| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | Analyst |
| Mr. Ted S. Kanamine | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. William D. Powers | Member | ||
| Mr. Frank C. Jones | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Purple Heart (PH).
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he is entitled to the PH based on being wounded in action while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). In support of his application, he provides a copy of the Western Union Telegram that was sent to his father notifying him that the applicant was wounded in action.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he entered the Army on 10 July 1970, and he was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman).
5. The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) confirms that he served in the RVN from 6 December 1970 through 3 December 1971. During his tour in the RVN, he served with D Company, 1st Battalion, 5th Cavalry Regiment, performing duties in MOS 11B as a light weapons infantryman.
6. The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains a copy of General Orders (GO) Number 5652, dated 26 March 1971, issued by Headquarters, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile). These orders awarded the applicant the PH for wounds he received in action while serving as a private first class in the RVN on 15 March 1971. The applicant’s name is also included in the Department of the Army Vietnam Casualty Roster, which confirms he was wounded in action on the date indicated in these orders.
7. On 29 March 1972, the applicant was administratively discharged under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212. The separation document issued to the applicant at the time confirms that he completed a total of 1 year, 8 months, and 10 days of creditable active military service. It also shows that he earned the following awards during his tenure on active duty: National Defense Service Medal; Army Commendation Medal; Combat Infantryman Badge; Vietnam Service Medal; Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal; and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.
8. On 19 April 1978, the Army Discharge Review Board upgraded the applicant’s discharge to fully honorable under uniform Department of Defense (DOD) standards under the provisions of the Special Discharge Review Program. The DD Form 214 issued at this time listed the same earned awards that were contained in the applicant’s original DD Form 214.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. Paragraph 2-8 contains the regulatory guidance pertaining to awarding the PH. It states, in pertinent part, that in order to award a PH there must be evidence that a member was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action. The wound or injury for which the PH is being awarded must have required treatment by a medical officer, this treatment must be supported by medical treatment records that were made a matter of official record.
10. Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on the Vietnam, Service Medal. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN.
11. Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) establishes the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. It confirms that based on his tenure of assignment in the RVN, the applicant was credited with participating in the Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VII and Consolidation I campaigns, and his unit earned the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board notes the applicant claim of entitlement to the PH, and it finds this claim has merit. The evidence of record confirms that as a result of being wounded in action while serving in the RVN on 15 March 1971, the applicant was awarded the PH in GO Number 5652, dated 26 March 1971, issued by Headquarters, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile). Thus, the Board finds it would appropriate to add this award to his record at this time.
2. During the review of this case, the Board also discovered that based on his campaign participation and unit service in the RVN, the applicant is entitled to 2 bronze service stars with his Vietnam Service Medal and to the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. Thus, the Board concludes that it would also be appropriate to add these awards to his records at this time.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by adding the earned Purple Heart of the individual concerned to his record; by showing he is entitled to 2 bronze service stars with his Vietnam Service Medal and to the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; and by providing him a corrected separation document that includes these awards.
BOARD VOTE:
TK__ _WDP___ __FCJ __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Ted S. Kanamine
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2003087225 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/08DD |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | HD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1972/03/29 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-212 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Unfitness |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 61 | 107.0015 |
| 2. 46 | 107.0000 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087345C070212
The applicant states, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) does not include the PH that he received for being wounded in action on 23 November 1967, while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), or the CIB he was entitled to based on his service with an infantry unit. However, although the record confirms he served in and participated in combat action in the RVN with a qualifying infantry unit, it also verifies that while serving in this unit, he was assigned duties in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087220C070212
The applicant states, in effect, that his unit commander recommended he be awarded the PH and BSM with “V” Device. The PH and BSM with “V” Device are not included in this list of awards. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that he is entitled to three bronze service stars with his Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation and the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050012592
The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 8 January 1971 through 19 December 1971. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence that wound for which the award is being was received as a direct result of, or was caused by enemy action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the first award of the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080889C070215
The applicant states, in effect, that he was awarded the PH and it was not included in his separation document (DD Form 214). Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on awarding the Vietnam Service Medal and it states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he is entitled to receive the PH for wounds he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012968
The applicant requests, in effect, correction to Item 3 (Social Security Number), Item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank), Item 5c (Pay Grade), and Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his 17 June 1971 separation document (DD Form 214). The evidence of record further confirms that based on his RVN service and campaign participation, the applicant is also entitled to the Valorous Unit Award, RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061857C070421
The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no derogatory information that would have disqualified him from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal and there is no evidence that he was ever disqualified from receiving the award by any of the unit commanders for which he served. Paragraph 2-13 of Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides guidance on awarding the Vietnam Service Medal and it states, in pertinent part, that one bronze service star is authorized with this award for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089433C070403
There are no medical treatment records on file and the applicant has failed to provide any evidence to show he was ever treated for a lower back injury while serving in the RVN, or that he was ever wounded or injured in action. The evidence of record shows that at the latest, the applicant should have discovered the PH error or injustice now under consideration on the date of his separation, 9 April 1971; therefore, the time for him to file a request for correction of his record regarding...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087327C070212
Therefore, the Board concludes it would be appropriate to award the applicant the PH at this time. Lacking any derogatory information on file and/or a specific disqualifying action from any of his active duty unit commanders, which would preclude him from receiving the AGCM, the Board concludes that the applicant served a qualifying period of service that entitles him to receive the first award of the AGCM. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007943
Item 31 (Foreign Service) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 11 February 1968 through 9 February 1969; and again from 5 October 1970 through 4 October 1971. Therefore, it would also be appropriate to add these awards to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 24 of his 4 October 1971 DD Form 214 by adding the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010567C071029
The applicant states, in effect, he received a PH for being wounded in action in January 1968, which is included in his record and on his separation document (DD Form 214), but did not receive a second PH for an incident that occurred on 19 September 1967, when he was flying a helicopter gunship in the An Loc valley in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). By regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a...