Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087867C070212
Original file (2003087867C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 14 August 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003087867

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor Chairperson
Mr. James E. Anderholm Member
Ms. Linda M. Barker Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to show he elected Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) option A.

APPLICANT STATES: That the evidence clearly shows that he did not make an RCSBP election. However, he was informed by the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) that option C was selected by default after 90 days. He and his spouse will be age 67 prior to receiving Social Security. He must pay back his Special Separation Benefit (SSB). The difference in option A and C over 7 years is approximately $30,000, over half his SSB pay back. His wife's entitlement after age 62 will drop from 55 percent to 35 percent. These factors will create a severe hardship on them. They have private insurance.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He was born on 6 January 1959. He was commissioned a second lieutenant in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 14 August 1981. He was voluntarily discharged on 30 September 1992 under the SSB. He was appointed a captain in the U. S. Army Reserve on 30 September 1992.

The applicant's notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) is dated 30 October 2002. Paragraph 4 of the 20-year letter informed him that a qualified Reserve Component member, who is married, will automatically be enrolled in the RCSBP under option C, spouse and children coverage based on full retired pay unless the spouse's concurrence was provided to allow a different election. He was informed he must notify AR-PERSCOM, using the enclosed DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate), of his decision within 90 days of the date of the letter. He was informed that detailed information concerning the RCSBP and costs was enclosed.

Paragraph 4 of the applicant's 20-year letter also informed him that, "ANY WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE (letter or forms) THAT INVOLVE A CHANGE FROM FULL COVERAGE UNDER OPTION C FOR SPOUSE REQUIRE THE SIGNATURE OF YOUR SPOUSE BEFORE A NOTARY, OR A RETIREMENT SERVICES OFFICER AND ONE OTHER WITNESS. FAILURE TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT WILL RESULT IN THE RETENTION OF FULL COVERAGE FOR YOUR SPOUSE AND CHILD(REN)" (emphasis in the original).

Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. If death does not occur before age 60, the RCSBP costs for options B and C are deducted from the member's retired pay. Before the law was amended as noted below, a member must have made the election within 90 days of receiving the notification of eligibility to receive retired pay at age 60 or else wait until he/she applies for retired pay and elect to participate in the standard SBP. In other words, failure to elect an option resulted in the default election of option A.

Public Law 106-398, enacted 30 October 2000, required written spousal consent for a Reserve service member to be able to delay making an RCSBP election until age 60. The law is applicable to cases where 20-year letters have been issued after 1 January 2001. In other words, failure to elect an option now results in the default election of option C.

Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation. Retirees have a one-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started, to withdraw from SBP. The spouse’s concurrence is required. No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll. Reservists who elected an option under the RCSBP will continue to have the Reservist Portion cost deducted from their retired pay. The effective date of termination is the first day of the first calendar month following the month in which the election is received by the Secretary concerned.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The Board notes the applicant does not contend that he did not receive his 20-year letter in a timely manner and so was unable to elect, with his spouse's concurrence, RCSBP option A. The Board therefore presumes that he received his 20-year letter, read it, and, as a senior commissioned officer, understood the instructions concerning the RCSBP, its costs, and the 90-day window in which to make his decision. The Board concludes that there is no evidence of Government error or injustice in this case.

3. The applicant will begin to receive retired pay in January 2019. He will have a one-year window of opportunity to terminate (with his spouse's concurrence) his SBP participation beginning in January 2021. The Reservist Portion of the RCSBP will still be deducted from his retired pay in order to pay for the protection his family received should he have died during the period prior to his reaching age 60.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__rvo___ __jea___ __lmb___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003087867
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20030814
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY Mr. Chun
ISSUES 1. 137.03
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002140

    Original file (20150002140.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 September 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150002140 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. This letter further informed her that: a. she was entitled to participate in the RCSBP, as established by Public Law 95-397; b. RCSBP enabled her to provide an annuity for her spouse and other eligible beneficiaries; c. she had, by law, only 90 calendar days from the date she received this notice to submit a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate); d....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029334

    Original file (20100029334.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he and his spouse elected not to participate in RCSBP. This memorandum notified the applicant that he had completed the required years of service and he would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. Once a member elects either Options B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005016C071029

    Original file (20070005016C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    John G. Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. His wife is a Master Sergeant in the U. S. Army Reserve and will have her own retired pay. Once a member elects either Options B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002540

    Original file (20090002540.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected to show she declined participation in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) and that she receive reimbursement for any and all deductions from her retirement pay. The 20-Year Letter, dated 28 July 2004, also stated that "NOTE: Public Law 106-398, 30 October 2000, requires that upon receipt of this Letter, a qualified Reserve Component member, who is married, will automatically be enrolled in the RCSBP under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020841

    Original file (20090020841.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states the following: * he was never informed he had to decline the SBP within 1 year of his divorce from his former spouse * he received no written communications from the military to keep him informed of these circumstances * the Tennessee Army National Guard requested that he complete a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) in 2008 for inclusion in his application for retired pay * he completed the DD Form 2656 and declined SBP 3. On 18 October 1991, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011376

    Original file (20080011376.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that when he completed his retirement paperwork, he elected not to participate in the SBP; yet, premiums are being deducted from his retirement pay. Reservists who elected an option under the RCSBP will continue to have the Reserve Premium add-on deducted from their retired pay. The evidence of record shows that within 90 days of receipt of his 20-year letter, the applicant elected to participate in the RCSBP, full spouse coverage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005935

    Original file (20090005935.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This letter notified the applicant that he had completed the required years of service and would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. Reservists who elected an option under the RCSBP will continue to have the Reserve Premium add-on deducted from their retired pay. The evidence of record shows that within 90 days of receipt of his 20-year letter, the applicant elected to participate in the RCSBP, full spouse coverage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012836

    Original file (20090012836.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, he requests that his military records be corrected to show he elected RCSBP former spouse coverage. The applicant's military records show that he was honorably separated from the New Mexico ARNG on 31 January 2008 and he was transferred to the Retired Reserve. If he is requesting only that his RCSBP coverage be changed from insurable interest to former spouse, based on the evidence of record he has already been refunded the difference in premiums between insurable interest...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028330

    Original file (20100028330.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law 95-397, the Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP), enacted 30 September 1978, provides a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 [upon which they would be eligible to begin drawing retired pay, upon request, and to participate in the SBP], to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. The evidence of record shows that in preparation for retirement, the applicant elected to participate in the SBP with full spouse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087473C070212

    Original file (2003087473C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...