| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Member | |
| Ms. Gail J. Wire | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That he signed a contract at the time of enlistment to go to Fort Ord, California for basic training, to Hawaii for on the job training and from there he was to be sent to Germany. However, he was sent to Texas instead of Hawaii and he decided to leave the service at that point.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in the Regular Army in Memphis, Tennessee on 27 November 1972 for a period of 4 years, a cash enlistment bonus, basic training at Fort Ord and assignment to the 2d Armored Division. At the time of enlistment he indicated by his signature that no promises other than those made in writing had been made to him.
He completed his basic training at Fort Ord and was transferred to the 2d Armored Division at Fort Hood, Texas on 17 February 1973 to undergo on the job training.
On 12 March 1973 he went absent without leave (AWOL) and remained absent until he was returned to military control on 6 April 1973.
He again went AWOL on 12 April 1973 and remained absent until he was apprehended by Naval Shore Patrol officials (AWOL Apprehension Team) on 7 February 1974. He was found hiding in a closet at the time of his arrest.
He again went AWOL on 12 February 1974 and remained absent until he was arrested by civil authorities for burglary and larceny on 18 March 1974. He was discovered in jail by Shore Patrol officials and was subsequently transferred to Fort Campbell, Kentucky where charges were preferred against him for the three AWOL offenses.
After consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. In his request he indicated that he was making the request of his own free will, without coercion from anyone and that he was aware of the implications attached to his request. He also admitted that he was guilty of the charges against him or of lesser included offenses which authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. He further elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.
On 9 May 1974 the appropriate authority (a brigadier general) approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
Accordingly, the applicant was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 21 May 1974 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. He had served 5 months and 1 day of total active service and had 389 days of lost time due to AWOL.
There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate that they have been briefed and understand the consequences of such a request as well as the discharge they might receive. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.
2. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate under the circumstances.
3. The applicant’s contention that he had an enlistment contract which guaranteed him training in Hawaii and a subsequent assignment to Germany, appears to be without merit and is not supported by the evidence of record. His contract guaranteed him basic training at Fort Ord and assignment to the 2d Armored Division. The applicant was transferred to Fort Hood and assigned to the 2d Armored Division in accordance with the terms of his contract. Accordingly, the terms of his contract were met by the Army. However, the applicant did not fulfill his obligations.
4. After being afforded the opportunity to assert his innocence before a trial by court-martial, he voluntarily requested a discharge for the good of the service in hopes of avoiding a punitive discharge and having a felony conviction on his records. In doing so he admitted guilt to the charges against him. While he may now believe that he made the wrong choice, he should not be allowed to change his mind at this late date, especially considering the extensive period of his absences.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__gw____ ___inw__ ___fe ___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001056582 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2001/08/09 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (UD) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1974/05/21 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200/CH10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | GD OF SVC |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 689 | 144.7000/A70.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011502
The DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) issued to the applicant shows he was discharged on 15 November 1974 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, under separation program designator code KFS (Administrative Discharge Conduct Triable by Court-Martial) with an under other than honorable conditions character of service. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050008638C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 APRIL 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050008638 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Naomi Henderson | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The last group could apply to a Presidential Clemency Board which was made up of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000959
This lawyer was informed that the applicant desired to submit a request for discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of chapter 10 (Discharge in Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial), Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel). On 20 July 1976, the applicant voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 and understood that he could request discharge for the good of the service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012080
However, the available records do contain a duly-constituted DD Form 214 which shows that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial on 14 February 1977. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that boards 15-year statute of limitations. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003055
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). However, his DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 20 August 1974 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 for the good of the service with the issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021319
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. The appropriate authority (a major general) approved his request for discharge on 23 June 1975 and directed his discharge under other than honorable conditions. There is no evidence in the available records to show he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019190
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 29 January 1971, after consulting with defense counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. However, his records contain a duly authenticated DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) which shows that he was discharged...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004107014C070208
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable or a general discharge. It was not until he surrendered to military authorities that he indicated that he went AWOL because he had to take care of his family as a result of his wife deserting him and his children and there is no evidence in the available records that shows that he sought help from his superiors prior to going AWOL.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073397C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. There is no evidence to show that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board to request an upgrade to his discharge within its 15 year statute of limitations. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007707
The applicant requests, in effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 28 June 1974, the applicant voluntarily requested a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations). The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 6 September 1974 under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) with an undesirable...