Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084290C070212
Original file (2003084290C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF
        

         BOARD DATE: 22 January 2004
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003084290

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Joseph A. Adriance Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Joann H. Langston Chairperson
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Member
Mr. Ronald J. Weaver Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be granted one year of Reserve service credit for the period 13 December 1982 through 13 December 1983.

3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was unaware that he was not given service credit for the period between 13 December 1982 and 31 July 1983 and that this period did not count toward retirement until December 2002. He states that in March 1983, he was advised by his local personnel officer that he would have to submit an unqualified resignation in order to leave active duty and keep his commission in order to join the Reserve. He states that it was never his intent to completely sever his association with the Army. He also states that on
1 August 1983, he began drilling with a Troop Program Unit (TPU) of the United States Army Reserve (USAR) under the assumption that he retained his commission and was a member of the USAR in good standing.

4. The applicant further states that in July 1983, he met with the commander of a TPU battalion to discuss becoming a member of that command. He claims that during this period, a soldier leaving active duty had to find his own position in the USAR. The commander accepted him into his unit as a company commander and the battalion administrative section was directed to submit the required paperwork to the Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) in order to consummate this assignment. The applicant further states that he began drilling with the unit in August 1983 and he continued to drill through April 1984. He also states that he never missed a monthly drill and never received pay. He also claims that when he signed in for each drill, he questioned the chain of command about his status and he was simply told that it took a long time to get orders in the Reserve. He states that the only reason he stopped drilling was that the unit departed for active duty training in the summer of 1984.

5. In support of his application, the applicant provides two statements from noncommissioned officers (NCO) that confirm that at the time he was released from active duty (REFRAD), the local personnel officer advised the applicant to tender his unqualified resignation, which would allow him to retain his Reserve commission.

6. The applicant’s military records show that he was commissioned a second lieutenant in the USAR and entered active duty in that status on 17 June 1975. He served on active duty for 8 years, 1 month, and 14 days until being honorably discharged on 31 July 1983.


7. On 16 March 1983, the applicant tendered his unqualified resignation. He stated that the purpose for his resignation was his desire to pursue opportunities as an intelligence analyst in the civilian community. Orders Number 73-1, dated 24 May 1983, authorized the applicant’s discharge on 31 July 1983. The separation document issued to the applicant at the time confirms that he was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-120, for miscellaneous reasons.

8. On 3 February 1984, the applicant submitted a request for assistance to the ARPERSCOM. In this request, he outlined his situation and in effect asked that his discharge be revoked and that he be allowed to retain his Reserve commission and to continue to serve with his TPU, where he had been serving since his REFRAD.

9. A letter from the applicant’s TPU battalion commander, dated 3 March 1984, confirms that the applicant had served honorably as a company commander in his battalion from the date of his REFRAD on 31 July 1983. This battalion commander confirmed that he had recently learned that as a result of an administrative error, the applicant’s Reserve status was terminated upon his discharge from active duty. The battalion commander stated that this was unfortunate for the applicant as well as the Reserve program because he had been an invaluable asset to the unit. The battalion commander requested orders assigning the applicant as a company commander with an effective date of
1 August 1983. The battalion commander enclosed the applicant’s 3 February 1984 request packet with his letter.

10. On 30 March 1984, the Chief, Military Intelligence (MI) Branch, ARPERSCOM responded to the applicant’s request. He informed the applicant that it was the unanimous opinion of officers in a position to evaluate his situation that on the face of the available documentation, the applicant had resigned his commission on 31 July 1983, and he agreed with that assessment. The MI branch chief further stated that while it was clear it was not the applicant’s intent to resign his commission, as evidenced by his joining TPU believing his commission in the USAR was still active, in point of fact his 31 July 1983 discharge was valid. The MI branch chief recommended that the applicant consider pursuing one of two possible actions. The first was to appeal to this Board, and the second was to submit an appointment package through the chain of command requesting reappointment.

11. A Reserve Personnel Accounting System (RPAS) statement on file pertaining to the applicant confirms that between 13 December 1974 and
27 August 1997, he accrued a total of 4081 points and 19 years of creditable service for Reserve retirement purposes.

12. In connection with the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from human resource (HR) officials of the 88th Regional Support Team, ARPERSCOM. It recommends that the applicant’s 31 July 1983 discharge be revoked and that his records be corrected to show he was transferred to the USAR upon his release from active duty (REFRAD) on that date.

13. The ARPERSCOM advisory opinion also contains a recommendation that the applicant be credited with 1 good year of creditable service for Reserve retirement purposes for the period 13 December 1982 through 12 December 1983. Further, that he receive membership points for the period 13 December 1983 through 12 December 1984 and 13 December 1984 through 13 March 1985. Finally, it states that the applicant should receive all points he accumulated during drills with the TPU he served with between August 1983 and April 1984. On 12 June 2003, the applicant concurred with this advisory opinion.

14. Army Regulation 635-120, in effect at the time, provided the policy for the separation of USAR officers from active duty. It provided provisions for both unqualified resignation for miscellaneous reasons, which resulted in discharge; and for voluntary separation that allowed officers to retain their USAR commission and to continue to serve in the USAR.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he submitted his unqualified resignation based on the advise of a personnel officer at the time and that it was never his intent to sever all ties with the Army. It also notes his claim that he was unaware that his service in a TPU subsequent to his discharge was not counted as creditable service for Reserve retirement purposes, and it finds these contentions have merit.

2. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was discharged from the Army on 31 July 1983, based on his unqualified resignation request. It also confirms that subsequent to his discharge, he actively drilled with a TPU in good faith between August 1983 and April 1984.

3. In the opinion of the Board, the statements from personnel NCOs provided by the applicant confirm that he submitted his unqualified resignation on the advise of the local personnel officer. Further, as evidenced by his joining a TPU and his active participation in the USAR, the applicant clearly did not believe that his resignation and discharge resulted in his losing his USAR commission.

4. In view of the facts of this case, the Board concurs with the service credit recommendations contained in the ARPERSCOM advisory opinion and it finds that it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records accordingly.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by:

a. revoking the 31 July 1983 discharge of the individual concerned and showing that he instead was released from active duty and transferred to the
1st Battalion, 330th Regiment, 1st Brigade, 70th Infantry Division (Training), USAR, Livonia, Michigan on that same date.

b. showing that he retained his commission in the USAR and had no break in service between 1 August 1983 and 13 March 1985, and by crediting him with all points and qualifying service he earned for his TPU service during this period; and

c. crediting him with 1 qualifying year of service for the period
13 December 1982 through 12 December 1983, and granting him membership points for the period 13 December 1984 through 13 March 1985.

2. That once all service credit adjustments have been made, the responsible Army Reserve personnel officials notify the applicant on whether or not he is eligible to receive retired pay at age 60 and if so, of the application procedures required for him to apply for and receive non-regular retired pay.

BOARD VOTE:

_JHL___ __AO__ ___RJW___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  Joann H. Langston
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003084290
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2003/10/22
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 1983/07/31
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-120
DISCHARGE REASON Unqualified Resignation
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 303 129.0100
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015411

    Original file (20100015411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following documentary evidence: * self-authored promotion date comparison sheet, dated 21 May 2010 * DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Records), dated 9 June 1988 * DA Form 268 (Report for Suspension of Favorable Personnel Actions), dated 17 February 1988 * memorandum, dated 5 February 1988, subject: Involuntary Separation Action * memorandum for record, dated 10 June 1988, concerning an appeal of his Officer Evaluation Report (OER) * Orders 6-3,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016328C071029

    Original file (20060016328C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a 15 October 1984 letter from the State of California, Office of the Adjutant General to the Commander, 1/143d FA, the unit was informed that a Reserve CPT promotion board would convene on 8 January 1985 and that documents for officers listed on an attached enclosure had not been received. The applicant states that around November 1986 he resigned his Army commission from the USAR. Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091194C070212

    Original file (2003091194C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel records were not available to the Board. The ARPERSCOM advisory opinion points out that the applicant requested retirement point credit service performed between the effective date of his transfer to the Retired Reserve, 9 October 1996, and the date when his official orders transferring him to the Retired Reserve were actually published, 29 August 1997. At this time, the applicant was given the option of accepting separation pay or changing the effective...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002918

    Original file (20090002918.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that: a. he be awarded credit for qualifying years of service for non-regular retirement as a reinstated officer from the date of his voided discharge to the date of his return to the active Reserve (5 May 2005); and b. his discharge orders, Orders Number D-08-852440, dated 13 August 1998, be revoked and removed from his official records. The applicant's official records do not contain a copy of his honorable discharge orders (D-08-852440) from the USAR, dated 13...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087155C070212

    Original file (2003087155C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her application, she provides letters from members of the chain of command that confirm she served and performed drills with a TPU during the period January through May 2002. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was properly appointed in the USAR on 27 November 2001 and that she was an active member of a TPU between 27 November 2001 and 10 June 2002, and that she attended all required drills and annual training during this period. c. showing that she was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010331

    Original file (20070010331.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following additional documentary evidence in support of her application: a. DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 31 December 1992. b. U.S. Total Army Personnel Command (now known as HRC), St. Louis, Missouri, Memorandum, dated 31 December 1992, appointing her as a Reserve commissioned officer. e. Page 1 of Standard Form 93 (Report of Medical History), dated 26 October 2000. f. Headquarters, 75th Division (Training Support),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052119C070420

    Original file (2001052119C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Following the non-selection for promotion, the applicant requested that this Board correct his records to reflect that the period he was in a questionable status not be considered toward his mandatory promotion date. Records of the ARNG show the applicant’s periods of service as 6 June 1979 to 15 February 1985 - Regular Army (RA), 16 February 1985 to 31 December 1998 - Army Reserve (USAR) and 1 January 1999 to the present - NYARNG. Section 2-2, Inactive and active status, states that an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018263

    Original file (20110018263.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel states: * Applicant informed his unit that he wanted to transfer to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) but despite not having any further military obligations, his unit refused or failed to process his request for over a year * By regulation, he had no military service obligation; therefore, he was entitled to a transfer to the IRR without any justification * His chain of command appears to have been disappointed with his request for a transfer to the IRR and demanded that he remain...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103324C070208

    Original file (2004103324C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Ronald J. Weaver | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant’s service as an ROTC cadet was not performed while he was in a concurrent drilling status in the USAR. Therefore, this service is not creditable service for PEBD purposes and there is insufficient evidence to support granting the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071739C070403

    Original file (2002071739C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The WOMT denied this request because the RDMS indicated that the applicant was assigned to the Retired Reserve as a LTC. In its earlier consideration of this case, the Board concluded that due to numerous errors in dates in the appointment process and transfers among the RC between June 1996 and February 1999, the applicant was effectively prevented from completing his RC warrant officer training requirements within the prescribed period, which by regulation was three years. The Board in...