| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Luther L. Santiful | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. Curtis L. Greenway | Member | ||
| Mr. Ronald J. Weaver | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to either an honorable or general discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That he should have gotten a better discharge than he received.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in Nashville, Tennessee, on 24 October 1972, for a period of 3 years and assignment to Fort Campbell, Kentucky. He completed his basic combat training and was transferred to Fort Campbell for his advanced individual training and follow-up assignment. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-2 on 18 February 1973.
On 16 June 1973, he went absent without leave (AWOL) and remained absent until he was apprehended in Winter Haven, Florida, by Federal Bureau of Investigation agents on 17 January 1974. The applicant advised the agents at the time that he would go AWOL again if he was not discharged. He was returned to military control at Fort Gordon, Georgia, where charges were preferred against him for the AWOL offense.
On 25 January 1974, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. In his request he indicated that he was making the request of his own free will, without coercion from anyone and that he was aware of the implications attached to his request. He also acknowledged that he understood that he could receive a discharge under other than honorable conditions and that he might be deprived of all benefits as a result of such a discharge. He further elected to submit a statement in his own behalf whereas he asserted that he did not like the Army, could never be a good soldier and that he knew he would lose all of his benefits with an undesirable discharge and that he still wanted out.
The appropriate authority (a major general) approved his request on 20 February 1974 and directed that he be issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 8 March 1974, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. He had served 9 months and 5 days of total active service and had 220 days of lost time due to AWOL.
There is no indication in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been preferred, submit a voluntary request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must indicate that they have been briefed and understand the consequences of such a request as well as the discharge they might receive. A discharge under other than honorable conditions was at that time and is still normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.
2. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate under the circumstances.
3. After being afforded the opportunity to assert his innocence before a trial by court-martial, he voluntarily requested a discharge for the good of the service in hopes of avoiding a punitive discharge and having a felony conviction on his records. While he may now believe that he made the wrong choice, he should not be allowed to change his mind at this late date, especially considering the length of his absence during a short period of time.
4. The applicant’s contentions have been considered by the Board. However, they are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief when compared to his overall record of undistinguished service.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__ls ____ __gw____ __clg____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003087374 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/08/05 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (UD) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1974/03/08 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200/ch10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Gd of svc |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 689 | 144.7000/a70.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010906
The applicant's DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) shows he was discharged on 29 October 1974 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial, with an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service. The evidence of record shows that the applicant's request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017246C070206
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that Board’s 15-year statute of limitations. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must indicate that they are submitting the request of their own free will, without coercion from anyone and that they have been briefed and understand the consequences of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015193
On 26 March 1974, the applicant requested a discharge for the good of the Service - in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel). The applicant's military service records contain his DD Form 214 that shows he was discharged on 16 April 1974, with an Undesirable Discharge Certificate, with service characterized as under other than honorable conditions, in accordance with the provisions of Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005918C070205
The applicant requests that her undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. There is no evidence in the available records to show that she ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of her discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003758
Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, at the time an undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate. It was not the first time he was AWOL. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003758
Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, at the time an undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate. It was not the first time he was AWOL. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071923C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He again went AWOL from 9 May to 15 May 1974 and from 22 May to 28 June 1974, when he was returned to military control at Fort Hood, Texas, where charges were preferred against him for the AWOL offenses. The facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge are not present in the available records.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072055C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010749
The evidence shows the applicant requested discharge in lieu of facing a court-martial. The characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the evidence shows that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. _______ CHAIRPERSON INDEX CASE ID AR20060010749 SUFFIX RECON DATE BOARDED 2007/02/21 TYPE OF DISCHARGE UD DATE OF DISCHARGE 19750428 DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR635-200,Chapter 10 DISCHARGE REASON In Lieu of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056582C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge.