| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Elzey J. Arledge, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Thomas B. Redfern, III | Member | |
| Ms. Karen A. Heinz | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That he has been clean and sober for 14 years and his life has changed. He goes on to state that he is a certified nursing assistant in three States, is a notary in two States, that he took a course in drug addiction and works with addicts and mental patients as a counselor. He further states that he desires to clear his name after so many years of hurt and alcohol dependence. In support of his application, he submits three third party statements of support, which attest to his character.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted at Fort Jackson, South Carolina, on 13 June 1967, for a period of 3 years and training as a helicopter maintenance mechanic. He remained at Fort Jackson to undergo his basic combat training (BCT) and received good and fair conduct and efficiency ratings.
Upon completion of his BCT, he was transferred to Fort Eustis, Virginia, on 1 September 1967, to undergo his advanced individual training (AIT) as a helicopter mechanic.
On 14 September 1967, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for shoplifting at the post exchange. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay, extra duty and restriction.
The applicant failed to complete his AIT and was transferred to Fort Dix, New Jersey, on 18 November 1967, to undergo AIT as a light weapons infantryman. He successfully completed his AIT and was transferred to Korea on 30 January 1968, for duty as a rifleman. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 on 23 April 1968.
On 24 September 1968, NJP was imposed against him for having in his possession a false pass, with intent to deceive. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay, extra duty and restriction.
Although the specifics are not contained in the available records, his records show that NJP was imposed against him on 4 July 1968, which resulted in his being reduced to the pay grade of E-2.
On 12 February 1969, NJP was imposed against him for intentionally missing movement (his port call) on 30 January 1969, for his reassignment to Fort Lewis, Washington. His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-1, a forfeiture of pay and extra duty.
He departed Korea on 8 March 1969 and was transferred to Fort Riley, Kansas, where he reenlisted on 20 May 1969, for a period of 6 years and training as a machinist. He was scheduled to attend his training on 12 September 1969; however, he went absent without leave (AWOL) on 14 August 1969 and remained absent until he returned to military control at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, on 2 December 1969. He again went AWOL on 24 January 1970 and remained absent until 20 February 1970. He was transferred back to Fort Riley and again went AWOL from 28 February 1970, until he was returned to military control at Fort Lewis on 15 March 1970, and charges were preferred against him for the AWOL offenses.
He was convicted by a special court-martial on 19 May 1970 of being AWOL from 14 August to 1 December 1969, from 24 January to 20 February 1970, and from 28 February to 15 March 1970. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 4 months and a forfeiture of pay. However, the convening authority suspended the sentence until 18 September 1970, unless sooner vacated.
The facts and circumstances surrounding his administrative discharge are not present in the available records. However, his records do contain a duly constituted report of separation (DD Form 214), which was signed by the applicant and shows that he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 15 October 1970, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unfitness due to an established pattern of shirking. He had served 2 years, 9 months and 3 days of total active service and had 210 days of lost time due to AWOL.
There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
A review of the available records also fails to show that the applicant’s misconduct was alcohol related.
Army Regulation 635-212, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It provided, in pertinent part, that members involved in frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil and/or military authorities, established pattern for shirking, established pattern of failure to pay just debts, drug addiction, failure to support dependents and lewd or indecent acts were subject to separation for unfitness. An undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in accordance with applicable regulations with no procedural errors that would tend to jeopardize his rights.
2. Accordingly, the type of discharge and the reasons therefore were appropriate considering the available facts of the case.
3. The applicant’s contentions and supporting documents have been noted by the Board. However, they are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief when compared to his otherwise undistinguished record of service.
4. Although the Board can find no evidence that his misconduct was alcohol related, the Board commends him for overcoming his alcohol addiction and providing assistance to others in need. However, his record of service is such that it simply does not rise to the level of service under honorable conditions.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__eja ___ ___kh___ ___tbr __ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002072150 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/09/17 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1970/10/15 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-212 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Unfit |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 583 | 144.5000/a51.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086066C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that his discharge should be upgraded because he was accepted under lowered enlistment standards and he was diagnosed with an immature personality, passive aggressive type – chronic. After hearing testimony and reviewing the evidence of record, the ADRB again determined that the applicant was properly discharged and that there was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083527C070212
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. APPLICANT STATES : That his overall combat service was not given consideration at the time of his discharge. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013898
x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. In October 1967, he was assigned the duties of a cook. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (Army Regulation 15-185, paragraph 2-8), effectively shortens that filing period, has determined that the 3 year limit on filing to the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077239C070215
The Board considered the following evidence: On 6 March 1968, the applicant, still undergoing AIT, accepted NJP for being AWOL from 4-5 March 1968. Carl W. S. Chun Director, Army Board for Correction of Military RecordsINDEXCASE IDAR2002077239SUFFIXRECONDATE BOARDED20030313TYPE OF DISCHARGE(UD)DATE OF DISCHARGE19690415DISCHARGE AUTHORITYAR635-212DISCHARGE REASONA51.00BOARD DECISION(DENY)REVIEW AUTHORITYISSUES 1.144.50002.3.4.5.6.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004437C070205
Thomas Ray | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) on 28 February 1984 requesting that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (Army Regulation 15-185,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011418
He did not report until 6 May 1970 and NJP was imposed against him for that absence. On 1 August 1970, he was transferred to Fort Lewis, WA. However, his record contains a DD Form 214 that shows he was discharged on 8 September 1971 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 (Personnel Separations Discharge Unfitness and Unsuitability) for unfitness due to an established pattern of shirking, with issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078245C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. On 29 September 1968, the applicant's counsel submitted a statement in which he indicated that he had counseled the applicant of the basis for his contemplated separation and its effect as well as his rights.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071838C070403
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. He was in confinement from...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012275
The applicant states that he served 6 months in Vietnam and after 40 years and the amnesty granted by the President, he should also receive an upgrade of his discharge. The applicant was convicted by a special court-martial on 24 August 1967 of being AWOL from Fort Riley from 23 September 1966 to 19 June 1967. Accordingly, the applicant was transferred to Fort Lewis, Washington where he was discharged with an undesirable discharge on 22 June 1968, under the provisions of Army Regulation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006441
The applicant states he had over 30 months of good time when he was discharged. He should not have taken the discharge as he had only 4 months left for his discharge to be honorable. The available evidence does not show and the applicant has not provided any evidence that shows he had over 30 months of good service or that he had the option to wait 4 more months and he would receive an honorable discharge.