Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008544C070205
Original file (20060008544C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        18 January 2007
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060008544


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Beverly A. Young              |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Jeffrey Redmann               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Rodney Barber                 |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. David Tucker                  |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that she be paid the Reserve
Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) annuity based on the enrollment of
her deceased [former] spouse, a former service member (FSM), in the RCSBP.

2.  The applicant states that she should be entitled to her late [former]
husband’s military retirement because she was married to him for 21 years.
She states that the woman, who is now receiving his retirement, divorced
him and was only [re]married to him for a year.  She also states she and
the FSM had two sons, one adopted and one by birth.  She further states
that she is sick, is unable to work, and only has disability income.

3.  The applicant provides photographs of the FSM’s headstone; a
supplemental letter; her marriage license; two blood tests; her Application
for Marriage License; her final divorce decree, dated 4 February 1991; a
partial Separation Agreement; three birth certificates; an adoption decree,
dated 16 October 1971; a final divorce decree, dated 2 February 1994;
Application for Marriage License and marriage license for the FSM and his
last spouse; a letter from his last spouse, dated 30 September 2004; and
the FSM’s death certificate.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM was born on 7 April 1945.  He married and divorced a first
spouse. He and the applicant were married on 11 August 1970.

2.  After having had prior service in the Army National Guard and the
Regular Army, the FSM enlisted in the Army National Guard again on 6 June
1984.  He was discharged on 1 May 1989 and was transferred to the U.S. Army
Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) on the following date.

3.  The FSM's notification of eligibility to receive retired pay at age 60
(20-Year Letter) is not available.  Information obtained from the Defense
Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) revealed that the FSM completed a DD
Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) and enrolled in the
RCSBP for spouse only coverage, full base amount, apparently option C.

4.  The FSM and the applicant entered into a Separation Agreement on
28 January 1991.  The applicant provided only the first page of the
Separation Agreement; therefore, it cannot be determined whether RCSBP
coverage was mentioned.


5.  The FSM and the applicant were divorced on 4 February 1991.  The
divorce decree does not mention the RCSBP.

6.  The FSM enlisted in the Army National Guard on 4 June 1991.  He married
T________ on an unknown date and divorced T______ on 2 February 1994.

7.  The FSM was discharged from the Army National Guard and he was assigned
to the Retired Reserve on 1 January 2001.

8.  He remarried T_______ on 24 April 2001.

9.  The FSM died on 19 July 2003.  His death certificate shows he was
married to T______ at the time of his death.

10.  In a 23 March 2005 memorandum from the Transition and Separations
Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, Missouri, the FSM’s
surviving spouse, T______, was certified for the SBP annuity.

11.  Information obtained from DFAS in Cleveland, Ohio, on 4 January 2007
revealed that the FSM's widow, T_____, is receiving the SBP annuity.

12.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that
military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide
for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  Elections are made by
category, not by name.

13.  Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a
way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age
60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before
reaching age 60. Three options are available:  (A) elect to decline
enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B)
elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but
delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect
that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if
before age 60.

14.  Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection
Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former
spouses of retiring members.

15.  Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse
coverage for retired members (Reservists, too).

16.  Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to
order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where
the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had
not yet made an SBP election.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The FSM received his 20-Year Letter on an unknown date.  It appears he
was married to the applicant at that time and elected RCSBP coverage for
spouse, full base amount, option C.

2.  The FSM and the applicant were divorced on 4 February 1991.

3.  The FSM married T______ and divorced her on 2 February 1994.  He
remarried T_______ on 24 April 2001.  After their first anniversary (of the
remarriage), T_______ became the legal beneficiary of the SBP.

4.  The FSM died on 19 July 2003.  At that time, he was married to,
T________, who is now his widow.

6.  The military records at DFAS verify that the FSM’s widow, T______, is
receiving the SBP annuity.  Based on the available evidence, the property
interest of the SBP annuity vested in her after 24 April 2002.  Even if the
applicant’s divorce court awarded her the SBP annuity in 1991 (unknown at
this time), this property interest cannot be taken away from T______
without due process of law.  Therefore, it would be inequitable to grant
the applicant’s request at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

JR______  RB______  DT______  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.




                                  Jeffrey Redmann_______
                                            CHAIRPERSON

                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060008544                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20070118                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Chun                                |
|ISSUES         1.       |137.0000                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014433

    Original file (20080014433.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM and the applicant were divorced on 28 November 2001. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The FSM and applicant were divorced on 28 November 2001.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004491

    Original file (20140004491.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests in effect correction of her former husband's record to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for former spouse, and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The FSM and applicant were divorced on 26 September 2012. Unfortunately, there is no evidence the FSM changed his SBP coverage to "former spouse" coverage or the applicant deemed the election within one year of her divorce.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016263C071029

    Original file (20060016263C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides their divorce decree; the FSM’s DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate); the FSM’s DD Form 2656, and the FSM’s obituary. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Notwithstanding his widow informing the Board analyst that she was actively...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011783

    Original file (20100011783 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests entitlement to SBP benefits. The evidence of record shows subsequent to receiving his 20-year letter the FSM elected spouse RCSBP coverage based on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100067C070208

    Original file (2004100067C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It further provides that a surviving spouse eligible to receive RCSBP payments is the widow or widower who is married to the service member at the time of the member's death and who was married to the member at the time of his or her SBP election, was married to the FSM for at least 1 year prior to the death of the FSM or is the parent of a child born to a post- election marriage to the deceased member. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004456

    Original file (20110004456.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted a new argument which was not previously reviewed by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR); therefore, it is considered new evidence and as such warrants consideration by the Board. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. However, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016430

    Original file (20120016430.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a letter from the USAR Personnel Command, dated 13 December 2004, that states: a. there is no provision in the law governing the SBP whereby a divorced spouse may be granted a survivor benefit annuity. Their records indicate the applicant was divorced on 22 November 1999 and the divorce decree clearly states the FSM was to provide her one half of his military retired pay. Public Law 95-397, the Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP), enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015148

    Original file (20060015148.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM was discharged from the Army National Guard on 5 October 1995 and was assigned to the Retired Reserve. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. The FSM and the applicant were married in December 1971 and divorced on an unknown date.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000571

    Original file (20130000571.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel requests the records of the applicant's deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" within 1 year of his divorce and the SBP annuity be paid to her. The Board previously twice denied the applicant's request because the FSM did not change his SBP election from "spouse" to "former spouse" and the applicant did not deem the election within one year of her divorce. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018472

    Original file (20110018472.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests correction of the FSM's records to show he changed his SBP election from spouse to former spouse coverage. However, DFAS was unable to release any detailed information pertaining to the FSM's retired pay account due to the Privacy Act of 1974. l. ABCMR Docket Number AR2003083486, dated 27 March 2003, corrected the military records of a FSM to show that the FSM requested to change his SBP coverage to former spouse and children coverage and that his request was received and...