| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy L. Amos | Analyst |
| Ms. Kathleen A. Newman | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) election to former spouse coverage and that she be provided a military identification card.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that she was married to the FSM from 1957 until 1990. She feels she met the 20/20/20 rule. She was not aware of possible benefits until the FSM died.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The FSM's military records show:
He initially enlisted in the Army National Guard in March 1957. He and the applicant married on 15 September 1957. He had a break in service from March 1968 until October 1971. He reenlisted in the Army National Guard on 26 October 1971.
The FSM's notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) is dated 29 March 1983. On 5 May 1983, the FSM completed a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) and elected to participate in the RCSBP for spouse and children coverage, full base amount, option C.
On 17 August 1990, the FSM and the applicant divorced. The divorce decree does not mention the RCSBP.
The FSM remarried on an unknown date. He died on 8 September 2002.
Records at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service – Cleveland Center indicate the RCSBP annuity is being paid to a surviving dependent.
Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60.
Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.
Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members (Reservists, too).
Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.
Army Regulation 600-8-14 (Identification Cards, Tags, and Badges) states that there are several categories of Unremarried Former Spouse (URFS) which are authorized benefits and privileges under the USFSPA to include URFS/02 (20/20/20). URFS/02 pertains to URFS if the marriage and service overlapped by at least 20 years. Full privileges (commissary, exchange, theater, and medical care (only if former spouse certifies in writing that he or she has no medical coverage under an employer-sponsored health plan and if not entitled to Medicare Part A hospital insurance through the Social Security Administration)) are authorized, regardless of the date of divorce. All benefits are terminated upon the former spouse's remarriage. All benefits except medical are reinstated if the remarriage ends in death or divorce.
Army Regulation 600-8-14 further states that the former spouse may apply at an Army installation identification card issuing facility. The following must be furnished when applying for a former spouse identification card: (1) the member's full name and social security number; (2) the member's status. A statement of service is required; (3) marriage certificate; (4) final decree of divorce or dissolution of marriage; (5) a statement certifying that the former spouse is not enrolled in an employer-sponsored health care plan; and (6) a statement by the former spouse certifying marital status. Assistance can be obtained from the servicing Army installation identification card issuing facility.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board acknowledges that the applicant was married to the FSM for the majority of his military service and that the FSM had elected spouse and child RCSBP coverage in May 1983.
2. RCSBP elections are made by category, not by name. When the FSM and the applicant divorced, the applicant was no longer an eligible spouse beneficiary and unfortunately the divorce decree did not award her the RCSBP. At the present time, an eligible beneficiary is receiving the RCSBP annuity.
3. It appears the applicant is entitled to a military identification card. However, she must follow the guidance in Army Regulation 600-8-14 as outlined above to apply for the card and related benefits.
4. Regrettably, in view of the foregoing there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__kan___ __le____ __jtm___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003086549 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20031002 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | Mr. Chun |
| ISSUES 1. | 137.04 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014433
The FSM and the applicant were divorced on 28 November 2001. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the members agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The FSM and applicant were divorced on 28 November 2001.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054942C070420
Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members (Reservists, too). Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The evidence of record shows that the applicant did not request termination of his SBP spouse coverage after his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060422C070421
In 1989, the FSM and the applicant divorced. The Board concludes that it would be appropriate to correct his records to show that he elected former spouse coverage on 1 January 1990, within one year of his divorce. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the FSM changed his SBP election from spouse to former spouse coverage on 1 January 1990 and that his request was received and processed by the appropriate office in a timely manner.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076503C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. If the member was married but elected not to participate at the maximum level or elected to provide an annuity for a dependent child but not for his spouse, that member’s spouse would be notified of that election. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008544C070205
David Tucker | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The military records at DFAS verify that the FSM’s widow, T______, is receiving the SBP annuity.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013072
At the time, a member must have made the election within 90 days of receiving the notification of eligibility to receive retired pay at age 60 or else wait until he/she applies for retired pay and elect to participate in the standard SBP. At the time of the FSM's and the applicant's divorce, the USFSPA had not been enacted into law and the divorce degree provided by the applicant makes no mention of any provisions directing that the FSM provide SBP benefits to his former spouse (the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063604C070421
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage from spouse to former spouse. The FSM and the applicant divorced on 9 February 1999. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003015
In a 15 July 2002 letter, the applicant's attorney indicated she mailed documents (e.g., certified copy of the final decree of divorce, letter from the applicant, and agreement to name the applicant former spouse beneficiary under the SBP) to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) in Denver, CO, with a return receipt request (7109 2817 3080 0000 0491). f. the necessary documentation was sent to DFAS in a timely manner along with the agreement between the spouses and a certified...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020974
Counsel requests, in effect, that the records of the FSM be corrected to show: * the applicant is entitled to Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) benefits * the applicant is eligible to receive 20 percent of the FSM's retired pay 2. The divorce decree indicated that the applicant was to receive 20 percent of the FSM's retired pay. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003194
On 28 October 2008, he made a spouse and children full coverage election with immediate coverage (option C) under the RCSBP. Public Law 99-661, enacted 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the members agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Accordingly, since the FSM elected spouse and child immediate full coverage and since he no longer had a spouse, his...