| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Joyce A. Wright | Analyst |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Frank C. Jones | Member | |
| Mr. William D. Powers | Member |
2. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for his right leg fragment wound. This is, in effect, a request for all awards he may be entitled to.
3. The applicant states that he received a fragment wound to his right leg and was treated at Chu Lai Field Hospital in April or May 1969. At that time, he declined the award because it was offered to him while he was in the same tent where others were dying. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) dated 1 February 1973.
4. The applicant’s military records show he was inducted on 6 December 1967, as a field artillery operations and intelligence assistant, in military occupational specialty (MOS) 13E. He served in Vietnam from 8 September 1968 to 27 August 1969. He continued to serve until he was released from active duty on 31 August 1969. He was transferred to the Army Reserve.
5. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, an Overseas Service Bar, the Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar (M-60), and the Sharpshooter Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14). His discharge document does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.
6. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show an entry in item 40 (Wounds) and does not show the Purple Heart as an entry in item 41 (Awards and Decorations). There are no entries on the DA Form 20 to show that he was treated at Chu Lai Field Hospital in April or May 1969 for a fragment wound to his right leg.
7. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. There also is no evidence in his records that shows he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action while serving in Vietnam.
8. The applicant's medical records are unavailable for review. However, his records contain a copy of his separation medical examination, dated 31 August 1969, which shows that he was issued a physical profile of 111111 and was qualified for separation. It also failed to indicate a fragment wound to the applicant's right leg.
9. The applicant’s name failed to appear on the Vietnam Casualty List for a fragment wound received to his right leg in April or May 1969 or for any other wound during his service in Vietnam as a result of enemy action.
10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
11. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that the applicant is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974.
12. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. After 27 June 1950 to the present time, the current standard for award of the Good Conduct Medal is 3 years of qualifying service, but as little as one year is required for the first award in those cases when the period of service ends with the termination of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.
13. Review of the applicant’s service personnel records does not reveal that he was recommended for or entitled to any other awards or decorations.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contentions are noted; however, he has failed to provide medical evidence to show that he received a fragment wound to his right leg as a result of hostile action while serving in Vietnam. The applicant has also failed to provide evidence to show that he declined the award of the Purple Heart when offered. It was also noted that his separation medical examination, dated 31 August 1969 indicated that he was qualified for separation and failed to indicate that he received a fragment wound to his right leg.
2. The is no evidence of record, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows he was injured or wounded due to hostile action. There also are no orders officially awarding the award of the Purple Heart. Therefore, based on the available evidence, there is no basis to approve or to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant's unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award.
4. The applicant is entitled to the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 6 December 1967 to 31 August 1969 based on completion of a period of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award.
5. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records, but only as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 6 December 1967 to 31 August 1969.
2. That so much of the application as pertains to the award of the Purple Heart be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__mm___ __fj___ __wp____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___Melvin H. Meyer___
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2003084195 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20031021 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | HD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19690831 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 61 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009319
The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Separation or Discharge) be corrected by adding the Purple Heart and Combat Infantryman Badge as a unit award. U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation Number 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) specifically governed award of the Combat Infantryman Badge to Army forces operating in South Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012877
The applicant's military records do not contain any general orders awarding him the 2nd award of the Purple Heart. While there are no orders in the applicants available records awarding him a 2nd award of the Purple Heart, his DA Form 20 verifies that he sustained multiple fragment wounds on 25 May 1970 and was a patient at the 27th Surgical Hospital. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105271C070208
There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel records to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. DA Pamphlet 672-3, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, dated 29 January 1988, which lists unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam, shows that the unit the applicant was assigned to, Troop C 1st Squadron, 1st Cavalry, was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross, with Palm, Unit Citation, for the period 24 August through 31 December 1969 and for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002530
During its original review of the case, the Board determined the applicant's available record did not show and he did not provide conclusive evidence to show that his wounds were the result of hostile action, that he was treated for such wounds by medical personnel, and that his treatment was made a matter official record. He was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008381
The applicant states he received the medals but they are not shown on his DD Form 214. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Purple Heart (2nd Award) for wounds received in action on 2 January 1970 in Vietnam * adding to his DD Form 214 the: * Purple Heart (2nd Award) * Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award) * Marksman...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012962
There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart; there is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds; and the applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076325C070215
The applicant states that he did not receive a Purple Heart for being wounded in the Republic of Vietnam and was "R.T.O. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001215C070206
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant participated in three campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which entitles him to award of the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 15 September 1969 through 19 April 1971;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001215C070206
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant participated in three campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which entitles him to award of the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 15 September 1969 through 19 April 1971;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011035
Evidence of record shows that the applicant served 2 years of active federal serve with no disciplinary infractions listed. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his records to show these awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 15 September 1968; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 11 March 1968 to 10 March...