RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 30 June 2005
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040008696
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Ms. Melinda M. Darby | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Thomas E. O’Shaughessy | |Member |
| |Ms. Yolanda Maldonado | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart (PH).
2. The applicant states, in effect, that he would like the PH he received
for being wounded in action on 2 February 1944.
3. The applicant provides the following documents in support of his
application: Self-Authored Statement, Separation Document (WD AGO Form 53-
55), and
The Adjutant General (TAG) of the Army Notification Letters.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of alleged error or injustice
that occurred on 11 January 1946. The application submitted in this case
is dated
28 September 2004.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for
review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records
at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in 1973. It is believed
that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire. However,
there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the
Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case. This case is
being considered using reconstructed records, that primarily consist of the
applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55, TAG PH Notification Letters, and Office of
the Surgeon General (OTSG) Hospital Admission Cards for 1942-1945.
4. The applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he was inducted into the Army
and entered active duty on 12 April 1943. He held the military
occupational specialty (MOS) 405 (Clerk Typist) and served in the European
Theater of Operations (ETO) from 24 November 1943 through 23 July 1944. It
further shows that he participated in the Sicily, Naples-Foggia and Rome-
Arno campaigns of World War II.
5. The applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55 also shows, in Item 33 (Decorations
and Citations), that during his tenure on active duty, he earned the
American Theater Campaign Medal, European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign
Medal with 3 bronze service stars, Army Good Conduct Medal and World War II
Victory Medal. Item 34 (Wounds Received in Action) contains the entry “Not
Available”.
6. An OTSG Hospital Admission Record for the applicant, which is on file
at the NPRC, confirms he was admitted to a medical facility in the ETO in
February 1944, and that he was treated for a combat related shell fragment
wound. The OTSG record further confirms the applicant was categorized as a
battle casualty.
7. The applicant provides two TAG notification letters addressed to the
applicant’s mother, dated 21 March and 26 April 1944, respectively. These
letters notified the applicant’s mother that the applicant was convalescing
and making normal improvement. A TAG letter, dated 14 February 1946, was
also provided by the applicant. This letter informs the applicant he was
awarded the PH for wounds he received in action on 2 February 1944, and
that the PH medal would be provided to him within a short period.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and
criteria concerning individual military awards. Paragraph 2-8 contains the
regulatory guidance pertaining to awarding the PH. It states, in pertinent
part, that the PH is awarded to any member of an Armed Force who, while
serving in any capacity with one of the Armed Services after 5 April 1917,
has been wounded or killed in action. The regulation defines a wound as an
injury to any part of the body from an outside force or agent sustained
under conditions defined by this regulation. In order to support awarding
a member the PH, it is necessary to establish that the wound, for which the
award is being made, required treatment by a medical officer. This
treatment must be supported by records of medical treatment for the wound
or injury received in action, and must have been made a matter of official
record.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s claim of entitlement to the PH based on being wounded
in action during World War II was carefully considered and found to have
merit. By regulation, in order to support awarding a member the PH, it is
necessary to establish that the member was wounded in action, treated for
the wound received in action and the record of this treatment must have
been made a matter of official record.
2. The OTSG Hospital Admission Record and TAG notification letters confirm
the applicant was wounded in action on 2 February 1944, while serving in
the ETO during World War II. The OTSG record also shows he was treated for
this combat related shell fragment wound at a military medical facility as
a battle casualty. Therefore, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to
support award of the PH has been satisfied in this case. As a result, it
would be appropriate to add this award to his record at this time.
BOARD VOTE:
___MMD_ ___TEO_ __YM___ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a
result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the
individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart; and by
providing him a corrected separation document that adds the PH to the list
of awards contained in Item 33, and by adding the entry “Shell Fragment
Wound, 2 February 1944, ETO” to Item 34.
____Melinda M. Darby____
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20040008696 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |2005/06/30 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |HD |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |1946/01/11 |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR 615-365 |
|DISCHARGE REASON |Demobilization |
|BOARD DECISION |GRANT |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY |Mr. Schneider |
|ISSUES 1. 61 |107.0061 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056045C070420
The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. By regulation, in order to support awarding a member the PH, it is necessary to establish that the wound for which the award is being made required treatment by a medical officer. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the PH for a wound he received in action, on 10 October 1944, while serving as a PFC, in the ETO during World War II;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012076
The applicant requests in effect, that the records of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) for valor, the Silver Star (SS), Purple Heart (PH) with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award), and Glider Infantry Badge; to show his eligibility for the French Fourragere, Belgian Fourragere, Netherlands Order of William, Belgium Order of the Day, and Netherlands Orange Lanyard; and that he be issued award certificates for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004403C071029
Donald L. Lewy | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There are no orders or other documents in the applicant's reconstructed NPRC file that show he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority, or that he was ever treated for a combat related wound by military medical personnel while he was serving on active duty. Absent any evidence confirming that the applicant was wounded as a result of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010924
The applicant states that she hopes there is a record of the FSM being awarded the SS because he did earn it and receive it. Given hospital commanders had the authority to award the PH for wounds received in action, this also could possibly be the award the applicant believes the FSM was awarded and for which he received a certificate while in the hospital. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting...
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050011815
John M. Moeller | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. This case is being considered using reconstructed records, which primarily consist of the applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55 and an OTSG Hospital Admission Record for 1944. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence showing the wound for which the award is being made was received as a direct result of, or caused by enemy action,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001190
The applicant requests, in effect, that his record and separation document (WD AGO Form 53-55) be corrected to add the Purple Heart he was awarded for being wounded in action in Germany in September 1944, and by providing him the correct disability compensation due from the date of his discharge in 1945. Although this treatment record does not indicate the injury was battle related, a WD AGO Form 106, dated 29 November 1945 and War Department Letter Order, dated 4 January 1946, published by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004505
The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: * WD AGO Form 53-55 * newspaper article * service record review and verification for awards * Honorable Discharge Certificate * PH medal photographs CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. As a result, it would be appropriate to award him the BSM and add this medal to his WD AGO Form 53-55. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008440
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The FSM's military records are not available to the Board for review. Item 33 (Decorations and Awards) of the FSM's separation document shows he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: European-African-Middle Eastern (EAME) Campaign Medal with 1 bronze service star; Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM); and American Theater Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016379C071029
It states, in pertinent part, that in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that the wound was treated by military medical personnel, and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence a member was wounded/injured in action, was treated for the wound/injury by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060477C070421
The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. Also on file is a military record finding report from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), dated 1 August 2001. The Board also finds the available evidence confirms that the applicant served with the 507 th Parachute Infantry Regiment in the ETO and that the unit listed in his separation document was likely a transitional unit to which he was assigned for movement and processing prior to his...