| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deyon D. Battle | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member | ||
| Ms. Margaret V. Thompson | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable or a general discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That in reviewing his military records it appears that he did nothing good for his country. He states that he had a few article 15s and maybe his prior service background was not what this Board wanted; however, he did his best and he knows that he did some good for his country. He goes on to state that he can remember many times while he was in Vietnam that he saved or protected a life as he was in the field for most of his tour and as much as he hated it, he never complained. He continues by stating that he was often in combat day and night; however, his records do not reflect the hardships that he had to overcome. He states that he continues to have a host of problems and that his mind was all “messed up” and that he was never provided an opportunity to rehabilitate himself and that he was incarcerated for crimes that he did not commit. He states that it seemed like the Army gave up on him although he never gave up on the Army and that he has never worried the Army about what he thought as he loved what the military stood for.
The applicant also submitted a statement to this Board indicating that throughout his training, he believed that he had to be tough and that’s how he received his first article 15. He states that his behavior was explosive; however, he was young and he now knows that he was wrong. He refers to several incidents in which he received article 15s for being late either returning to or reporting to his assigned unit and he admits that his behavior was somewhat out of order. He also refers to an incident in which he states that he purchased marijuana believing that he was helping the family of an overseas boy. He concludes by stating that he tried to be a model soldier and he does not believe that he should have received an undesirable discharge.
In support of his application, he submits a letter from the criminal court of Shelby County, Tennessee, dated 18 February 2003; a copy of a Certificate of Psychiatric Evaluation dated 11 June 1970; a copy of his arrest record from the Bureau of Identification, Detective Division in Memphis, Tennessee.
COUNSEL CONTENDS: Counsel requests that the Board resolve any doubt in favor of the applicant.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 13 July 1967, he enlisted in the Army in Memphis, Tennessee, for 3 years in the pay grade of E-1.
Nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against the applicant on 31 July 1967, for wrongfully engaging in a fistfight in the mess hall. His punishment consisted of an oral reprimand, a forfeiture of pay and extra duty.
On 3 October 1967, NJP was imposed against him for failure to go to his appointed place of duty. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay.
On 14 December 1967, NJP was imposed against the applicant for being absent without leave (AWOL) from 4 December until 11 December 1967. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay and restriction.
He went on to complete his training as a radio telephone operator and on 16 December 1967, he was transferred to Vietnam.
The applicant was convicted by a special court-martial on 24 October 1968, of wrongfully having in his possession, marijuana. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 6 months, a reduction in pay grade and a forfeiture of pay.
A review of the record shows that the applicant was also AWOL from 15 January to 5 June 1969; 28 July until 12 September 1969; and 5 October 1969 until 15 May 1970. Further review of the applicant’s record shows that his conduct and efficiency ratings were unsatisfactory.
The facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant's discharge are not on file. The Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) indicates that the applicant was discharged on 23 July 1970, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212, for unfitness, based on frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with military or civil authorities. He had completed 1 year, 9 months and 21 days of total active service and he had 445 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement. He was issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
There is no evidence of record that shows that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-212, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 6a(1) of the regulation provided, in pertinent part, that members involved in frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities were subject to separation for unfitness. An undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. It appears that the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate considering all the facts of the case.
2. The Board has considered contentions made by the applicant and his counsel. However, the applicant’s contentions are unsupported by the evidence in the available record. The applicant was AWOL on four separate occasions. He had NJP imposed against him twice and he was convicted by a special court-martial as a result of his acts of misconduct.
3. He had a total of 445 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement and considering his numerous acts of indiscipline, it does not appear that the type of discharge that he received was too severe and the character of his discharge appropriately reflects his overall record of service.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__mvt ___ ___mm__ _rjw ____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003088170 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/09/30 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1970/07/23 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-212 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | 583 |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 592 | 144.5200 |
| 2. 594 | 144.5300 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060022C070421
He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 6 months and a forfeiture of pay. On 1 October 1969, the commander of the correctional facility submitted a recommendation to discharge the applicant from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unfitness, based on his frequent involvement in incidents of a discreditable nature with civil and military authorities. The applicant has failed to convince the Board through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072164C070403
APPLICANT STATES : That he was informed at his court-martial that his discharge would be upgraded after a certain number of years and it has not been done. On 21 August 1969, NJP was imposed against him for failure to obey a lawful order from the battalion commander and for failure to go to his place of duty. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020127
On 9 October 1967, NJP was imposed against the applicant for being AWOL from 23 September to 30 September 1967. However, his records do contain a duly-constituted DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) which shows that he was issued an undesirable discharge on 18 July 1968, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unfitness due to his frequent involvement in incidents of a discreditable nature with civil and military authorities. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011390C070208
Michael Flynn | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. Therefore, the applicant's record of service is insufficiently meritorious to warrant a general discharge or an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076102C070215
He had completed 2 years, 9 months and 9 days of creditable service and had 428 days lost time due to being AWOL or in confinement. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. There is no available evidence of record and the applicant provides none to show that he had any medical condition which indicates he was unfit for separation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013898
x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. In October 1967, he was assigned the duties of a cook. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (Army Regulation 15-185, paragraph 2-8), effectively shortens that filing period, has determined that the 3 year limit on filing to the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078245C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. On 29 September 1968, the applicant's counsel submitted a statement in which he indicated that he had counseled the applicant of the basis for his contemplated separation and its effect as well as his rights.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086021C070212
Another former company commander submitted a statement attesting to the fact that the applicant had to be recycled and that he would repeatedly go to sick call and miss training. There is no evidence of record that shows that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. He was recycled five times, he had NJP imposed against him three times and he was convicted by a summary court-martial as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001156
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 April 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080001156 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable or a general discharge. A review of the available record fails to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072150C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.