| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Joyce A. Wright | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Chairperson | |
| Mr. William D. Powers | Member | |
| Ms. Linda M. Barker | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 26 February 2001, be removed from his Performance Fiche, Service Computation Data Section of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).
3. The applicant states his DD Form 214, dated 26 February 2001, was prepared in error. He reenlisted on 30 January 2001, approximately one month prior to the preparation of his DD Form 214, with no break in service. In support of his application, he submits copies of his: DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment/ Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States), dated 30 January 1997; Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 29 January 2001; Oath of Reenlistment, dated 30 January 2001; and a copy of his revocation orders, dated 20 February 2001.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted on 30 January 1997, as a light weapons infantryman (11B), for a period of 4 years. He continues to serve on active duty in the rank of SSG.
5. The applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 4 which shows that he enlisted on 30 January 1997 in the pay grade of E-1.
6. The applicant provided a copy of his Honorable Discharge Certificate that shows that he was honorably discharged on 29 January 2001, as a sergeant (SGT/E-5).
7. The applicant provided a copy of his Oath of Reenlistment that shows that his Oath was administered on 30 January 2001.
8. The applicant's records contain a copy of his DD Form 4 that shows he reenlisted on 30 January 2001 in the pay grade of E-5.
9. The applicant's records contain a copy of Headquarters, Fort Myer Military Community Orders Number 273-0004, dated 29 September 2000. This order shows that the applicant had a reporting date of 26 February 2001 to the transition point.
10. The applicant provided a copy of Headquarters, Fort Myer Military Community Orders Number 051-0001, dated 20 February 2001 that revoked his orders dated 29 September 2000.
11. He was promoted to SSG/E-6 effective 1 November 2002.
12. The applicant’s Performance Fiche, Service Computation Data Section, shows his DD Form 214, dated 26 February 2001.
13. Army Regulation 635-5 governs the preparation of the DD Form 214. It states, in pertinent part, that a DD Form 214 will be prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge or release from Active Army. It also states that effective 1 October 1979, DD Forms 214 would no longer be issued for immediate reenlistments and that all service would be continuous from the date the last DD Form 214 was issued.
14. Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/
Records) prescribes the policies governing the Official Military Personnel File, the Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ), the Career Management Individual File, and Army Personnel Qualification Records. Paragraph 2-4 of this regulation states that once a document is placed in the Official Military Personnel File it becomes a permanent part of that file and will not be removed from that file or moved to another part of the file unless directed by the proper authorities listed in the regulation. Table 2 of the regulation pertains to the composition of the OMPF. It states, in pertinent part, that DD Forms 214 will be filed on the Performance Fiche, Service Computation Data Section.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record shows that he enlisted on 30 January 1997 and reenlisted on 30 January 2001, with no break in service. The evidence also shows that orders were published prior to his reenlistment date and were revoked after his reenlistment date.
2. The applicant's DD Form 214, dated 26 February 2001 was prepared in error and placed on the applicant's Performance Fiche, Service Computation Data Section. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the applicant's DD Form 214, dated 26 February 2001 should be expunged from the applicant's OMPF.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the individual concerned be corrected by expunging the DD Form 214, dated 26 February 2001 from the Service Computation Data Section of the Performance Fiche and any other military records.
BOARD VOTE:
_RJW__ _WDP___ _LMB___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Raymond J. Wagner
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2003085492 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030304 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | Active duty |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | Active duty |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 243 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063105C070421
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the documents pertaining to her noncommissioned officer evaluation report (NCOER) appeal, for the NCOER dated December 1996 – November 1997, be removed from the restricted fiche of her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). As supporting evidence she provides: the Enlisted Special Review Board’s (ESRB’s) decision that the evidence did not justify altering or withdrawing the NCOER for the period December 1996 – November 1997; the U. S. Army Enlisted Records and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073126C070403
The Board considered the following evidence: He provides three letters of support dated 4 March, 18 April, and 23 April 2002; the court document showing his case was dismissed without prejudice; the Department of the Army Suitability Evaluation Board (DASEB) packet; and his HQDA QMP bar to reenlistment appeal packet as supporting evidence. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by transferring the GOMOR issued to the applicant on 15 January 1997,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018297
The applicant requests removal of two DA Forms 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) dated 19 July 1999 and 26 February 2001 from her official military personnel file (OMPF). The document will not be removed from a fiche or moved to another part of the fiche unless directed by, among other agencies, the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) or the OMPF custodian when documents have been improperly filed. The applicable regulation states that once a document...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016983
The applicant continues that a memorandum for the disqualification of the first award for the Army Good Conduct Medal was erroneously filed in his MPRJ (Military Personnel Jacket Record) and in the performance section of his OMPF. The applicant contends that the memorandum of disqualification, dated 9 February 2001, for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, filed in the performance portion of his OMPF should be removed. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010683
The applicant requests the DD Form214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) with a separation date of 20070910 be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The subject DD Form 214 was completed in preparation for the applicant's separation from the RA. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by voiding his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 20070910 and removing it from his OMPF...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071763C070403
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his two Memorandums of Reprimand (MOR) be removed from his Performance (P) fiche, Disciplinary Data Section, and transferred to his Restricted (R) of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). APPLICANT STATES : That his two MORs have served their purpose, remained in his record for more than 4 years, and since receiving his MORs his military performance has been nothing but stellar. Paragraph 2-4 of this regulation states that once a document is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058438C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: The applicant requests that his NCO evaluation report (NCOER) for the period December 1991 through November 1992 be removed from his official military personnel file (OMPF), transferred to the restricted portion of his OMPF, or that the senior rater comments be deleted from that NCOER. APPLICANT STATES : That the Board should consider the whole soldier...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087979C070212
He successfully completed his tour as a drill sergeant at Fort Benning, Georgia and he has continued superior duty performance as evidence by the eight Non-Commissioned Officer Evaluation Reports (NCOERs) he submitted with his application. On the same date, the applicant's unit commander recommended that the LOR be filed in the applicant's OMPF. The applicant successfully completed his tour as a drill sergeant without further incident; the QMP bar to reenlistment has been removed; and the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087846C070212
The applicant requests the transfer of a DA Form 1059 dated 25 June 1999, promotion orders dated 27 September 2001 and Board proceedings dated 3 January 2003 be transferred to the Restricted fiche of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant states, in effect, that he has previously won his appeal before the Board and requests that his records be corrected by transferring the requested documents to the Restricted fiche of his OMPF in order that his chances for selection to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009895
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) of this Army regulation states that the DD Forms 553 and 616 are filed on the performance section of the OMPF and that the DA Form 4187 that shows time lost to be made good to...