| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Wanda L. Waller | Analyst |
| Ms. Kathleen A. Newman | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show two awards of the Purple Heart (correctly known as the Purple Heart with First Oak Leaf Cluster).
3. The applicant states that he was awarded his first Purple Heart on approximately 5 June 1969 at a firebase in Vietnam for shrapnel wounds to his legs and buttocks from a mortar attack. He contends that he was awarded his second Purple Heart on approximately 29 December 1969 at the Australian Base Camp for a shrapnel wound to his foot from a “clay-mor” mine. He also contends that he was hospitalized for nine days after he injured his groin area in August 1969 during a search and destroy mission. In support of his application, he submits a letter of explanation and an x-ray of a foot.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted on 7 May 1968. He served as a cargo carrier driver assigned to C Battery, 2nd Battalion,
35th Artillery in Vietnam from 20 January 1969 through 17 January 1970. On
20 January 1970, the applicant was released from active duty.
5. The applicant’s DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal and the Vietnam Campaign Medal as authorized awards.
6. There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.
7. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) on his DA Form 20 is blank. The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.
8. There are no medical service records available.
9. 23d Artillery Group General Orders Number 174, dated 20 December 1969, show the applicant received the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 7 May 1968 to 20 January 1970.
10. II Field Force Vietnam Artillery General Orders Number 130, dated
13 January 1970, show the applicant received the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service during the period February 1969 to January 1970 in Vietnam.
11. The applicant’s service personnel records show he participated in four campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam.
12. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) also shows the applicant’s unit is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 53, dated 1970.
13. Department of the Army General Number Orders 8, 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U.S. Military Assistance Command and its subordinate units during the period 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973 and to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to
28 March 1973.
14. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. The bronze oak leaf cluster is awarded to denote the second and succeeding awards of certain decorations, among which is the Purple Heart.
15. Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, authorizes award of a bronze service star, based on qualifying service, for each campaign listed in Appendix B of this regulation and states that authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate service medal.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board considered the applicant’s contention that he was awarded two awards of the Purple Heart. The Board also considered the x-ray provided in support of the applicant’s claim for award of the Purple Heart. However, there is no evidence of record available to the Board, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Therefore, the Board determined that there is insufficient evidence on which to base any award of the Purple Heart in this case.
2. The applicant received the first award of the Good Conduct Medal and the Army Commendation Medal. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these medals.
3. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in four campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of four bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, in accordance with the governing regulation, the applicant is entitled to the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars and correction of his DD Form 214 to show these awards.
4. The applicant’s unit received the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation while he was assigned to it. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this unit citation.
5. The Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation was awarded to all units which served in Vietnam. This unit award should also be added to his DD Form 214.
6. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records but only as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the applicant was awarded the Good Conduct Medal, the Army Commendation Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.
2. That so much of the application as pertains to any award of the Purple Heart be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
KAN___ LE_____ JTM______ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__Kathleen A. Newman______
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2003086474 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20031002 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
| 2. | 107.0000 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072466C070403
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 1 April 1970 at Field Support Base Illingsworth in Vietnam, three awards of the Army Commendation Medal, the Valorous Unit Award, and in effect, four bronze service stars for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal. The Board also noted that the applicant authenticated his discharge document which shows that he was not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024779
The applicant states his medical records clearly reflect he was wounded by enemy action on at least two separate dates, 16 May 1969 and 20 August 1969, while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 as follows: a. Delete the: * Vietnam Service Medal * Army Commendation Medal * Bronze Star Medal with Third Oak Leaf Cluster * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015156
The applicant states he was wounded in action in Vietnam on 2 October 1969. This pamphlet shows the 6th Battalion, 29th Artillery Regiment, was cited for award of the: * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 1 October 1966 to 31 October 1969 in Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 3, dated 1970 * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 29 July 1969 to 17 November 1970 in DAGO Number 52, dated 1971 *...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008892
There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Evidence shows that the applicants records contain administrative errors which do not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show award of the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with M-16 Bar, the Army Commendation Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071654C070402
Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this unit award. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in four campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of four bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was awarded the Good Conduct Medal, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013729
Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register), shows during his service with the 2nd Battalion, 12th Artillery, this unit was cited for awards of the: * Valorous Unit Award, for service from 1 May to 29 June 1970, based on DAGO Number 43, dated 1972 * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, for service from 21 February 1970 to 28 February 1971, based on DAGO Number 42, dated 1972 * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005407C070205
There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for any wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the clinical record provided by the applicant is not sufficient as a basis for an award of the Purple Heart. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009343
This statement indicated that the official records showed that the applicant was entitled to the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 23 February 1969. Based on the applicant's service with 2nd Battalion, 77th Artillery he is entitled to the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016788
Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 also shows that, at the time of the applicant's assignment to the 2d Battalion, 320th Artillery, it was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 18 March 1968 through 2 May 1970 by DAGO Number 48, dated 1971. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 also shows that, at the time of the applicant's assignment to the 1st Battalion, 321st Artillery, it was cited for award of the Republic of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019942
The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a qualifying period of Federal military service and correction of his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in...