Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011035
Original file (20090011035.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  24 November 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090011035 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states that he was wounded when a 122mm rocket hit his bunker in Hy Tan, Vietnam.  He maintains that he was treated and hospitalized at Chu Lai for 10 to 15 days.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his 10 March 1970 DD Form 214 and his Veterans Affairs (VA) disability rating.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  Records show the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 11 March 1968.  The applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam from 
16 August 1968 to 15 August 1969 and was assigned to Company B, 3rd Battalion, 1st Infantry, 11th Infantry Brigade.  He was honorably released from active duty on 10 March 1970.

3.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the following:  National Defense Service Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, Army Commendation Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal with 60 Device, Bronze Star Medal with V Device, Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge (M -16) (M-14), and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge (M-60).  The applicant's military service records do not contain any general orders awarding him the Purple Heart.

4.  The applicant's VA rating shows that he was awarded a 10 percent disability rating for a residual shell fragment wound in the back.

5.  Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the entry "Fragment Wound - Back."  The entry is dated 
15 September 1968. 

6.  Additionally, the applicant's name is listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.  The roster verified that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action on 15 September 1968.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  Paragraph 2-8b(2) states that for the purpose of considering an award of the Purple Heart, a “wound” is defined as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force, element, or agent sustained while in action in the face of the armed enemy or as a result of a hostile act of such enemy.  

8.  Review of the applicant's DD Form 214 indicates that he is entitled to additional awards that are not shown on this form.  The applicant's DD Form 214 does not list award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation or the Valorous Unit Award.

9.  Item 38 (Conduct and Efficiency) of  the applicant's DA Form 20 shows that he was rated as "excellent" on all the entries listed on this form.  Additionally, there are no records of disciplinary infractions contained in the applicant's file.  
10.  Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.  Ratings of "Unknown" for portions of the period under consideration are not disqualifying.  

11.  The Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This document shows the 3d Battalion, 1st Infantry, during the period that the applicant was assigned, was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation by Department of the Army General Orders Number 2, dated 1971; and the Valorous Unit Award by Department of the Army General Orders Number 43, dated 1972.

12.  Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 shows that the applicant participated in four campaigns during his tour of duty in Vietnam.  This same regulation states that a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows award of the Vietnam Service Medal.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The Vietnam Casualty Roster shows the applicant was wounded by a hostile force on 15 September 1968.  Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart.

2.  Evidence of record shows that the applicant served 2 years of active federal serve with no disciplinary infractions listed.  His conduct and efficiency ratings were all listed as “excellent.”  Therefore, he is entitled to award of the AGCM.

3.  Evidence of record further shows that the applicant is entitled to wear the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Valorous Unit Award.  Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his records to show these awards.

4.  The evidence also shows that the applicant participated in four campaigns during his service in Vietnam.  Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his records to show award of four bronze service stars to be worn on his Vietnam Service Medal.

BOARD VOTE:

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 15 September 1968;

	b.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 11 March 1968 to 10 March 1970;

   c.  adding to the individual’s 10 March 1970 DD Form 214 the Purple Heart, Army Good Conduct Medal, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Valorous Unit Award, and four bronze service stars to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.
   
   
   
   
      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011035





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011035



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004248C070205

    Original file (20060004248C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Headquarters, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile) General Orders Number 13918, dated 12 November 1968, show the applicant received the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service during the period October 1967 to October 1968. Therefore, the service medical records and the entry on the Vietnam Casualty Roster which show the applicant was wounded on 14 May 1970 as a result of hostile action are accepted as sufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart and correction of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009518

    Original file (20090009518.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, the preponderance of evidence shows the applicant is entitled to the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service from 26 October 1965 to 28 September 1968 ending with termination of a period of Federal military service. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018946

    Original file (20110018946.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 27 August 1968 through 26 August 1970 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Purple Heart and the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars; b. awarding him the Purple Heart (2nd award) for wounds...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | AR20060014987C071029

    Original file (AR20060014987C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the Purple Heart be included on his Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214). However, there is no evidence in the available records that preclude the applicant from being awarded the Good Conduct Medal for his service in the Army from 17 May 1968 through 10 March 1970 while serving in the rank and pay grade of specialist four (E-4). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017908

    Original file (20090017908.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the wear of multiple awards of this unit citation badge is not authorized, official military personnel and historical records will indicate all awards received. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000152

    Original file (20090000152.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This document shows the applicant's unit is eligible for award of the Valorous Unit Award for actions during the period 31 January 1968 to 25 February 1968 based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 43, dated 1970. The entry on the Vietnam Casualty Roster and the applicant's DA Form 20 which show he was wounded on 23 June 1968 in Vietnam are accepted as sufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017274

    Original file (20090017274.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows he wounded as a result of hostile action on 16 July 1968 in Vietnam and was awarded the Purple Heart. Despite the lack of general orders awarding the applicant the Purple Heart with first oak leaf cluster, the evidence shows he is qualified for award of the Purple Heart with first oak leaf cluster for wounds received as a result of hostile action on 30 January 1969 as verified by the Vietnam casualty roster. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003981C070206

    Original file (20050003981C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 25 August 1968 in Vietnam; and b. amending his DD Form 214 for the period ending 16 May 1969 to add the Purple Heart and to show that he was awarded the Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010319

    Original file (20090010319.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is sufficient evidence which confirms the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action and as such is entitled to an award of the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 18 June 1967 while in Vietnam. Records show the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received on 18 June 1967 while in Vietnam; b. deleting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000664

    Original file (20070000664.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not show the award of the Purple Heart for his wound received in action on 3 May 1970. The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 3 May 1970 and correction of his records to show this award.