Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087471C070212
Original file (2003087471C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 25 September 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003087471


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John N. Slone Chairperson
Ms. Regan K. Smith Member
Ms. Linda D. Simmons Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be granted a full year of creditable service for retirement for the year of 1968 and that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect his correct Social Security Account Number (SSAN).

3. The applicant states that he did not request an early discharge and the Army discharged him 10 days early, which is preventing him from receiving credit for a year of creditable service and receiving his 20-year letter, without having to serve an additional year in the United States Army Reserve (USAR). He goes on to state that he served 18 months in Vietnam and accrued 48 days of leave. He further states that he desires the additional 10 days and is willing to buy them back in order that he does not have to serve 21 years in the USAR to receive his 20-year letter.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on 27 December 1965, for a period of 3 years and training in the journalism career management field. At the time of his enlistment, the sixth digit of his SSAN was a "4". He completed his basic combat training at Fort Jackson, South Carolina, and was transferred to Fort Benjamin Harrison, Indiana to undergo his advanced individual training (AIT) in basic military journalism.

5. He successfully completed his AIT and was transferred to Fort Lewis, Washington, where he remained until he was transferred to Vietnam on 8 September 1966. He was assigned to the 5th Public Information Detachment for duty as a script writer. He remained in Vietnam for 18 months and departed on 8 March 1968, for assignment to Fort Sam Houston, Texas, for duty as a broadcast announcer.

6. On 17 December 1968, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) under the provisions of the Fiscal Year 1969 Holiday Early Release Program (Department of the Army Message 886383) and his expiration of term of service (ETS). He had served 2 years, 11 months and 21 days of total active service and was paid for 48 days of accrued leave. At the time of his REFRAD, his DD Form 214 was prepared to reflect that the sixth digit of his SSAN was a "1".

7. Upon his REFRAD, he was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his 6-year statutory service obligation. He was honorably discharged from the USAR on 17 December 1971.

8. On 24 March 1986, 14 years later, he enlisted in the USAR and has remained in the USAR through a series of continuous reenlistments. As of 23 March 2002, the applicant has 18 years, 11 months and 20 days of qualifying service for retirement at age 60.
9. A review of the available records shows that his records contain a copy of his SSAN card indicating that the sixth digit is a "4".

10. The Holiday Early Release Program is a voluntary program that was designed to provide for an orderly and equitable early transition from active duty during the Christmas/New Years holiday period. It has traditionally applied to personnel who have an ETS between the period of 1 December of the current year and 2 January of the following year and allows early separation, if the soldier desires, in order to arrive home before the beginning of the holiday season. Soldiers are allowed to participate in the early release program if they are eligible and request to do so; however, it is not mandatory that they do so.

11. Army Regulation 135-180 implements the statutory authority governing the granting of Retired pay to soldiers of the Reserve Components. It states, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for Retired pay, a person must have attained age 60, have completed a minimum of 20 qualifying years of service and have served the last 8 years of his or her qualifying service as a Reserve Component soldier. Service creditable as a qualifying year is one in which the Reservist is in an active status and earns a minimum of 50 qualifying points during the retirement year.

12. That regulation also provides, in pertinent part, that under section 1331(d) of title 10, United States Code (USC), each Reserve component soldier who completes the service required to be eligible for Retired pay at age 60 will be notified in writing within 1 year after he or she has completed that service in the form of a 20-year letter. A copy of the notification will become a part of the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The Board has noted the applicant's contention that he was separated 10 days early without his consent and finds it to be without merit. The applicant was separated under the Holiday Early Release Program which has always been a voluntary program and which requires an individual request to participate in. Although his request is no longer a matter of record, it must be presumed in the absence of evidence to the contrary that he was properly separated in accordance with the applicable regulation and the message announcing the Holiday Early Release Program.

2. Accordingly, the Board finds no basis to grant him credit for service that he did not perform. To do so would afford him a benefit not afforded to others in similar situations.

3. However, the Board does find that at the time of his REFRAD, an administrative error occurred in the preparation of his DD Form 214 which resulted in the sixth digit of his SSAN being reflected as a "1" instead of a "4". Accordingly, the Board finds that it would be in the interest of justice to correct the error at this time.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the sixth digit of his SSAN is a "4" instead of a "1", as currently reflected on his DD Form 214 dated 17 December 1968.

2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

__js ____ __lds____ __rks ___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  _____John N. Slone______
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003087471
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2003/09/25
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT PARTIAL
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 10 100.0900/ssn
2. 334 135.0200/ret pt credit
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001563C070206

    Original file (20050001563C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 OCTOBER 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001563 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. He departed Vietnam on 19 August 1969 and was transferred to Fort Campbell, where he remained until 17 November 1969, when he was transferred to Fort Hood, Texas. His records also show that he received “Excellent”...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001563C070206

    Original file (20050001563C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was wounded on 13 March 1969 and was awarded the Purple Heart for that wound. He departed Vietnam on 19 August 1969 and was transferred to Fort Campbell, where he remained until 17 November 1969, when he was transferred to Fort Hood, Texas. His records also show that he received “Excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and there is no derogatory information contained in those records that would serve to disqualify him for award of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007714C070206

    Original file (20050007714C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged injustice which occurred on 12 December 1977. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 12 December 1977; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 11 December 1980.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003125C070206

    Original file (20050003125C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Michael J. Flynn | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be given 1 additional day of service credit and that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect that he served 2 years of active service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was honorably REFRAD on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006768

    Original file (20110006768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his correct social security number (SSN). The evidence of record shows that the applicant correctly reported his SSN upon entry into the U.S. Army on 7 February 1967. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his correct SSN.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012287

    Original file (20060012287.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Combat Medical Badge (CMB), the Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR), the Driver’s Badge and that his records be corrected to reflect his qualifications with the machinegun and hand grenade, his award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), the Armed Forces Reserve Medal (AFRM) with “M” Device, his inactive service in the delayed entry program (DEP), his correct Social Security Account Number (SSAN), and his attendance at the law enforcement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077994C070215

    Original file (2002077994C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the military records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he was eligible for retirement and retired pay at age 60, and that she be paid a Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) annuity. The applicant’s counsel states, in effect, that this application is based on three legs. Since the deceased FSM had less than a month to qualify for retired pay, and his command requested a 20 year letter be issued...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017315

    Original file (20070017315.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his Social Security Account Number (SSAN) on his Honorable Discharge Certificate and discharge orders be corrected to reflect the number “0” in the fifth digit instead of the number “8” as currently reflected. He goes on to state that he was never issued a DD Form 214; however, years later he was discharged from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) with the incorrect digit of “8” in the fifth position of his SSAN. Accordingly, the applicant’s Honorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004622

    Original file (20090004622.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it was determined that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 29 May 1968 through 28 April 1970. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the GCMDL at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was awarded the ARCOM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017245

    Original file (20080017245.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 FEBRUARY 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080017245 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and his discharge orders be corrected to reflect his correct Social Security Account Number (SSAN). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing on his DD Form 214 and...