Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088807C070403
Original file (2003088807C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 18 November 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003088807


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John N. Slone Chairperson
Mr. Mark D. Manning Member
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage.

3. The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM enrolled in the SBP for spouse coverage and that he continued to make payments for this benefit until the time of his death. She also contends that they divorced in 2001 and neither remarried. She also contends that as part of the divorce decree, it was ordered that she continue to be the beneficiary of the SBP. In support of her application, she submits an affidavit from her daughter and a copy of the FSM's death certificate.

4. The FSM and the applicant married on 29 March 1948. His military records show that, after having had prior enlisted and commissioned service in the U.S. Marine Corps, he was commissioned a first lieutenant in the U.S. Army Reserve on 30 June 1957. He was ordered to active duty on 14 July 1957.

5. The FSM retired on 1 November 1966 after completing 20 years of active service. He enrolled in the SBP on 1 October 1973 for spouse coverage, full base amount.

6. The FSM and the applicant divorced on 7 March 2001. The divorce decree indicates that the FSM was to continue to pay the monthly allotments for SBP and that the applicant would continue as the beneficiary under the SBP.

7. The FSM died on 7 February 2003. The death certificate shows his marital status as divorced.

8. Records at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) show the FSM continued to pay SBP premiums until his death.

9. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.

10. Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), enacted 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.

11. Public Law 98-94, enacted 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members.




12. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP. It permits a person who, incident to a proceeding of divorce, is required by court order to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse to make such an election. Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date of the decree of divorce. If that person fails or refuses to make such an election, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits the former spouse concerned to make a written request that such an election be deemed to have been made. Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within one year of the date of the court order or filing involved.

CONCLUSIONS
:

1. Although there is no evidence to show that either the FSM or the applicant requested that his SBP coverage be changed to former spouse coverage within the statutory one-year time limit, it appears that it was the FSM's intention to provide the SBP annuity to the applicant.

2. The FSM continued to pay SBP premiums after their divorce and he never remarried. It would be equitable to correct his records to show that he requested to change his SBP coverage to former spouse coverage in a timely manner.

3. In view of the foregoing, the FSM’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the FSM made a written request to change his SBP coverage to former spouse on 1 April 2001 and the request was accepted and processed by the appropriate office in a timely manner.













2. That the applicant be paid the SBP annuity effective 7 February 2003, the date of the FSM's death.

BOARD VOTE:

JNS___ MDM____ BJE_____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  __John N. Slone_______
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003088807
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20031118
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 128.1800
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000163

    Original file (20140000163.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The letter provided by the applicant from DFAS indicates that she was denied an SBP annuity because no election was made by the applicant or the FSM for former spouse coverage within 1 year of the divorce. Although there is no conclusive evidence that shows a proper former spouse election was made by the FSM, the applicant, or her attorney, the available evidence suggests that it was the FSM’s intention to provide an SBP annuity for the applicant. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005777C070208

    Original file (20040005777C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 March 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040005777 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072861C070403

    Original file (2002072861C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that the divorce decree ordered the FSM to designate the former spouse as his SBP beneficiary. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member is participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. That the FSM's former spouse be paid the SBP annuity retroactive to 6 June 2001, the date of the FSM's death.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000832

    Original file (20120000832.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. The divorce decree stated the applicant was to receive the FSM’s SBP benefits and the FSM agreed to pay the premiums. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the FSM requested, in writing, to change his SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001548

    Original file (20090001548.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests that she be provided an annuity under the FSM’s Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083486C070212

    Original file (2003083486C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. The applicant states, through counsel, that the FSM and she were married for 34 years. Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), enacted 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011260

    Original file (20060011260.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. The FSM and the applicant divorced on 21 September 1989. Although there is no evidence to show that either the FSM or the applicant requested that his SBP coverage be changed to former spouse coverage within the statutory one-year time limit, it appears that it was the FSM's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024255

    Original file (20110024255.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 99-661, enacted 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Neither the FSM nor the applicant took the required actions to change the FSM's SBP coverage to former spouse coverage within the 1-year time limit established by law and it appears the FSM stopped paying the premiums after his divorce. In...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011391

    Original file (20060011391.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), enacted 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members. Although there is no evidence to show that either the FSM or the applicant requested that his SBP coverage...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009877C070208

    Original file (20040009877C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election to former spouse coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The law also permits the...