered to Federal active duty, regardless of duration, except for the categories listed above.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Army of Occupation Medal (AOM) is awarded for service of 30 consecutive days at a normal post of duty in a qualifying location. Personnel at a qualifying location as an inspector, courier, escort, temporary or detached duty are precluded from eligibility. Qualifying service in Japan included service in the Japanese Home Islands, the Ryukyu Islands, and the Bonin-Volcano Islands between 3 September 1945 and 27 April 1952.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant served honorably and faithfully throughout his period of induction. He entered active duty in the rank of Private and was released from active duty in the rank of Sergeant (Temporary). He achieved that rank in a period of 1 year, 11 months, and 15 days active duty. There is no indication of any lost time or indiscipline in the applicant's available personnel records, nor is there anything else to show that he was otherwise disqualified from receiving the GCMDL by any of his unit commanders: He is therefore entitled to award of the GCMDL for the period 12 September 1950 through 26 August 1952.
2. The applicant's service is within a time frame listed for the criteria for the NDSM. Therefore, he is entitled to have this award added to his DD Form 214.
3. There is no evidence that the applicant ever served in Germany during the 11 months and 7 days he was assigned overseas. The evidence supplied by the applicant shows he was assigned to a unit or units in Japan prior to being separated. Therefore, his DD Form 214 is in error in listing the AOM with Germany Clasp; this should be the AOM with Japan Clasp.
BOARD VOTE:
__jhl___ __le____ __rjo___ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
| CASE ID | AR2003089093 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20040212 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT PLUS) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0056 |
| 2. | 107.0069 |
| 3. | 107.0067 |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001417
The FSM served a period of qualifying service for award of the NDSM. Even if it could be determined the FSM was awarded the AOM with Japan Clasp for service in Korea, that fact offers no help in determining entitlement to the KSM. The time period for award of the AOM for Korea expired on 29 June 1949; the time period for award of the KSM is 27 June 1950 and 27 July 1954.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003402
The applicant provides: * His DD Form 214 for the period ending 12 November 1952 * Two DA Form 1577 * An excerpt from a medical record * A letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), dated 31 January 2011 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. This document shows he had requested a copy of a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) which was not located; however, it was noted that his reconstructed record contained both DD...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002841
He states that his DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Army of Occupation Medal (AOM) and the Korean Service Medal (KSM). The applicant's complete military record is not available to the Board for review. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant's unit was awarded the ROK PUC.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018109
The applicant requests that the DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he was discharged in pay grade E-6; he was awarded the Korean Service Medal (KSM) with three bronze service stars, the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), the American Defense Service Medal (ADSM), the Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation (ROKPUC), the Army of Occupation Medal (AOM); and that he be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008943C070208
The applicant provides: a. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. In response to a request from the applicant, the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), St. Louis, Missouri issued the applicant a DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards), dated 11 October 1989, showing his entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, WW II Victory Medal, Philippine Liberation Ribbon, and Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal with 4 bronze service stars, representing...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000749C070206
His DD Form 214 shows award of the Army Commendation Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the 4th award of the Good Conduct Medal. Once the Korean War Service Medal has been authorized by the Department of the Air Force, the applicant may apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records to add this foreign award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061054C070421
This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. The evidence of record clearly shows he was entitled to award of the GCMDL for the period 10 May 1950 to 19 July 1952, the CIB, the NDSM, the UNSM, and 2 bronze service stars to the KSM. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was awarded the GCMDL for the period 10...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013122
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the KDSM is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. The FSM was awarded the VSM, and his records show he participated in four campaigns while serving in Vietnam. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the KSM, but does not show he received campaign credit for service in Korea.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070294C070402
The Board also noted that the applicant's DD Form 214 prepared at the time of his separation from the Army, which he authenticated in his own hand, shows that he was not entitled to award of the Purple Heart and that he was not wounded as a result of engagement with an armed hostile enemy. The Board also noted that there is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel or medical records that would support his contention that he was wounded in action during the Korean War. The applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060576C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. He was entitled to award of the Army of Occupation Medal (Japan) (AOM (J)), the Korean Service Medal (KSM) with 5 bronze service stars, and the Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation (ROK PUC). The evidence of record shows the applicant is entitled to award of the GCMDL for the period 12 July 1948 to 11...