| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Ted S. Kanamine | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Purple Heart (PH).
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was shot and wounded from friendly fire when he was mistaken for the enemy. He claims that this injury he received in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) should entitle him to receive the PH. In support of his application, he submits a copy of United States Army Vietnam (USARV) Form 130-R (USARV Casualty Report).
4. The applicant’s military records show that he entered the Army on 26 June 1967. His was trained and served in military occupational specialty (MOS)
11B (Infantryman) and the awards he earned during his active duty tenure include: Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 60 Device; Vietnam Service Medal; Army Commendation Medal; Bronze Star Medal; Air Medal; National Defense Service Medal; and Combat Infantryman Badge. On 25 June 1970, he was honorably separated, in the rank of specialist/E-4, after completing a total of 3 years of active military service.
5. The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) verifies that the applicant served in C Company (Ranger), 75th Infantry Regiment, RVN, as an infantryman, from 14 February 1969 to 22 January 1970. It also confirms in item 40 (Wounds) that he received a gunshot wound to the abdomen and neck (multi small holes, extensive high velocity injury to abdominal wall) on 18 November 1969.
6. The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no derogatory information that would have disqualified him from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal and there is no evidence that he was ever disqualified from receiving the award by any of the unit commanders for which he served.
7. A USARV Form 130-R on file confirms that on 18 November 1969, while on security guard for radio relay, the applicant was mistakenly shot while trying to verify enemy movement he heard and was treated for this wound at the
24th Evacuation Hospital.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 prescribes the policy for the Army awards program. Paragraph 2-8 contains the policy for awarding the PH and it states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. Paragraph 2-8b(6) states, in pertinent part, that individuals wounded or killed as a result of friendly fire in the heat of battle will be awarded the PH as long as the friendly projectile or agent was released with the full intent of inflicting damage or destroying enemy troops or equipment.
9. Paragraph 2-13 of Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides guidance on awarding the Vietnam Service Medal and it states, in pertinent part, that one bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member participated in while serving in the RVN.
10. Chapter 4 of the awards regulation provides guidance on awarding the AGCM and it states, in pertinent part, that it is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. It also specifies that each 3 years served on active duty is a qualifying period for the award if a member is otherwise qualified and further that any disqualification must be justified.
11. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam. This document shows the unit to which the applicant was assigned received the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation as authorized by Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) Number 8, issued in 1974; and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal Unit Citation, authorized in DAGO Number 42, issued in 1972.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was wounded by friendly fire while serving in the RVN on 18 November 1969, when he was mistaken for the enemy while trying to verify enemy movement. He was treated for this wound at the 24th Evacuation Hospital and this treatment was confirmed in a USARV casualty report and his DA Form 20. Therefore, the Board concludes he meets the regulatory criteria necessary to be awarded the PH and it finds it would be appropriate to add this award to his record at this time.
2. In addition, the record verifies that the applicant served a qualifying period of service that entitles him to receive the AGCM. Therefore, given there is no derogatory information on file that would disqualify him from receiving this award, and lacking a formal disqualification by any of his unit commanders, the Board concludes it would be appropriate to add the AGCM to his record at this time.
3. The record also confirms that based on his unit service in the RVN, the applicant is entitled to the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal Unit Citation; and 3 bronze service stars with his Vietnam Service Medal as a result of his campaign participation. Thus, the Board finds these awards should also be added to his record at this time.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. awarding him the Purple Heart based on his having been wounded in action on 18 November 1969, while serving as a specialist four/E-4 in the RVN;
b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his 3 year period of honorable active military service from 26 June 1967 to 25 June 1970; and
c. by showing that based on his unit service in the RVN he earned the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal Unit Citation, and 3 bronze service stars for his Vietnam Service Medal as a result of his campaign participation.
BOARD VOTE:
__FNE __ _ _TSK __ __JTM GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__Fred N. Eichorn__
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001061857 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/01/10 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002652
The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents that show the applicant was ever awarded, held, or served in an infantry MOS, or that he was awarded the CIB or AM by proper authority while serving in the RVN. The evidence of record also fails to show that the applicant served as a crewmember or non-crewmember on flight status during his tenure of assignment in the RVN, or that he completed the number of air missions necessary to qualify for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010567C071029
The applicant states, in effect, he received a PH for being wounded in action in January 1968, which is included in his record and on his separation document (DD Form 214), but did not receive a second PH for an incident that occurred on 19 September 1967, when he was flying a helicopter gunship in the An Loc valley in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). By regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071119C070402
The Board considered the following evidence: The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or documents indicating that while he was serving in the RVN, the applicant was ever wounded as a result of enemy action or as the result of friendly fire, or that he was recommended for or awarded a PH. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant served a qualifying period of honorable service, from 17 January 1966 through 26 November 1967, that entitles him to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017852
CIB orders are on file in the applicant's record and therefore the CIB should be added to his DD Form 214. The applicant's record is void of AM orders or other documentation indicating it was ever recommended or awarded; however, by regulation, eligibility for the AM is established for members whose combat duties require them to fly, which includes those in the attack elements of units involved in air-land assaults against an armed enemy and those directly involved in airborne command and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085193C070212
The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was wounded in action by friendly fire on 12 August 1969, while serving on green line duty (inside perimeter) in the RVN during an enemy penetration. Therefore, the Board concludes that the applicant is entitled to the PH and that it would be appropriate to award it to him and add it to his record at this time. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Purple...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014418
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). By regulation, in order to support award of the PH, it is necessary to establish that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that it required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001805
The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 13 June 1968. Thus, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the PH for wounds received in action in the RVN on 20 May 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the: * Bronze Star Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars b. awarding him the Purple Heart for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005845
The applicant requests that the Purple Heart (PH), Air Medal (AM), Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, and all other awards to which he is entitled be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). There is no evidence that the applicant was awarded the AM; therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his record to show this...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089037C070403
These orders awarded the applicant the PH for wounds he received in action while serving as a SP4 in the RVN on 20 March 1967. Lacking any derogatory information on file that would disqualify him from receiving the AGCM, or a specific disqualification from any of the active duty unit commanders for whom he served, the Board finds that he is entitled to the first award of the AGCM based on his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 20 April 1966 through 19 April 1969. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084368C070212
The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents showing that he was ever wounded or injured in action, or that he was ever recommended for the PH. In order to support an award of the PH, the wound or injury for which it is being awarded must have been incurred as a result of enemy action. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the first award of the Army Good...