| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Richard P. Nelson | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member | |
| Mr. Patrick H. McGann | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show “all awards” and the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states that he is a Vietnam Veteran and wants all awards he is entitled to.
3. The applicant does not provide any evidence or documentation in support of his request.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of error that occurred on 8 July 1970. The application submitted in this case is dated 18 March 2003.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. The applicant’s military records show that he entered active duty on 24 November 1967. He completed basic and advanced individual training and was trained as a Microwave Radio Equipment Repairman in Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 26L20. He then completed a tour of duty in Vietnam, where he voluntarily extended his overseas tour 110 days to take advantage of an early release program in effect at the time. The applicant was honorably separated from active duty on 8 July 1970 in pay grade E-4.
4. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214, which is authenticated in his own hand, shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Expert Marksmanship Badge with Rifle Bar, and two overseas service bars. No other awards or decorations are listed.
5. The applicant’s name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.
6. There are no entries in item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) that show he was wounded as a result of hostile action.
7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded to any member of an Armed Force who, while serving under competent authority in any capacity with one of the U.S. Armed Services after 5 April 1917, has been wounded or killed as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
8. U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided, in pertinent part, for award of the Purple Heart. The regulation stated that authority to award the Purple Heart was delegated to hospital commanders. Further, it directed that all personnel treated and released within 24 hours would be awarded the Purple Heart by the organization to which the individual is assigned. Personnel requiring hospitalization in excess of 24 hours or evacuation from Vietnam will be awarded the Purple Heart directly by the hospital commander rendering treatment.
9. There is no indication in the applicant’s personnel records that he was awarded the Good Conduct Medal. There also is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by his unit commander for award of the Good Conduct Medal. Records show the applicant’s conduct and efficiency were rated as “excellent” throughout his first 3 years of qualifying service and there is no indication of indiscipline in his service personnel records.
10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.
11. Department of the Army General Order Number 8, dated 1974, awarded all personnel assigned to the United States Army Vietnam from 8 February 1962 through 28 March 1973 the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm.
12. Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, authorizes award of a bronze service star, based on qualifying service, for each campaign listed in Appendix B of this regulation and states that authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate service medal. The appendix shows that the applicant is entitled to wear one bronze service star for each the following Vietnam campaigns: Tet 69 Counteroffensive; Vietnam Summer-Fall 1969; Vietnam Winter-Spring 1970; and Sanctuary Counteroffensive.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. There is no evidence showing that the applicant was ever wounded, or treated for wounds incurred as a result of hostile action, while in Vietnam. Therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his records to show this award.
2. The applicant is entitled to the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a period of qualifying service from 27 November 1967 to 8 July 1970. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award.
3. General orders show that the applicant is entitled to the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this unit award.
4. Evidence of record shows that the applicant received the Vietnam Service Medal and participated in four campaigns. As a result, the applicant is entitled to award of four bronze service stars, to be affixed to his Vietnam Service Medal.
BOARD VOTE:
__phm__ ____fne _ ___mhm_ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003089031 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | YYYYMMDD |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT , |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076325C070215
The applicant states that he did not receive a Purple Heart for being wounded in the Republic of Vietnam and was "R.T.O. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071654C070402
Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this unit award. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in four campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of four bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was awarded the Good Conduct Medal, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009333
There is no evidence in the available record and he has not provided any evidence showing he was awarded the Purple Heart. Records show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 15 May 1969 through 1 December 1970, b. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from item 24 of his DD Form 214, and c. adding to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086474C070212
There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010613
Based upon his service in Vietnam, which was of a duration longer than six months, the applicant is further entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal and to have it shown on his DD Form 214. Evidence of record shows that the applicant participated in two campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. by showing he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050008297C070206
The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Although the applicant's name is not shown on the Vietnam Casualty Roster, the preponderance of evidence shows that on 18 January 1970, while serving on active duty in Vietnam, the applicant sustained wounds as a result of hostile action and was treated for those wounds. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088427C070403
In the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this unit award.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018946
Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 27 August 1968 through 26 August 1970 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Purple Heart and the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars; b. awarding him the Purple Heart (2nd award) for wounds...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003145C070206
The applicant requests correction of his military service records to show he was awarded two Purple Hearts. The applicant's military service record shows that he was inducted into the U.S. Army on 17 September 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 8 June 1970; b. amending Headquarters, 27th Surgical Hospital (Vietnam)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072466C070403
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 1 April 1970 at Field Support Base Illingsworth in Vietnam, three awards of the Army Commendation Medal, the Valorous Unit Award, and in effect, four bronze service stars for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal. The Board also noted that the applicant authenticated his discharge document which shows that he was not...